Modified stark procedure for caesarean section. First Italian experience

A. G. Ferrari, L. Frigerio, G. Candotti, M. Origoni, A. Mariani, M. Petrone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To assess the validity of a modified Stark procedure for caesarean section, based on anatomical principles and the elimination of unnecessary surgical steps. Methods: The surgical outcome of 127 cases submitted to this procedure was compared to 95 traditional caesarean sections. We analysed total operating time, fetal extraction time, surgical material consumption, maternal blood loss, postoperative febrile morbidity and recovery in both groups. Results: Mean total operating time was 19.4 min (range 11-28) in the Stark cases and 51.7 min (range 33-80) in the control group (p <0.001). Fetal extraction time was also reduced in the Stark technique: mean time was 3.2 min (range 1-7), while in the traditional procedures it was 6.5 min (range 2-18) (p <0.001). Among the Stark cases a mean of 3.5 threads was used (range 3-6), while in the control group 9.2 (range 6-19) (p <0.001). Maternal blood loss, postoperative febrile morbidity and recovery were significantly improved in the group submitted to the modified Stark procedure. Conclusions: The theoretical background of the innovative Stark procedure seems to be confirmed by our results: the Stark procedure is associated with a significant reduction of morbidity and an improved outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-102
Number of pages8
JournalItalian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Volume9
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Cesarean Section
Postoperative Hemorrhage
Morbidity
Fever
Mothers
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Caesarean section
  • Laparotomy
  • Obstetric surgery
  • Surgical morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Ferrari, A. G., Frigerio, L., Candotti, G., Origoni, M., Mariani, A., & Petrone, M. (1997). Modified stark procedure for caesarean section. First Italian experience. Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 9(3), 95-102.

Modified stark procedure for caesarean section. First Italian experience. / Ferrari, A. G.; Frigerio, L.; Candotti, G.; Origoni, M.; Mariani, A.; Petrone, M.

In: Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1997, p. 95-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferrari, AG, Frigerio, L, Candotti, G, Origoni, M, Mariani, A & Petrone, M 1997, 'Modified stark procedure for caesarean section. First Italian experience', Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 95-102.
Ferrari, A. G. ; Frigerio, L. ; Candotti, G. ; Origoni, M. ; Mariani, A. ; Petrone, M. / Modified stark procedure for caesarean section. First Italian experience. In: Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 1997 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 95-102.
@article{da3bc14db02a429fbe416b4f4173ce00,
title = "Modified stark procedure for caesarean section. First Italian experience",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the validity of a modified Stark procedure for caesarean section, based on anatomical principles and the elimination of unnecessary surgical steps. Methods: The surgical outcome of 127 cases submitted to this procedure was compared to 95 traditional caesarean sections. We analysed total operating time, fetal extraction time, surgical material consumption, maternal blood loss, postoperative febrile morbidity and recovery in both groups. Results: Mean total operating time was 19.4 min (range 11-28) in the Stark cases and 51.7 min (range 33-80) in the control group (p <0.001). Fetal extraction time was also reduced in the Stark technique: mean time was 3.2 min (range 1-7), while in the traditional procedures it was 6.5 min (range 2-18) (p <0.001). Among the Stark cases a mean of 3.5 threads was used (range 3-6), while in the control group 9.2 (range 6-19) (p <0.001). Maternal blood loss, postoperative febrile morbidity and recovery were significantly improved in the group submitted to the modified Stark procedure. Conclusions: The theoretical background of the innovative Stark procedure seems to be confirmed by our results: the Stark procedure is associated with a significant reduction of morbidity and an improved outcome.",
keywords = "Caesarean section, Laparotomy, Obstetric surgery, Surgical morbidity",
author = "Ferrari, {A. G.} and L. Frigerio and G. Candotti and M. Origoni and A. Mariani and M. Petrone",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "95--102",
journal = "Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics",
issn = "1121-8339",
publisher = "CIC Edizioni Internazionali s.r.l.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modified stark procedure for caesarean section. First Italian experience

AU - Ferrari, A. G.

AU - Frigerio, L.

AU - Candotti, G.

AU - Origoni, M.

AU - Mariani, A.

AU - Petrone, M.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Objective: To assess the validity of a modified Stark procedure for caesarean section, based on anatomical principles and the elimination of unnecessary surgical steps. Methods: The surgical outcome of 127 cases submitted to this procedure was compared to 95 traditional caesarean sections. We analysed total operating time, fetal extraction time, surgical material consumption, maternal blood loss, postoperative febrile morbidity and recovery in both groups. Results: Mean total operating time was 19.4 min (range 11-28) in the Stark cases and 51.7 min (range 33-80) in the control group (p <0.001). Fetal extraction time was also reduced in the Stark technique: mean time was 3.2 min (range 1-7), while in the traditional procedures it was 6.5 min (range 2-18) (p <0.001). Among the Stark cases a mean of 3.5 threads was used (range 3-6), while in the control group 9.2 (range 6-19) (p <0.001). Maternal blood loss, postoperative febrile morbidity and recovery were significantly improved in the group submitted to the modified Stark procedure. Conclusions: The theoretical background of the innovative Stark procedure seems to be confirmed by our results: the Stark procedure is associated with a significant reduction of morbidity and an improved outcome.

AB - Objective: To assess the validity of a modified Stark procedure for caesarean section, based on anatomical principles and the elimination of unnecessary surgical steps. Methods: The surgical outcome of 127 cases submitted to this procedure was compared to 95 traditional caesarean sections. We analysed total operating time, fetal extraction time, surgical material consumption, maternal blood loss, postoperative febrile morbidity and recovery in both groups. Results: Mean total operating time was 19.4 min (range 11-28) in the Stark cases and 51.7 min (range 33-80) in the control group (p <0.001). Fetal extraction time was also reduced in the Stark technique: mean time was 3.2 min (range 1-7), while in the traditional procedures it was 6.5 min (range 2-18) (p <0.001). Among the Stark cases a mean of 3.5 threads was used (range 3-6), while in the control group 9.2 (range 6-19) (p <0.001). Maternal blood loss, postoperative febrile morbidity and recovery were significantly improved in the group submitted to the modified Stark procedure. Conclusions: The theoretical background of the innovative Stark procedure seems to be confirmed by our results: the Stark procedure is associated with a significant reduction of morbidity and an improved outcome.

KW - Caesarean section

KW - Laparotomy

KW - Obstetric surgery

KW - Surgical morbidity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030712470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030712470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030712470

VL - 9

SP - 95

EP - 102

JO - Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics

JF - Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics

SN - 1121-8339

IS - 3

ER -