Motor control performance in the lower extremity: Normals vs. anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees 5-8 years from the index surgery

M. Denti, P. Randelli, D. Lo Vetere, M. Moioli, I. Bagnoli, P. W. Cawley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared motor control function in 50 patients who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-tendon-bone graft to that in 50 normal controls. Surgical subjects patients had undergone reconstruction with a one-(n=37) or two-incision (n=13) technique with the same rehabilitation protocol; mean time from the index surgery was 6.1 years (range of 5-8 years). For inclusion patients required an excellent outcome, category A IKDC score, and a KT-1000 side-to-side difference of 3 mm or less. Motor control evaluations were conducted using the KAT 2000 with static and dynamic tests. Normal controls had substantially better scores than did the surgical patients. There was no statistical difference the single-limb static test between scores of operated and nonoperated limbs. However, the operated limb scores were slightly better overall than those for the nonoperated limb, and the right knee scores tended to be better than those for the left knee. This may be explained by limb dominance. The test method employed in this investigation shows that anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed patients had a clear motor control deficit compared to normal control subjects even after several years.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)296-300
Number of pages5
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume8
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Lower Extremity
Knee
Extremities
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Tendons
Rehabilitation
Transplants
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Anterior cruciate ligament
  • Motor control performance
  • Reconstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Motor control performance in the lower extremity : Normals vs. anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees 5-8 years from the index surgery. / Denti, M.; Randelli, P.; Lo Vetere, D.; Moioli, M.; Bagnoli, I.; Cawley, P. W.

In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2000, p. 296-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Denti, M. ; Randelli, P. ; Lo Vetere, D. ; Moioli, M. ; Bagnoli, I. ; Cawley, P. W. / Motor control performance in the lower extremity : Normals vs. anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees 5-8 years from the index surgery. In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2000 ; Vol. 8, No. 5. pp. 296-300.
@article{95a89e635d2d45c08115d2946788f3ce,
title = "Motor control performance in the lower extremity: Normals vs. anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees 5-8 years from the index surgery",
abstract = "We compared motor control function in 50 patients who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-tendon-bone graft to that in 50 normal controls. Surgical subjects patients had undergone reconstruction with a one-(n=37) or two-incision (n=13) technique with the same rehabilitation protocol; mean time from the index surgery was 6.1 years (range of 5-8 years). For inclusion patients required an excellent outcome, category A IKDC score, and a KT-1000 side-to-side difference of 3 mm or less. Motor control evaluations were conducted using the KAT 2000 with static and dynamic tests. Normal controls had substantially better scores than did the surgical patients. There was no statistical difference the single-limb static test between scores of operated and nonoperated limbs. However, the operated limb scores were slightly better overall than those for the nonoperated limb, and the right knee scores tended to be better than those for the left knee. This may be explained by limb dominance. The test method employed in this investigation shows that anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed patients had a clear motor control deficit compared to normal control subjects even after several years.",
keywords = "Anterior cruciate ligament, Motor control performance, Reconstruction",
author = "M. Denti and P. Randelli and {Lo Vetere}, D. and M. Moioli and I. Bagnoli and Cawley, {P. W.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "296--300",
journal = "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy",
issn = "0942-2056",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor control performance in the lower extremity

T2 - Normals vs. anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees 5-8 years from the index surgery

AU - Denti, M.

AU - Randelli, P.

AU - Lo Vetere, D.

AU - Moioli, M.

AU - Bagnoli, I.

AU - Cawley, P. W.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - We compared motor control function in 50 patients who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-tendon-bone graft to that in 50 normal controls. Surgical subjects patients had undergone reconstruction with a one-(n=37) or two-incision (n=13) technique with the same rehabilitation protocol; mean time from the index surgery was 6.1 years (range of 5-8 years). For inclusion patients required an excellent outcome, category A IKDC score, and a KT-1000 side-to-side difference of 3 mm or less. Motor control evaluations were conducted using the KAT 2000 with static and dynamic tests. Normal controls had substantially better scores than did the surgical patients. There was no statistical difference the single-limb static test between scores of operated and nonoperated limbs. However, the operated limb scores were slightly better overall than those for the nonoperated limb, and the right knee scores tended to be better than those for the left knee. This may be explained by limb dominance. The test method employed in this investigation shows that anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed patients had a clear motor control deficit compared to normal control subjects even after several years.

AB - We compared motor control function in 50 patients who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-tendon-bone graft to that in 50 normal controls. Surgical subjects patients had undergone reconstruction with a one-(n=37) or two-incision (n=13) technique with the same rehabilitation protocol; mean time from the index surgery was 6.1 years (range of 5-8 years). For inclusion patients required an excellent outcome, category A IKDC score, and a KT-1000 side-to-side difference of 3 mm or less. Motor control evaluations were conducted using the KAT 2000 with static and dynamic tests. Normal controls had substantially better scores than did the surgical patients. There was no statistical difference the single-limb static test between scores of operated and nonoperated limbs. However, the operated limb scores were slightly better overall than those for the nonoperated limb, and the right knee scores tended to be better than those for the left knee. This may be explained by limb dominance. The test method employed in this investigation shows that anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed patients had a clear motor control deficit compared to normal control subjects even after several years.

KW - Anterior cruciate ligament

KW - Motor control performance

KW - Reconstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034571861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034571861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11061299

AN - SCOPUS:0034571861

VL - 8

SP - 296

EP - 300

JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

SN - 0942-2056

IS - 5

ER -