Emicrania e disturbi cognitivi: Una revisione della letteratura

Translated title of the contribution: Migraine and cognitive disorders: A review of the literature

Elena Sinforiani, Chiara Zucchella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Literature data on migraine (with and without aura) and cognitive disorders are not unequivocal, and this makes it impossible to draw definite conclusions. Certainly, comparison of different studies is complicated by the wide variability particularly of methodological factors (sample size, selection criteria, disease duration and severity, neuropsychological instruments used, experimental design). In the absence of a diffuse impairment, we cannot exclude the possibility of the presence of deficits in specific cognitive domains and possibly in patient subgroups. Further studies are therefore needed based on clear foundations (better knowledge of the pathophysiological basis of migraine, longitudinal experimental designs, characterization of patient subgroups, evaluation of specific cognitive domains); one particularly important aspect appears to be the neuropsychological evaluation of visuo-perceptual processes.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)44-52
Number of pages9
JournalConfinia Cephalalgica
Volume15
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Migraine Disorders
Research Design
Migraine without Aura
Migraine with Aura
Sample Size
Patient Selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Emicrania e disturbi cognitivi : Una revisione della letteratura. / Sinforiani, Elena; Zucchella, Chiara.

In: Confinia Cephalalgica, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2006, p. 44-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{30a5da2f026044e8ae38cef81ab48edb,
title = "Emicrania e disturbi cognitivi: Una revisione della letteratura",
abstract = "Literature data on migraine (with and without aura) and cognitive disorders are not unequivocal, and this makes it impossible to draw definite conclusions. Certainly, comparison of different studies is complicated by the wide variability particularly of methodological factors (sample size, selection criteria, disease duration and severity, neuropsychological instruments used, experimental design). In the absence of a diffuse impairment, we cannot exclude the possibility of the presence of deficits in specific cognitive domains and possibly in patient subgroups. Further studies are therefore needed based on clear foundations (better knowledge of the pathophysiological basis of migraine, longitudinal experimental designs, characterization of patient subgroups, evaluation of specific cognitive domains); one particularly important aspect appears to be the neuropsychological evaluation of visuo-perceptual processes.",
keywords = "Cognitive disorders, Migraine with aura, Migraine without aura, Neuropsychological tests",
author = "Elena Sinforiani and Chiara Zucchella",
year = "2006",
language = "Italian",
volume = "15",
pages = "44--52",
journal = "Confinia Cephalalgica",
issn = "1122-0279",
publisher = "Fondazione CIRNA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emicrania e disturbi cognitivi

T2 - Una revisione della letteratura

AU - Sinforiani, Elena

AU - Zucchella, Chiara

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Literature data on migraine (with and without aura) and cognitive disorders are not unequivocal, and this makes it impossible to draw definite conclusions. Certainly, comparison of different studies is complicated by the wide variability particularly of methodological factors (sample size, selection criteria, disease duration and severity, neuropsychological instruments used, experimental design). In the absence of a diffuse impairment, we cannot exclude the possibility of the presence of deficits in specific cognitive domains and possibly in patient subgroups. Further studies are therefore needed based on clear foundations (better knowledge of the pathophysiological basis of migraine, longitudinal experimental designs, characterization of patient subgroups, evaluation of specific cognitive domains); one particularly important aspect appears to be the neuropsychological evaluation of visuo-perceptual processes.

AB - Literature data on migraine (with and without aura) and cognitive disorders are not unequivocal, and this makes it impossible to draw definite conclusions. Certainly, comparison of different studies is complicated by the wide variability particularly of methodological factors (sample size, selection criteria, disease duration and severity, neuropsychological instruments used, experimental design). In the absence of a diffuse impairment, we cannot exclude the possibility of the presence of deficits in specific cognitive domains and possibly in patient subgroups. Further studies are therefore needed based on clear foundations (better knowledge of the pathophysiological basis of migraine, longitudinal experimental designs, characterization of patient subgroups, evaluation of specific cognitive domains); one particularly important aspect appears to be the neuropsychological evaluation of visuo-perceptual processes.

KW - Cognitive disorders

KW - Migraine with aura

KW - Migraine without aura

KW - Neuropsychological tests

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248652940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248652940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

AN - SCOPUS:34248652940

VL - 15

SP - 44

EP - 52

JO - Confinia Cephalalgica

JF - Confinia Cephalalgica

SN - 1122-0279

IS - 2

ER -