Modeling individual differences in text reading fluency: A different pattern of predictors for typically developing and dyslexic readers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study was aimed at predicting individual differences in text reading fluency. The basic proposal included two factors, i.e., the ability to decode letter strings (measured by discrete pseudo-word reading) and integration of the various sub-components involved in reading (measured by Rapid Automatized Naming, RAN). Subsequently, a third factor was added to the model, i.e., naming of discrete digits. In order to use homogeneous measures, all contributing variables considered the entire processing of the item, including pronunciation time. The model, which was based on commonality analysis, was applied to data from a group of 43 typically developing readers (11-to 13-year-olds) and a group of 25 chronologically matched dyslexic children. In typically developing readers, both orthographic decoding and integration of reading sub-components contributed significantly to the overall prediction of text reading fluency. The model prediction was higher (from ca. 37 to 52% of the explained variance) when we included the naming of discrete digits variable, which had a suppressive effect on pseudo-word reading. In the dyslexic readers, the variance explained by the two-factor model was high (69%) and did not change when the third factor was added. The lack of a suppression effect was likely due to the prominent individual differences in poor orthographic decoding of the dyslexic children. Analyses on data from both groups of children were replicated by using patches of colors as stimuli (both in the RAN task and in the discrete naming task) obtaining similar results. We conclude that it is possible to predict much of the variance in text-reading fluency using basic processes, such as orthographic decoding and integration of reading sub-components, even without taking into consideration higher-order linguistic factors such as lexical, semantic and contextual abilities. The approach validity of using proximal vs. distal causes to predict reading fluency is discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1374
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume5
Issue numberNOV
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Dyslexia
  • Individual differences
  • RAN
  • Reading
  • Suppression effect
  • Vocal reaction times

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling individual differences in text reading fluency: A different pattern of predictors for typically developing and dyslexic readers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this