Minilaparotomia versus laparoscopia nel trattamento della litiasi biliare: nostra esperienza.

Translated title of the contribution: Minilaparotomy versus laparoscopy in the treatment of cholelithiasis: our experience

G. Candela, S. Varriale, F. Manetta, L. Di Libero, F. Civitello, G. Argenziano, A. Pizza, L. Santini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The traditional biliary surgery has undergone some transformations to patient's advantage. Nowadays the open-surgery of cholelithiasis is inclined to reduce the incision to 5-6 cm and to perform a transverse one to respect the anatomy of abdominal wall. From July 2002 to April 2006, 82 cholecystectomy (53 minilaparotomy cholecystectomy, and 29 laparoscopic cholecystectomy) have been performed in our institution.The two groups are homogeneous for age, sex, BMI, ASA. Among the patients who underwent a minilaparotomy cholecystectomy we observed a quick recovery of normal activities already 24 hours from the operation, a hospital stay of 24-48 hours and an excellent esthetic result. The minilaparotomy approach is, in our opinion, similar to laparoscopic for short and long time results. Nevertheless, according to medical literature, our first choice is for laparoscopic approach and we prefer laparotomy approach in selected clinical conditions.

Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)35-38
Number of pages4
JournalGiornale di Chirurgia
Volume28
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Cholelithiasis
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy
Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Abdominal Wall
Therapeutics
Esthetics
Length of Stay
Anatomy
Age Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Candela, G., Varriale, S., Manetta, F., Di Libero, L., Civitello, F., Argenziano, G., ... Santini, L. (2007). Minilaparotomia versus laparoscopia nel trattamento della litiasi biliare: nostra esperienza. Giornale di Chirurgia, 28(1-2), 35-38.

Minilaparotomia versus laparoscopia nel trattamento della litiasi biliare : nostra esperienza. / Candela, G.; Varriale, S.; Manetta, F.; Di Libero, L.; Civitello, F.; Argenziano, G.; Pizza, A.; Santini, L.

In: Giornale di Chirurgia, Vol. 28, No. 1-2, 01.2007, p. 35-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Candela, G, Varriale, S, Manetta, F, Di Libero, L, Civitello, F, Argenziano, G, Pizza, A & Santini, L 2007, 'Minilaparotomia versus laparoscopia nel trattamento della litiasi biliare: nostra esperienza.', Giornale di Chirurgia, vol. 28, no. 1-2, pp. 35-38.
Candela G, Varriale S, Manetta F, Di Libero L, Civitello F, Argenziano G et al. Minilaparotomia versus laparoscopia nel trattamento della litiasi biliare: nostra esperienza. Giornale di Chirurgia. 2007 Jan;28(1-2):35-38.
Candela, G. ; Varriale, S. ; Manetta, F. ; Di Libero, L. ; Civitello, F. ; Argenziano, G. ; Pizza, A. ; Santini, L. / Minilaparotomia versus laparoscopia nel trattamento della litiasi biliare : nostra esperienza. In: Giornale di Chirurgia. 2007 ; Vol. 28, No. 1-2. pp. 35-38.
@article{cf9483256dc044d68cf42c9c4788cd6e,
title = "Minilaparotomia versus laparoscopia nel trattamento della litiasi biliare: nostra esperienza.",
abstract = "The traditional biliary surgery has undergone some transformations to patient's advantage. Nowadays the open-surgery of cholelithiasis is inclined to reduce the incision to 5-6 cm and to perform a transverse one to respect the anatomy of abdominal wall. From July 2002 to April 2006, 82 cholecystectomy (53 minilaparotomy cholecystectomy, and 29 laparoscopic cholecystectomy) have been performed in our institution.The two groups are homogeneous for age, sex, BMI, ASA. Among the patients who underwent a minilaparotomy cholecystectomy we observed a quick recovery of normal activities already 24 hours from the operation, a hospital stay of 24-48 hours and an excellent esthetic result. The minilaparotomy approach is, in our opinion, similar to laparoscopic for short and long time results. Nevertheless, according to medical literature, our first choice is for laparoscopic approach and we prefer laparotomy approach in selected clinical conditions.",
author = "G. Candela and S. Varriale and F. Manetta and {Di Libero}, L. and F. Civitello and G. Argenziano and A. Pizza and L. Santini",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
language = "Italian",
volume = "28",
pages = "35--38",
journal = "Giornale di Chirurgia",
issn = "0391-9005",
publisher = "CIC Edizioni Internazionali s.r.l.",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minilaparotomia versus laparoscopia nel trattamento della litiasi biliare

T2 - nostra esperienza.

AU - Candela, G.

AU - Varriale, S.

AU - Manetta, F.

AU - Di Libero, L.

AU - Civitello, F.

AU - Argenziano, G.

AU - Pizza, A.

AU - Santini, L.

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - The traditional biliary surgery has undergone some transformations to patient's advantage. Nowadays the open-surgery of cholelithiasis is inclined to reduce the incision to 5-6 cm and to perform a transverse one to respect the anatomy of abdominal wall. From July 2002 to April 2006, 82 cholecystectomy (53 minilaparotomy cholecystectomy, and 29 laparoscopic cholecystectomy) have been performed in our institution.The two groups are homogeneous for age, sex, BMI, ASA. Among the patients who underwent a minilaparotomy cholecystectomy we observed a quick recovery of normal activities already 24 hours from the operation, a hospital stay of 24-48 hours and an excellent esthetic result. The minilaparotomy approach is, in our opinion, similar to laparoscopic for short and long time results. Nevertheless, according to medical literature, our first choice is for laparoscopic approach and we prefer laparotomy approach in selected clinical conditions.

AB - The traditional biliary surgery has undergone some transformations to patient's advantage. Nowadays the open-surgery of cholelithiasis is inclined to reduce the incision to 5-6 cm and to perform a transverse one to respect the anatomy of abdominal wall. From July 2002 to April 2006, 82 cholecystectomy (53 minilaparotomy cholecystectomy, and 29 laparoscopic cholecystectomy) have been performed in our institution.The two groups are homogeneous for age, sex, BMI, ASA. Among the patients who underwent a minilaparotomy cholecystectomy we observed a quick recovery of normal activities already 24 hours from the operation, a hospital stay of 24-48 hours and an excellent esthetic result. The minilaparotomy approach is, in our opinion, similar to laparoscopic for short and long time results. Nevertheless, according to medical literature, our first choice is for laparoscopic approach and we prefer laparotomy approach in selected clinical conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250851647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250851647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

C2 - 17313731

AN - SCOPUS:34250851647

VL - 28

SP - 35

EP - 38

JO - Giornale di Chirurgia

JF - Giornale di Chirurgia

SN - 0391-9005

IS - 1-2

ER -