Metodi per aumentare la partecipazione ai programmi di screening oncologici.

Translated title of the contribution: [Methods to increase participation in cancer screening programmes].

Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Laura Camilloni, Carla Cogo, Antonio Federici, Eliana Ferroni, Giacomo Furnari, Livia Giordano, Grazia Grazzini, Anna Iossa, Beatriz Jimenez, Mauro Palazzi, Fabio Palazzo, Teresa Spadea, Carlo Senore, Piero Borgia, Gabriella Guasticchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

to synthesize scientific evidences about methods to increase cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening participation. a multidisciplinary working group has been set up to define the scope of the report and to conduct the evaluation. The scope and the final evaluation have been submitted to a stakeholder committee, including the Ministry of Health, the National Screening Observatory, regional screening program coordinators, scientific societies, and Lega Italiana Lotta ai Tumori, for comments and integrations. A systematic review of the principal biomedical and social literature databases was conducted to identify experimental and observational studies, updating the existing review by Jepson and coll. (Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(14):i-vii, 1-133). 5900 have been identified, 900 relevant for the topic.Among those, 148 reported quantitative information on intervention efficacy, other 90 came from the previous review. Organised screening programmes, based on invitation letter or on GP involvement,were consistently effective in increasing participation compared to spontaneous screening. Interventions are classified according to their target: individual, community, test simplification, health operators, health service organization. The report presents meta-analyses on efficacy, analyses of cost-effectiveness, impact on organisation and social inequality, and ethical and legal issues, of all the intervention reported in the literature. there are several interventions consistently effective in any context, some of them have minimal impact on costs and health service resources.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1-104
Number of pages104
JournalEpidemiologia e prevenzione
Volume36
Issue number1 Suppl 1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Health Services
Health
Organizations
Health Resources
Ethics
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Observational Studies
Meta-Analysis
Colorectal Neoplasms
Databases
Breast Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Rossi, P. G., Camilloni, L., Cogo, C., Federici, A., Ferroni, E., Furnari, G., ... Guasticchi, G. (2012). Metodi per aumentare la partecipazione ai programmi di screening oncologici. Epidemiologia e prevenzione, 36(1 Suppl 1), 1-104.

Metodi per aumentare la partecipazione ai programmi di screening oncologici. / Rossi, Paolo Giorgi; Camilloni, Laura; Cogo, Carla; Federici, Antonio; Ferroni, Eliana; Furnari, Giacomo; Giordano, Livia; Grazzini, Grazia; Iossa, Anna; Jimenez, Beatriz; Palazzi, Mauro; Palazzo, Fabio; Spadea, Teresa; Senore, Carlo; Borgia, Piero; Guasticchi, Gabriella.

In: Epidemiologia e prevenzione, Vol. 36, No. 1 Suppl 1, 01.2012, p. 1-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rossi, PG, Camilloni, L, Cogo, C, Federici, A, Ferroni, E, Furnari, G, Giordano, L, Grazzini, G, Iossa, A, Jimenez, B, Palazzi, M, Palazzo, F, Spadea, T, Senore, C, Borgia, P & Guasticchi, G 2012, 'Metodi per aumentare la partecipazione ai programmi di screening oncologici.', Epidemiologia e prevenzione, vol. 36, no. 1 Suppl 1, pp. 1-104.
Rossi PG, Camilloni L, Cogo C, Federici A, Ferroni E, Furnari G et al. Metodi per aumentare la partecipazione ai programmi di screening oncologici. Epidemiologia e prevenzione. 2012 Jan;36(1 Suppl 1):1-104.
Rossi, Paolo Giorgi ; Camilloni, Laura ; Cogo, Carla ; Federici, Antonio ; Ferroni, Eliana ; Furnari, Giacomo ; Giordano, Livia ; Grazzini, Grazia ; Iossa, Anna ; Jimenez, Beatriz ; Palazzi, Mauro ; Palazzo, Fabio ; Spadea, Teresa ; Senore, Carlo ; Borgia, Piero ; Guasticchi, Gabriella. / Metodi per aumentare la partecipazione ai programmi di screening oncologici. In: Epidemiologia e prevenzione. 2012 ; Vol. 36, No. 1 Suppl 1. pp. 1-104.
@article{f6a47b695b1944d8aa124535464448c7,
title = "Metodi per aumentare la partecipazione ai programmi di screening oncologici.",
abstract = "to synthesize scientific evidences about methods to increase cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening participation. a multidisciplinary working group has been set up to define the scope of the report and to conduct the evaluation. The scope and the final evaluation have been submitted to a stakeholder committee, including the Ministry of Health, the National Screening Observatory, regional screening program coordinators, scientific societies, and Lega Italiana Lotta ai Tumori, for comments and integrations. A systematic review of the principal biomedical and social literature databases was conducted to identify experimental and observational studies, updating the existing review by Jepson and coll. (Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(14):i-vii, 1-133). 5900 have been identified, 900 relevant for the topic.Among those, 148 reported quantitative information on intervention efficacy, other 90 came from the previous review. Organised screening programmes, based on invitation letter or on GP involvement,were consistently effective in increasing participation compared to spontaneous screening. Interventions are classified according to their target: individual, community, test simplification, health operators, health service organization. The report presents meta-analyses on efficacy, analyses of cost-effectiveness, impact on organisation and social inequality, and ethical and legal issues, of all the intervention reported in the literature. there are several interventions consistently effective in any context, some of them have minimal impact on costs and health service resources.",
author = "Rossi, {Paolo Giorgi} and Laura Camilloni and Carla Cogo and Antonio Federici and Eliana Ferroni and Giacomo Furnari and Livia Giordano and Grazia Grazzini and Anna Iossa and Beatriz Jimenez and Mauro Palazzi and Fabio Palazzo and Teresa Spadea and Carlo Senore and Piero Borgia and Gabriella Guasticchi",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
language = "Italian",
volume = "36",
pages = "1--104",
journal = "Epidemiologia e prevenzione",
issn = "1120-9763",
publisher = "Zadig s.r.l",
number = "1 Suppl 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metodi per aumentare la partecipazione ai programmi di screening oncologici.

AU - Rossi, Paolo Giorgi

AU - Camilloni, Laura

AU - Cogo, Carla

AU - Federici, Antonio

AU - Ferroni, Eliana

AU - Furnari, Giacomo

AU - Giordano, Livia

AU - Grazzini, Grazia

AU - Iossa, Anna

AU - Jimenez, Beatriz

AU - Palazzi, Mauro

AU - Palazzo, Fabio

AU - Spadea, Teresa

AU - Senore, Carlo

AU - Borgia, Piero

AU - Guasticchi, Gabriella

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - to synthesize scientific evidences about methods to increase cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening participation. a multidisciplinary working group has been set up to define the scope of the report and to conduct the evaluation. The scope and the final evaluation have been submitted to a stakeholder committee, including the Ministry of Health, the National Screening Observatory, regional screening program coordinators, scientific societies, and Lega Italiana Lotta ai Tumori, for comments and integrations. A systematic review of the principal biomedical and social literature databases was conducted to identify experimental and observational studies, updating the existing review by Jepson and coll. (Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(14):i-vii, 1-133). 5900 have been identified, 900 relevant for the topic.Among those, 148 reported quantitative information on intervention efficacy, other 90 came from the previous review. Organised screening programmes, based on invitation letter or on GP involvement,were consistently effective in increasing participation compared to spontaneous screening. Interventions are classified according to their target: individual, community, test simplification, health operators, health service organization. The report presents meta-analyses on efficacy, analyses of cost-effectiveness, impact on organisation and social inequality, and ethical and legal issues, of all the intervention reported in the literature. there are several interventions consistently effective in any context, some of them have minimal impact on costs and health service resources.

AB - to synthesize scientific evidences about methods to increase cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening participation. a multidisciplinary working group has been set up to define the scope of the report and to conduct the evaluation. The scope and the final evaluation have been submitted to a stakeholder committee, including the Ministry of Health, the National Screening Observatory, regional screening program coordinators, scientific societies, and Lega Italiana Lotta ai Tumori, for comments and integrations. A systematic review of the principal biomedical and social literature databases was conducted to identify experimental and observational studies, updating the existing review by Jepson and coll. (Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(14):i-vii, 1-133). 5900 have been identified, 900 relevant for the topic.Among those, 148 reported quantitative information on intervention efficacy, other 90 came from the previous review. Organised screening programmes, based on invitation letter or on GP involvement,were consistently effective in increasing participation compared to spontaneous screening. Interventions are classified according to their target: individual, community, test simplification, health operators, health service organization. The report presents meta-analyses on efficacy, analyses of cost-effectiveness, impact on organisation and social inequality, and ethical and legal issues, of all the intervention reported in the literature. there are several interventions consistently effective in any context, some of them have minimal impact on costs and health service resources.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863797113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863797113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

C2 - 22418841

AN - SCOPUS:84863797113

VL - 36

SP - 1

EP - 104

JO - Epidemiologia e prevenzione

JF - Epidemiologia e prevenzione

SN - 1120-9763

IS - 1 Suppl 1

ER -