Minimally invasive approach to colorectal cancer: an evidence-based analysis

Massimiliano Bissolati, Elena Orsenigo, Carlo Staudacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was initially used for the treatment of colorectal benign disease. However, the indications for MIS techniques have progressively been expanded to include cancers. Nowadays, the indications for MIS are almost the same as those for open surgery. The scientific validation of MIS for colorectal cancer has favorably evolved. The advantages awaited for the short-term outcome were confirmed, although at the cost of longer operating time and higher costs. In parallel, tangible evidence of oncologic safety was demonstrated, and long-term results of MIS have been found comparable to those of open surgery. In the current state of MIS short-term superiority and log-term equality, less surgical injury, lower immune function depression and better postoperative outcome make MIS particularly suitable for delicate and difficult patients, such as elderly or obese; on the contrary, the lower costs have led to still consider open surgery as a valid alternative for low-impact resections (such as right colectomy). The continuous development in the field of MIS has recently led to the introduction of the single-port (SILS) and natural-orifice (NOTES) techniques, which allow better esthetic results, even if the their validation has not yet reached scientific evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-46
Number of pages10
JournalUpdates in Surgery
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Colorectal Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Colectomy
Intraoperative Complications
Esthetics
Depression
Safety

Keywords

  • Colonic cancer
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Rectal cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Minimally invasive approach to colorectal cancer : an evidence-based analysis. / Bissolati, Massimiliano; Orsenigo, Elena; Staudacher, Carlo.

In: Updates in Surgery, Vol. 68, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 37-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bissolati, Massimiliano ; Orsenigo, Elena ; Staudacher, Carlo. / Minimally invasive approach to colorectal cancer : an evidence-based analysis. In: Updates in Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 68, No. 1. pp. 37-46.
@article{45d515cc29294afba86ec953bb5b5dba,
title = "Minimally invasive approach to colorectal cancer: an evidence-based analysis",
abstract = "Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was initially used for the treatment of colorectal benign disease. However, the indications for MIS techniques have progressively been expanded to include cancers. Nowadays, the indications for MIS are almost the same as those for open surgery. The scientific validation of MIS for colorectal cancer has favorably evolved. The advantages awaited for the short-term outcome were confirmed, although at the cost of longer operating time and higher costs. In parallel, tangible evidence of oncologic safety was demonstrated, and long-term results of MIS have been found comparable to those of open surgery. In the current state of MIS short-term superiority and log-term equality, less surgical injury, lower immune function depression and better postoperative outcome make MIS particularly suitable for delicate and difficult patients, such as elderly or obese; on the contrary, the lower costs have led to still consider open surgery as a valid alternative for low-impact resections (such as right colectomy). The continuous development in the field of MIS has recently led to the introduction of the single-port (SILS) and natural-orifice (NOTES) techniques, which allow better esthetic results, even if the their validation has not yet reached scientific evidence.",
keywords = "Colonic cancer, Colorectal cancer, Evidence-based medicine, Laparoscopic surgery, Minimally invasive surgery, Rectal cancer",
author = "Massimiliano Bissolati and Elena Orsenigo and Carlo Staudacher",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13304-016-0350-7",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "37--46",
journal = "Updates in Surgery",
issn = "2038-131X",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive approach to colorectal cancer

T2 - an evidence-based analysis

AU - Bissolati, Massimiliano

AU - Orsenigo, Elena

AU - Staudacher, Carlo

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was initially used for the treatment of colorectal benign disease. However, the indications for MIS techniques have progressively been expanded to include cancers. Nowadays, the indications for MIS are almost the same as those for open surgery. The scientific validation of MIS for colorectal cancer has favorably evolved. The advantages awaited for the short-term outcome were confirmed, although at the cost of longer operating time and higher costs. In parallel, tangible evidence of oncologic safety was demonstrated, and long-term results of MIS have been found comparable to those of open surgery. In the current state of MIS short-term superiority and log-term equality, less surgical injury, lower immune function depression and better postoperative outcome make MIS particularly suitable for delicate and difficult patients, such as elderly or obese; on the contrary, the lower costs have led to still consider open surgery as a valid alternative for low-impact resections (such as right colectomy). The continuous development in the field of MIS has recently led to the introduction of the single-port (SILS) and natural-orifice (NOTES) techniques, which allow better esthetic results, even if the their validation has not yet reached scientific evidence.

AB - Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was initially used for the treatment of colorectal benign disease. However, the indications for MIS techniques have progressively been expanded to include cancers. Nowadays, the indications for MIS are almost the same as those for open surgery. The scientific validation of MIS for colorectal cancer has favorably evolved. The advantages awaited for the short-term outcome were confirmed, although at the cost of longer operating time and higher costs. In parallel, tangible evidence of oncologic safety was demonstrated, and long-term results of MIS have been found comparable to those of open surgery. In the current state of MIS short-term superiority and log-term equality, less surgical injury, lower immune function depression and better postoperative outcome make MIS particularly suitable for delicate and difficult patients, such as elderly or obese; on the contrary, the lower costs have led to still consider open surgery as a valid alternative for low-impact resections (such as right colectomy). The continuous development in the field of MIS has recently led to the introduction of the single-port (SILS) and natural-orifice (NOTES) techniques, which allow better esthetic results, even if the their validation has not yet reached scientific evidence.

KW - Colonic cancer

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Laparoscopic surgery

KW - Minimally invasive surgery

KW - Rectal cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964699539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964699539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13304-016-0350-7

DO - 10.1007/s13304-016-0350-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964699539

VL - 68

SP - 37

EP - 46

JO - Updates in Surgery

JF - Updates in Surgery

SN - 2038-131X

IS - 1

ER -