Modeling set-up error by daily MVCT for prostate adjuvant treatment delivered in 20 fractions: Implications for the assessment of the optimal correction strategies

Sara Broggi, Cesare Cozzarini, Claudio Fiorino, Eleonora Maggiulli, Filippo Alongi, Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo, Nadia Di Muzio, Riccardo Calandrino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To optimise image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) approaches in set-up error correction for hypofractionated adjuvant treatment of prostate cancer using helical tomotherapy (HT). Methods and materials: HT unit provides megavoltage - CT (MVCT) imaging capability for daily patient set-up. The intrinsic uncertainty of the available image registration techniques was first investigated on a pelvic phantom. To optimise different set-up correction strategies, MVCT data of 37 patients treated with 58 Gy delivered in 20 fractions were analyzed. 620 MVCT images were globally available for the analysis. Daily on-line set-up correction without any action level was applied for 27/37 patients. The residual and the effective set-up error were assessed. For 10/37 patients an off-line correction strategy with an action level was applied. Results: Phantom measurements showed an intrinsic uncertainty in MVCT imaging and registration around 0.6 mm (±0.5 mm) for each of the three main axes. The minimum value of the residual systematic error was found at 7th-10th session, with values between 0.7 and 1.1 mm (1 SD); a systematic residual error

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-252
Number of pages7
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume93
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Prostate
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Uncertainty
Image-Guided Radiotherapy
Therapeutics
Prostatic Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Correction strategies
  • Image-guided radiotherapy
  • Set-up errors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{78e99b5fb3514fec9ff9876850205c4b,
title = "Modeling set-up error by daily MVCT for prostate adjuvant treatment delivered in 20 fractions: Implications for the assessment of the optimal correction strategies",
abstract = "Purpose: To optimise image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) approaches in set-up error correction for hypofractionated adjuvant treatment of prostate cancer using helical tomotherapy (HT). Methods and materials: HT unit provides megavoltage - CT (MVCT) imaging capability for daily patient set-up. The intrinsic uncertainty of the available image registration techniques was first investigated on a pelvic phantom. To optimise different set-up correction strategies, MVCT data of 37 patients treated with 58 Gy delivered in 20 fractions were analyzed. 620 MVCT images were globally available for the analysis. Daily on-line set-up correction without any action level was applied for 27/37 patients. The residual and the effective set-up error were assessed. For 10/37 patients an off-line correction strategy with an action level was applied. Results: Phantom measurements showed an intrinsic uncertainty in MVCT imaging and registration around 0.6 mm (±0.5 mm) for each of the three main axes. The minimum value of the residual systematic error was found at 7th-10th session, with values between 0.7 and 1.1 mm (1 SD); a systematic residual error",
keywords = "Correction strategies, Image-guided radiotherapy, Set-up errors",
author = "Sara Broggi and Cesare Cozzarini and Claudio Fiorino and Eleonora Maggiulli and Filippo Alongi and Cattaneo, {Giovanni Mauro} and {Di Muzio}, Nadia and Riccardo Calandrino",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.029",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "246--252",
journal = "Radiotherapy and Oncology",
issn = "0167-8140",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling set-up error by daily MVCT for prostate adjuvant treatment delivered in 20 fractions

T2 - Implications for the assessment of the optimal correction strategies

AU - Broggi, Sara

AU - Cozzarini, Cesare

AU - Fiorino, Claudio

AU - Maggiulli, Eleonora

AU - Alongi, Filippo

AU - Cattaneo, Giovanni Mauro

AU - Di Muzio, Nadia

AU - Calandrino, Riccardo

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Purpose: To optimise image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) approaches in set-up error correction for hypofractionated adjuvant treatment of prostate cancer using helical tomotherapy (HT). Methods and materials: HT unit provides megavoltage - CT (MVCT) imaging capability for daily patient set-up. The intrinsic uncertainty of the available image registration techniques was first investigated on a pelvic phantom. To optimise different set-up correction strategies, MVCT data of 37 patients treated with 58 Gy delivered in 20 fractions were analyzed. 620 MVCT images were globally available for the analysis. Daily on-line set-up correction without any action level was applied for 27/37 patients. The residual and the effective set-up error were assessed. For 10/37 patients an off-line correction strategy with an action level was applied. Results: Phantom measurements showed an intrinsic uncertainty in MVCT imaging and registration around 0.6 mm (±0.5 mm) for each of the three main axes. The minimum value of the residual systematic error was found at 7th-10th session, with values between 0.7 and 1.1 mm (1 SD); a systematic residual error

AB - Purpose: To optimise image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) approaches in set-up error correction for hypofractionated adjuvant treatment of prostate cancer using helical tomotherapy (HT). Methods and materials: HT unit provides megavoltage - CT (MVCT) imaging capability for daily patient set-up. The intrinsic uncertainty of the available image registration techniques was first investigated on a pelvic phantom. To optimise different set-up correction strategies, MVCT data of 37 patients treated with 58 Gy delivered in 20 fractions were analyzed. 620 MVCT images were globally available for the analysis. Daily on-line set-up correction without any action level was applied for 27/37 patients. The residual and the effective set-up error were assessed. For 10/37 patients an off-line correction strategy with an action level was applied. Results: Phantom measurements showed an intrinsic uncertainty in MVCT imaging and registration around 0.6 mm (±0.5 mm) for each of the three main axes. The minimum value of the residual systematic error was found at 7th-10th session, with values between 0.7 and 1.1 mm (1 SD); a systematic residual error

KW - Correction strategies

KW - Image-guided radiotherapy

KW - Set-up errors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350492288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350492288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.029

DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 19766339

AN - SCOPUS:70350492288

VL - 93

SP - 246

EP - 252

JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology

JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology

SN - 0167-8140

IS - 2

ER -