Modularity for sensorimotor control: Evidence and a new prediction

Andrea D'Avella, Dinesh K. Pai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

By combining a few modules, the CNS may learn new control policies quickly and efficiently. Support for a modular organization of the motor system has recently come from the observation of low dimensionality in the motor commands. However, stronger evidence would come from testing the predictions on the effect of an intervention on the mechanisms required to implement a modular controller. Thus, the authors propose to test the predictions of modularity on motor adaptation. They argue that unlike a nonmodular controller, a modular controller must adapt faster to a perturbation that is compatible with the modules (i.e., one that can be compensated by reusing the same modules), than to an incompatible perturbation (i.e., one that requires new modules).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-369
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Motor Behavior
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Observation
Organizations

Keywords

  • hierarchical control policy
  • motor adaptation
  • muscle synergies
  • task perturbations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Biophysics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Modularity for sensorimotor control : Evidence and a new prediction. / D'Avella, Andrea; Pai, Dinesh K.

In: Journal of Motor Behavior, Vol. 42, No. 6, 11.2010, p. 361-369.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{def84ec4819c404bace1233ecef5b124,
title = "Modularity for sensorimotor control: Evidence and a new prediction",
abstract = "By combining a few modules, the CNS may learn new control policies quickly and efficiently. Support for a modular organization of the motor system has recently come from the observation of low dimensionality in the motor commands. However, stronger evidence would come from testing the predictions on the effect of an intervention on the mechanisms required to implement a modular controller. Thus, the authors propose to test the predictions of modularity on motor adaptation. They argue that unlike a nonmodular controller, a modular controller must adapt faster to a perturbation that is compatible with the modules (i.e., one that can be compensated by reusing the same modules), than to an incompatible perturbation (i.e., one that requires new modules).",
keywords = "hierarchical control policy, motor adaptation, muscle synergies, task perturbations",
author = "Andrea D'Avella and Pai, {Dinesh K.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/00222895.2010.526453",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "361--369",
journal = "Journal of Motor Behavior",
issn = "0022-2895",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modularity for sensorimotor control

T2 - Evidence and a new prediction

AU - D'Avella, Andrea

AU - Pai, Dinesh K.

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - By combining a few modules, the CNS may learn new control policies quickly and efficiently. Support for a modular organization of the motor system has recently come from the observation of low dimensionality in the motor commands. However, stronger evidence would come from testing the predictions on the effect of an intervention on the mechanisms required to implement a modular controller. Thus, the authors propose to test the predictions of modularity on motor adaptation. They argue that unlike a nonmodular controller, a modular controller must adapt faster to a perturbation that is compatible with the modules (i.e., one that can be compensated by reusing the same modules), than to an incompatible perturbation (i.e., one that requires new modules).

AB - By combining a few modules, the CNS may learn new control policies quickly and efficiently. Support for a modular organization of the motor system has recently come from the observation of low dimensionality in the motor commands. However, stronger evidence would come from testing the predictions on the effect of an intervention on the mechanisms required to implement a modular controller. Thus, the authors propose to test the predictions of modularity on motor adaptation. They argue that unlike a nonmodular controller, a modular controller must adapt faster to a perturbation that is compatible with the modules (i.e., one that can be compensated by reusing the same modules), than to an incompatible perturbation (i.e., one that requires new modules).

KW - hierarchical control policy

KW - motor adaptation

KW - muscle synergies

KW - task perturbations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649521095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649521095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00222895.2010.526453

DO - 10.1080/00222895.2010.526453

M3 - Article

C2 - 21184354

AN - SCOPUS:78649521095

VL - 42

SP - 361

EP - 369

JO - Journal of Motor Behavior

JF - Journal of Motor Behavior

SN - 0022-2895

IS - 6

ER -