Mosaic 22q13 deletions: Evidence for concurrent mosaic segmental isodisomy and gene conversion

Maria Clara Bonaglia, Roberto Giorda, Silvana Beri, Stefania Bigoni, Alberto Sensi, Anna Baroncini, Antonella Capucci, Cristina De Agostini, Rhian Gwilliam, Panos Deloukas, Ian Dunham, Orsetta Zuffardi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although 22q terminal deletions are well documented, very few patients with mosaicism have been reported. We describe two new cases with mosaic 22q13.2-qter deletion, detected by karyotype analysis, showing the neurological phenotype of 22q13.3 deletion syndrome. Case 1 represents an exceptional case of mosaicism for maternal 22q13.2-qter deletion (45% of cells) and 22q13.2-qter paternal segmental isodisomy (55% of cells). This complex situation was suspected because cytogenetic, FISH and array-CGH analyses showed the presence of an 8.8 Mb mosaic 22q13.2-qter deletion, whereas microsatellite marker analysis was consistent with maternal deletion without any evidence of mosaic deletion. Molecular analysis led to the definition of very close, but not coincident, deletion and uniparental disomy (UPD) break points. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the segmental UPD arose by gene conversion in the same region. In Case 2, mosaicism for a paternal 8.9 Mb 22q13.2-qter deletion (73% of cells) was detected. In both patients, the level of mosaicism was also verified in saliva samples. We propose possible causative mechanisms for both rearrangements. Although the size of the deletions was quite similar, the phenotype was more severe in Case 2 than in Case 1. As maternal UPD 22 has not been generally associated with any defects and as the size of the deletion is very similar in the two cases, phenotype severity is likely to depend entirely on the degree of mosaicism in each individual.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)426-433
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Human Genetics
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Gene Conversion
Mosaicism
Uniparental Disomy
Mothers
Phenotype
Karyotype
Saliva
Cytogenetics
Microsatellite Repeats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Genetics

Cite this

Mosaic 22q13 deletions : Evidence for concurrent mosaic segmental isodisomy and gene conversion. / Bonaglia, Maria Clara; Giorda, Roberto; Beri, Silvana; Bigoni, Stefania; Sensi, Alberto; Baroncini, Anna; Capucci, Antonella; De Agostini, Cristina; Gwilliam, Rhian; Deloukas, Panos; Dunham, Ian; Zuffardi, Orsetta.

In: European Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2009, p. 426-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bonaglia, MC, Giorda, R, Beri, S, Bigoni, S, Sensi, A, Baroncini, A, Capucci, A, De Agostini, C, Gwilliam, R, Deloukas, P, Dunham, I & Zuffardi, O 2009, 'Mosaic 22q13 deletions: Evidence for concurrent mosaic segmental isodisomy and gene conversion', European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 426-433. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2008.195
Bonaglia, Maria Clara ; Giorda, Roberto ; Beri, Silvana ; Bigoni, Stefania ; Sensi, Alberto ; Baroncini, Anna ; Capucci, Antonella ; De Agostini, Cristina ; Gwilliam, Rhian ; Deloukas, Panos ; Dunham, Ian ; Zuffardi, Orsetta. / Mosaic 22q13 deletions : Evidence for concurrent mosaic segmental isodisomy and gene conversion. In: European Journal of Human Genetics. 2009 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 426-433.
@article{b6b53283bdf14c1c8b24e0e7669a88e3,
title = "Mosaic 22q13 deletions: Evidence for concurrent mosaic segmental isodisomy and gene conversion",
abstract = "Although 22q terminal deletions are well documented, very few patients with mosaicism have been reported. We describe two new cases with mosaic 22q13.2-qter deletion, detected by karyotype analysis, showing the neurological phenotype of 22q13.3 deletion syndrome. Case 1 represents an exceptional case of mosaicism for maternal 22q13.2-qter deletion (45{\%} of cells) and 22q13.2-qter paternal segmental isodisomy (55{\%} of cells). This complex situation was suspected because cytogenetic, FISH and array-CGH analyses showed the presence of an 8.8 Mb mosaic 22q13.2-qter deletion, whereas microsatellite marker analysis was consistent with maternal deletion without any evidence of mosaic deletion. Molecular analysis led to the definition of very close, but not coincident, deletion and uniparental disomy (UPD) break points. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the segmental UPD arose by gene conversion in the same region. In Case 2, mosaicism for a paternal 8.9 Mb 22q13.2-qter deletion (73{\%} of cells) was detected. In both patients, the level of mosaicism was also verified in saliva samples. We propose possible causative mechanisms for both rearrangements. Although the size of the deletions was quite similar, the phenotype was more severe in Case 2 than in Case 1. As maternal UPD 22 has not been generally associated with any defects and as the size of the deletion is very similar in the two cases, phenotype severity is likely to depend entirely on the degree of mosaicism in each individual.",
author = "Bonaglia, {Maria Clara} and Roberto Giorda and Silvana Beri and Stefania Bigoni and Alberto Sensi and Anna Baroncini and Antonella Capucci and {De Agostini}, Cristina and Rhian Gwilliam and Panos Deloukas and Ian Dunham and Orsetta Zuffardi",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1038/ejhg.2008.195",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "426--433",
journal = "European Journal of Human Genetics",
issn = "1018-4813",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mosaic 22q13 deletions

T2 - Evidence for concurrent mosaic segmental isodisomy and gene conversion

AU - Bonaglia, Maria Clara

AU - Giorda, Roberto

AU - Beri, Silvana

AU - Bigoni, Stefania

AU - Sensi, Alberto

AU - Baroncini, Anna

AU - Capucci, Antonella

AU - De Agostini, Cristina

AU - Gwilliam, Rhian

AU - Deloukas, Panos

AU - Dunham, Ian

AU - Zuffardi, Orsetta

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Although 22q terminal deletions are well documented, very few patients with mosaicism have been reported. We describe two new cases with mosaic 22q13.2-qter deletion, detected by karyotype analysis, showing the neurological phenotype of 22q13.3 deletion syndrome. Case 1 represents an exceptional case of mosaicism for maternal 22q13.2-qter deletion (45% of cells) and 22q13.2-qter paternal segmental isodisomy (55% of cells). This complex situation was suspected because cytogenetic, FISH and array-CGH analyses showed the presence of an 8.8 Mb mosaic 22q13.2-qter deletion, whereas microsatellite marker analysis was consistent with maternal deletion without any evidence of mosaic deletion. Molecular analysis led to the definition of very close, but not coincident, deletion and uniparental disomy (UPD) break points. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the segmental UPD arose by gene conversion in the same region. In Case 2, mosaicism for a paternal 8.9 Mb 22q13.2-qter deletion (73% of cells) was detected. In both patients, the level of mosaicism was also verified in saliva samples. We propose possible causative mechanisms for both rearrangements. Although the size of the deletions was quite similar, the phenotype was more severe in Case 2 than in Case 1. As maternal UPD 22 has not been generally associated with any defects and as the size of the deletion is very similar in the two cases, phenotype severity is likely to depend entirely on the degree of mosaicism in each individual.

AB - Although 22q terminal deletions are well documented, very few patients with mosaicism have been reported. We describe two new cases with mosaic 22q13.2-qter deletion, detected by karyotype analysis, showing the neurological phenotype of 22q13.3 deletion syndrome. Case 1 represents an exceptional case of mosaicism for maternal 22q13.2-qter deletion (45% of cells) and 22q13.2-qter paternal segmental isodisomy (55% of cells). This complex situation was suspected because cytogenetic, FISH and array-CGH analyses showed the presence of an 8.8 Mb mosaic 22q13.2-qter deletion, whereas microsatellite marker analysis was consistent with maternal deletion without any evidence of mosaic deletion. Molecular analysis led to the definition of very close, but not coincident, deletion and uniparental disomy (UPD) break points. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the segmental UPD arose by gene conversion in the same region. In Case 2, mosaicism for a paternal 8.9 Mb 22q13.2-qter deletion (73% of cells) was detected. In both patients, the level of mosaicism was also verified in saliva samples. We propose possible causative mechanisms for both rearrangements. Although the size of the deletions was quite similar, the phenotype was more severe in Case 2 than in Case 1. As maternal UPD 22 has not been generally associated with any defects and as the size of the deletion is very similar in the two cases, phenotype severity is likely to depend entirely on the degree of mosaicism in each individual.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62849085795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62849085795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ejhg.2008.195

DO - 10.1038/ejhg.2008.195

M3 - Article

C2 - 18854866

AN - SCOPUS:62849085795

VL - 17

SP - 426

EP - 433

JO - European Journal of Human Genetics

JF - European Journal of Human Genetics

SN - 1018-4813

IS - 4

ER -