MGMT expression and promoter methylation status may depend on the site of surgical sample collection within glioblastoma: A possible pitfall in stratification of patients?

Alessandro Della Puppa, Luca Persano, Giulia Masi, Elena Rampazzo, Alessandro Sinigaglia, Francesca Pistollato, Luca Denaro, Luisa Barzon, Giorgio Palù, Giuseppe Basso, Renato Scienza, Domenico D'Avella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We recently described a three-layer concentric model of a glioblastoma (GBM) related to a specific distribution of molecular and phenotypic characteristics driven by the intratumoral hypoxic gradient in which the cancer stem cells niche is located in the hypoxic necrotic core of the tumour. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status and MGMT expression in GBM samples collected according to the three-layer concentric model. Multiple tissue samples were obtained, by means of image-guided surgery, from the three concentric layers of newly diagnosed GBM. Two samples from each layer were collected from 12 patients (total 72 samples). Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was determined by methylation-specific polymerase-chain-reaction analysis. In all tumours, MGMT protein expression decreased progressively from the inner to the outer layer, and methylation of the MGMT promoter was unrelated to tumour layer. In particular, the MGMT promoter was unmethylated in all layers in 41.7% of tumours, methylated in all layers in 25%, and variably methylated in the three layers in 33.3%. We recorded concordance between MGMT expression and MGMT promoter methylation status within the GBM in only 58.8% of the samples collected. Our data suggest that both MGMT expression and promoter methylation data may be variable throughout GBM and that they may, consequently, depend on the site of surgical sample collection, even in the same patient. However, whereas MGMT expression is pre-operatively predictable when sampling is performed according to the three-layer concentric model, MGMT promoter methylation is not. These results must be considered when sample collection is performed for assessment of MGMT data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-41
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neuro-Oncology
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Methyltransferases
Glioblastoma
Methylation
DNA
Neoplasms
O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase
Protein Methyltransferases
Computer-Assisted Surgery
Stem Cell Niche
Neoplastic Stem Cells
DNA Methylation
Paraffin
Formaldehyde
Polymerase Chain Reaction

Keywords

  • Glioblastoma multiforme
  • Hypoxic gradient
  • MGMT expression
  • MGMT promoter methylation status
  • Sample collection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology
  • Neurology

Cite this

MGMT expression and promoter methylation status may depend on the site of surgical sample collection within glioblastoma : A possible pitfall in stratification of patients? / Della Puppa, Alessandro; Persano, Luca; Masi, Giulia; Rampazzo, Elena; Sinigaglia, Alessandro; Pistollato, Francesca; Denaro, Luca; Barzon, Luisa; Palù, Giorgio; Basso, Giuseppe; Scienza, Renato; D'Avella, Domenico.

In: Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Vol. 106, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 33-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Della Puppa, A, Persano, L, Masi, G, Rampazzo, E, Sinigaglia, A, Pistollato, F, Denaro, L, Barzon, L, Palù, G, Basso, G, Scienza, R & D'Avella, D 2012, 'MGMT expression and promoter methylation status may depend on the site of surgical sample collection within glioblastoma: A possible pitfall in stratification of patients?', Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0639-9
Della Puppa, Alessandro ; Persano, Luca ; Masi, Giulia ; Rampazzo, Elena ; Sinigaglia, Alessandro ; Pistollato, Francesca ; Denaro, Luca ; Barzon, Luisa ; Palù, Giorgio ; Basso, Giuseppe ; Scienza, Renato ; D'Avella, Domenico. / MGMT expression and promoter methylation status may depend on the site of surgical sample collection within glioblastoma : A possible pitfall in stratification of patients?. In: Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 2012 ; Vol. 106, No. 1. pp. 33-41.
@article{ade278b041a444a4a7732e6ee0a3c00e,
title = "MGMT expression and promoter methylation status may depend on the site of surgical sample collection within glioblastoma: A possible pitfall in stratification of patients?",
abstract = "We recently described a three-layer concentric model of a glioblastoma (GBM) related to a specific distribution of molecular and phenotypic characteristics driven by the intratumoral hypoxic gradient in which the cancer stem cells niche is located in the hypoxic necrotic core of the tumour. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status and MGMT expression in GBM samples collected according to the three-layer concentric model. Multiple tissue samples were obtained, by means of image-guided surgery, from the three concentric layers of newly diagnosed GBM. Two samples from each layer were collected from 12 patients (total 72 samples). Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was determined by methylation-specific polymerase-chain-reaction analysis. In all tumours, MGMT protein expression decreased progressively from the inner to the outer layer, and methylation of the MGMT promoter was unrelated to tumour layer. In particular, the MGMT promoter was unmethylated in all layers in 41.7{\%} of tumours, methylated in all layers in 25{\%}, and variably methylated in the three layers in 33.3{\%}. We recorded concordance between MGMT expression and MGMT promoter methylation status within the GBM in only 58.8{\%} of the samples collected. Our data suggest that both MGMT expression and promoter methylation data may be variable throughout GBM and that they may, consequently, depend on the site of surgical sample collection, even in the same patient. However, whereas MGMT expression is pre-operatively predictable when sampling is performed according to the three-layer concentric model, MGMT promoter methylation is not. These results must be considered when sample collection is performed for assessment of MGMT data.",
keywords = "Glioblastoma multiforme, Hypoxic gradient, MGMT expression, MGMT promoter methylation status, Sample collection",
author = "{Della Puppa}, Alessandro and Luca Persano and Giulia Masi and Elena Rampazzo and Alessandro Sinigaglia and Francesca Pistollato and Luca Denaro and Luisa Barzon and Giorgio Pal{\`u} and Giuseppe Basso and Renato Scienza and Domenico D'Avella",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11060-011-0639-9",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "33--41",
journal = "Journal of Neuro-Oncology",
issn = "0167-594X",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MGMT expression and promoter methylation status may depend on the site of surgical sample collection within glioblastoma

T2 - A possible pitfall in stratification of patients?

AU - Della Puppa, Alessandro

AU - Persano, Luca

AU - Masi, Giulia

AU - Rampazzo, Elena

AU - Sinigaglia, Alessandro

AU - Pistollato, Francesca

AU - Denaro, Luca

AU - Barzon, Luisa

AU - Palù, Giorgio

AU - Basso, Giuseppe

AU - Scienza, Renato

AU - D'Avella, Domenico

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - We recently described a three-layer concentric model of a glioblastoma (GBM) related to a specific distribution of molecular and phenotypic characteristics driven by the intratumoral hypoxic gradient in which the cancer stem cells niche is located in the hypoxic necrotic core of the tumour. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status and MGMT expression in GBM samples collected according to the three-layer concentric model. Multiple tissue samples were obtained, by means of image-guided surgery, from the three concentric layers of newly diagnosed GBM. Two samples from each layer were collected from 12 patients (total 72 samples). Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was determined by methylation-specific polymerase-chain-reaction analysis. In all tumours, MGMT protein expression decreased progressively from the inner to the outer layer, and methylation of the MGMT promoter was unrelated to tumour layer. In particular, the MGMT promoter was unmethylated in all layers in 41.7% of tumours, methylated in all layers in 25%, and variably methylated in the three layers in 33.3%. We recorded concordance between MGMT expression and MGMT promoter methylation status within the GBM in only 58.8% of the samples collected. Our data suggest that both MGMT expression and promoter methylation data may be variable throughout GBM and that they may, consequently, depend on the site of surgical sample collection, even in the same patient. However, whereas MGMT expression is pre-operatively predictable when sampling is performed according to the three-layer concentric model, MGMT promoter methylation is not. These results must be considered when sample collection is performed for assessment of MGMT data.

AB - We recently described a three-layer concentric model of a glioblastoma (GBM) related to a specific distribution of molecular and phenotypic characteristics driven by the intratumoral hypoxic gradient in which the cancer stem cells niche is located in the hypoxic necrotic core of the tumour. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status and MGMT expression in GBM samples collected according to the three-layer concentric model. Multiple tissue samples were obtained, by means of image-guided surgery, from the three concentric layers of newly diagnosed GBM. Two samples from each layer were collected from 12 patients (total 72 samples). Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was determined by methylation-specific polymerase-chain-reaction analysis. In all tumours, MGMT protein expression decreased progressively from the inner to the outer layer, and methylation of the MGMT promoter was unrelated to tumour layer. In particular, the MGMT promoter was unmethylated in all layers in 41.7% of tumours, methylated in all layers in 25%, and variably methylated in the three layers in 33.3%. We recorded concordance between MGMT expression and MGMT promoter methylation status within the GBM in only 58.8% of the samples collected. Our data suggest that both MGMT expression and promoter methylation data may be variable throughout GBM and that they may, consequently, depend on the site of surgical sample collection, even in the same patient. However, whereas MGMT expression is pre-operatively predictable when sampling is performed according to the three-layer concentric model, MGMT promoter methylation is not. These results must be considered when sample collection is performed for assessment of MGMT data.

KW - Glioblastoma multiforme

KW - Hypoxic gradient

KW - MGMT expression

KW - MGMT promoter methylation status

KW - Sample collection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83055173063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83055173063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11060-011-0639-9

DO - 10.1007/s11060-011-0639-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 21725802

AN - SCOPUS:83055173063

VL - 106

SP - 33

EP - 41

JO - Journal of Neuro-Oncology

JF - Journal of Neuro-Oncology

SN - 0167-594X

IS - 1

ER -