Valutazione multicentrica dei conteggi cellulari ottenuti con 8 analizzatori ematologici automatici

Sabrina Buoro; Silvia Pipitone; Alessandra Fanelli; Sara Francione; Giorgio Da Rin; Annamaria Di Fabio; Fabiana Fiorini; Alessandra Marini; Angela Papa; Michela Seghezzi; Anna Benegiamo; Benedetta Peruzzi; Marco Borin; Fosca Siviero; Lucia Francioni; Tiziana Lari; Franca Cocci; Fiamma Balboni; Maria Laura Ciardelli; Francesco Dima; Luca Germagnoli; Maria Gioia; Antonio La Gioia

doi:10.19186/BC-2016.029

Valutazione multicentrica dei conteggi cellulari ottenuti con 8 analizzatori ematologici automatici

Translated title of the contribution: Multicenter evaluation of blood cell counts on 8 automated hematology analyzers

Sabrina Buoro, Silvia Pipitone, Alessandra Fanelli, Sara Francione, Giorgio Da Rin, Annamaria Di Fabio, Fabiana Fiorini, Alessandra Marini, Angela Papa, Michela Seghezzi, Anna Benegiamo, Benedetta Peruzzi, Marco Borin, Fosca Siviero, Lucia Francioni, Tiziana Lari, Franca Cocci, Fiamma Balboni, Maria Laura Ciardelli, Francesco DimaLuca Germagnoli, Maria Gioia, Antonio La Gioia

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The cellular analysis performed on hematology analyzers is based on the interaction of cells with electrical or optical signals. The heterogeneity of adopted methods and technologies by different analyzers can translate in a lack of homogeneity in analytical performance. This study compares 8 hematological analyzers vs. optical microscopy (OM) and, where possible, also compares the analyzers among each other. Correlations were assessed by Pearson's coefficient of correlation, Passing and Bablock regression and Bland-Altman bias plot analysis. The comparison among analyzers regarding leukocyte differential counts showed a good level of agreement, except for the basophil cell count. For this "critical population", the bias ranged from -5,8% (Cell-Dyn Sapphire vs. XN-9000) to 30,6% (Advia 2120i vs. XE- 2100). The comparison between automated differential leukocyte counts and OM showed also a good level of agreement, with a bias ranging from -0,9% to 8.9%. The bias for basophil cell count was however very high (79.5%).

Translated title of the contribution	Multicenter evaluation of blood cell counts on 8 automated hematology analyzers
Original language	Italian
Pages (from-to)	195-203
Number of pages	9
Journal	Biochimica Clinica
Volume	40
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.19186/BC-2016.029
Publication status	Published - Jan 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Clinical Biochemistry
Medical Laboratory Technology
Biochemistry, medical

Access to Document

10.19186/BC-2016.029

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Multicenter evaluation of blood cell counts on 8 automated hematology analyzers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Buoro, S., Pipitone, S., Fanelli, A., Francione, S., Rin, G. D., Di Fabio, A., Fiorini, F., Marini, A., Papa, A., Seghezzi, M., Benegiamo, A., Peruzzi, B., Borin, M., Siviero, F., Francioni, L., Lari, T., Cocci, F., Balboni, F., Ciardelli, M. L., ... Gioia, A. L. (2016). Valutazione multicentrica dei conteggi cellulari ottenuti con 8 analizzatori ematologici automatici. Biochimica Clinica, 40(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.19186/BC-2016.029

Valutazione multicentrica dei conteggi cellulari ottenuti con 8 analizzatori ematologici automatici. / Buoro, Sabrina; Pipitone, Silvia; Fanelli, Alessandra; Francione, Sara; Rin, Giorgio Da; Di Fabio, Annamaria; Fiorini, Fabiana; Marini, Alessandra; Papa, Angela; Seghezzi, Michela; Benegiamo, Anna; Peruzzi, Benedetta; Borin, Marco; Siviero, Fosca; Francioni, Lucia; Lari, Tiziana; Cocci, Franca; Balboni, Fiamma; Ciardelli, Maria Laura; Dima, Francesco; Germagnoli, Luca; Gioia, Maria; Gioia, Antonio La.

In: Biochimica Clinica, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.01.2016, p. 195-203.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Buoro, S, Pipitone, S, Fanelli, A, Francione, S, Rin, GD, Di Fabio, A, Fiorini, F, Marini, A, Papa, A, Seghezzi, M, Benegiamo, A, Peruzzi, B, Borin, M, Siviero, F, Francioni, L, Lari, T, Cocci, F, Balboni, F, Ciardelli, ML, Dima, F, Germagnoli, L, Gioia, M & Gioia, AL 2016, 'Valutazione multicentrica dei conteggi cellulari ottenuti con 8 analizzatori ematologici automatici', Biochimica Clinica, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 195-203. https://doi.org/10.19186/BC-2016.029

Buoro, Sabrina ; Pipitone, Silvia ; Fanelli, Alessandra ; Francione, Sara ; Rin, Giorgio Da ; Di Fabio, Annamaria ; Fiorini, Fabiana ; Marini, Alessandra ; Papa, Angela ; Seghezzi, Michela ; Benegiamo, Anna ; Peruzzi, Benedetta ; Borin, Marco ; Siviero, Fosca ; Francioni, Lucia ; Lari, Tiziana ; Cocci, Franca ; Balboni, Fiamma ; Ciardelli, Maria Laura ; Dima, Francesco ; Germagnoli, Luca ; Gioia, Maria ; Gioia, Antonio La. / Valutazione multicentrica dei conteggi cellulari ottenuti con 8 analizzatori ematologici automatici. In: Biochimica Clinica. 2016 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 195-203.

@article{6a2655703d5d4d77bf6da14476d3b383,

title = "Valutazione multicentrica dei conteggi cellulari ottenuti con 8 analizzatori ematologici automatici",

abstract = "The cellular analysis performed on hematology analyzers is based on the interaction of cells with electrical or optical signals. The heterogeneity of adopted methods and technologies by different analyzers can translate in a lack of homogeneity in analytical performance. This study compares 8 hematological analyzers vs. optical microscopy (OM) and, where possible, also compares the analyzers among each other. Correlations were assessed by Pearson's coefficient of correlation, Passing and Bablock regression and Bland-Altman bias plot analysis. The comparison among analyzers regarding leukocyte differential counts showed a good level of agreement, except for the basophil cell count. For this {"}critical population{"}, the bias ranged from -5,8% (Cell-Dyn Sapphire vs. XN-9000) to 30,6% (Advia 2120i vs. XE- 2100). The comparison between automated differential leukocyte counts and OM showed also a good level of agreement, with a bias ranging from -0,9% to 8.9%. The bias for basophil cell count was however very high (79.5%).",

author = "Sabrina Buoro and Silvia Pipitone and Alessandra Fanelli and Sara Francione and Rin, {Giorgio Da} and {Di Fabio}, Annamaria and Fabiana Fiorini and Alessandra Marini and Angela Papa and Michela Seghezzi and Anna Benegiamo and Benedetta Peruzzi and Marco Borin and Fosca Siviero and Lucia Francioni and Tiziana Lari and Franca Cocci and Fiamma Balboni and Ciardelli, {Maria Laura} and Francesco Dima and Luca Germagnoli and Maria Gioia and Gioia, {Antonio La}",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.19186/BC-2016.029",

language = "Italian",

volume = "40",

pages = "195--203",

journal = "Biochimica Clinica",

issn = "0393-0564",

publisher = "CLAS International",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valutazione multicentrica dei conteggi cellulari ottenuti con 8 analizzatori ematologici automatici

AU - Buoro, Sabrina

AU - Pipitone, Silvia

AU - Fanelli, Alessandra

AU - Francione, Sara

AU - Rin, Giorgio Da

AU - Di Fabio, Annamaria

AU - Fiorini, Fabiana

AU - Marini, Alessandra

AU - Papa, Angela

AU - Seghezzi, Michela

AU - Benegiamo, Anna

AU - Peruzzi, Benedetta

AU - Borin, Marco

AU - Siviero, Fosca

AU - Francioni, Lucia

AU - Lari, Tiziana

AU - Cocci, Franca

AU - Balboni, Fiamma

AU - Ciardelli, Maria Laura

AU - Dima, Francesco

AU - Germagnoli, Luca

AU - Gioia, Maria

AU - Gioia, Antonio La

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - The cellular analysis performed on hematology analyzers is based on the interaction of cells with electrical or optical signals. The heterogeneity of adopted methods and technologies by different analyzers can translate in a lack of homogeneity in analytical performance. This study compares 8 hematological analyzers vs. optical microscopy (OM) and, where possible, also compares the analyzers among each other. Correlations were assessed by Pearson's coefficient of correlation, Passing and Bablock regression and Bland-Altman bias plot analysis. The comparison among analyzers regarding leukocyte differential counts showed a good level of agreement, except for the basophil cell count. For this "critical population", the bias ranged from -5,8% (Cell-Dyn Sapphire vs. XN-9000) to 30,6% (Advia 2120i vs. XE- 2100). The comparison between automated differential leukocyte counts and OM showed also a good level of agreement, with a bias ranging from -0,9% to 8.9%. The bias for basophil cell count was however very high (79.5%).

AB - The cellular analysis performed on hematology analyzers is based on the interaction of cells with electrical or optical signals. The heterogeneity of adopted methods and technologies by different analyzers can translate in a lack of homogeneity in analytical performance. This study compares 8 hematological analyzers vs. optical microscopy (OM) and, where possible, also compares the analyzers among each other. Correlations were assessed by Pearson's coefficient of correlation, Passing and Bablock regression and Bland-Altman bias plot analysis. The comparison among analyzers regarding leukocyte differential counts showed a good level of agreement, except for the basophil cell count. For this "critical population", the bias ranged from -5,8% (Cell-Dyn Sapphire vs. XN-9000) to 30,6% (Advia 2120i vs. XE- 2100). The comparison between automated differential leukocyte counts and OM showed also a good level of agreement, with a bias ranging from -0,9% to 8.9%. The bias for basophil cell count was however very high (79.5%).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994589001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994589001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.19186/BC-2016.029

DO - 10.19186/BC-2016.029

M3 - Articolo

AN - SCOPUS:84994589001

VL - 40

SP - 195

EP - 203

JO - Biochimica Clinica

JF - Biochimica Clinica

SN - 0393-0564

IS - 3

ER -