Mirror therapy in the rehabilitation of lower-limb amputation: Are there any contraindications?

Roberto Casale, Carlo Damiani, Venessa Rosati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mirror box therapy and its development (immersive virtual reality) is used in pain therapy and in rehabilitation of people with amputation affected by phantom limb-related phenomena. It allows patients to view a reflection of their anatomical limb in the visual space occupied by their phantom limb. There are only limited reports of its possible side effects. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the existence of side effects or adverse reactions in a group of 33 nonselected patients with phantom limb-related phenomena. RESULTS: Nineteen reported confusion and dizziness, 6 reported a not clearly specified sensation of irritation, and 4 refused to continue the treatment. Only 4 of the 33 patients did not have any complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Possible reasons for this large number of side effects could be the lack of selection of patients and the fact that the mirror box therapy was paralleled by a conventional rehabilitation approach targeted to the use of a prosthesis. Warnings on the need to select patients, with regard to their psychologic as well as clinical profile (including time from amputation and clinical setting), and possible conflicting mechanisms between mirror box therapy and conventional therapies are presented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)837-842
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume88
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Amputation
Lower Extremity
Rehabilitation
Phantom Limb
Therapeutics
Confusion
Dizziness
Patient Selection
Prostheses and Implants
Extremities
Pain

Keywords

  • Mirror therapy
  • Phantom limb-related phenomena
  • Side effects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Mirror therapy in the rehabilitation of lower-limb amputation : Are there any contraindications? / Casale, Roberto; Damiani, Carlo; Rosati, Venessa.

In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 88, No. 10, 10.2009, p. 837-842.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bf08705f1cc44dd2a4927a3d06aa61dc,
title = "Mirror therapy in the rehabilitation of lower-limb amputation: Are there any contraindications?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Mirror box therapy and its development (immersive virtual reality) is used in pain therapy and in rehabilitation of people with amputation affected by phantom limb-related phenomena. It allows patients to view a reflection of their anatomical limb in the visual space occupied by their phantom limb. There are only limited reports of its possible side effects. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the existence of side effects or adverse reactions in a group of 33 nonselected patients with phantom limb-related phenomena. RESULTS: Nineteen reported confusion and dizziness, 6 reported a not clearly specified sensation of irritation, and 4 refused to continue the treatment. Only 4 of the 33 patients did not have any complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Possible reasons for this large number of side effects could be the lack of selection of patients and the fact that the mirror box therapy was paralleled by a conventional rehabilitation approach targeted to the use of a prosthesis. Warnings on the need to select patients, with regard to their psychologic as well as clinical profile (including time from amputation and clinical setting), and possible conflicting mechanisms between mirror box therapy and conventional therapies are presented.",
keywords = "Mirror therapy, Phantom limb-related phenomena, Side effects",
author = "Roberto Casale and Carlo Damiani and Venessa Rosati",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181b74698",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "837--842",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mirror therapy in the rehabilitation of lower-limb amputation

T2 - Are there any contraindications?

AU - Casale, Roberto

AU - Damiani, Carlo

AU - Rosati, Venessa

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Mirror box therapy and its development (immersive virtual reality) is used in pain therapy and in rehabilitation of people with amputation affected by phantom limb-related phenomena. It allows patients to view a reflection of their anatomical limb in the visual space occupied by their phantom limb. There are only limited reports of its possible side effects. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the existence of side effects or adverse reactions in a group of 33 nonselected patients with phantom limb-related phenomena. RESULTS: Nineteen reported confusion and dizziness, 6 reported a not clearly specified sensation of irritation, and 4 refused to continue the treatment. Only 4 of the 33 patients did not have any complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Possible reasons for this large number of side effects could be the lack of selection of patients and the fact that the mirror box therapy was paralleled by a conventional rehabilitation approach targeted to the use of a prosthesis. Warnings on the need to select patients, with regard to their psychologic as well as clinical profile (including time from amputation and clinical setting), and possible conflicting mechanisms between mirror box therapy and conventional therapies are presented.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Mirror box therapy and its development (immersive virtual reality) is used in pain therapy and in rehabilitation of people with amputation affected by phantom limb-related phenomena. It allows patients to view a reflection of their anatomical limb in the visual space occupied by their phantom limb. There are only limited reports of its possible side effects. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the existence of side effects or adverse reactions in a group of 33 nonselected patients with phantom limb-related phenomena. RESULTS: Nineteen reported confusion and dizziness, 6 reported a not clearly specified sensation of irritation, and 4 refused to continue the treatment. Only 4 of the 33 patients did not have any complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Possible reasons for this large number of side effects could be the lack of selection of patients and the fact that the mirror box therapy was paralleled by a conventional rehabilitation approach targeted to the use of a prosthesis. Warnings on the need to select patients, with regard to their psychologic as well as clinical profile (including time from amputation and clinical setting), and possible conflicting mechanisms between mirror box therapy and conventional therapies are presented.

KW - Mirror therapy

KW - Phantom limb-related phenomena

KW - Side effects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349738211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349738211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181b74698

DO - 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181b74698

M3 - Article

C2 - 21119317

AN - SCOPUS:70349738211

VL - 88

SP - 837

EP - 842

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 10

ER -