Multicentre retrospective study on endoscopic ultrasound complications

E. Buscarini, C. De Angelis, P. G. Arcidiacono, R. Rocca, G. Lupinacci, R. Manta, P. Carucci, A. Repici, S. Carrara, D. Vallisa, L. Buscarini, F. Cosentino, A. Pera, M. Rizzetto, P. A. Testoni, A. Zambelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasonography, both conventional and interventional, has been used increasingly during the past 20 years and is deemed a safe technique. Its complication rate, however, has been studied to only a limited extent. This multicentre investigation sought to establish the complication rate for a large number of endoscopic ultrasonography procedures. Methods: By means of a questionnaire, we collected data from six centres on the number of endoscopic ultrasonography examinations performed and divided them into conventional and interventional examinations of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Information was obtained on technical modalities such as instruments and sedation and, for interventional endoscopic ultrasonography, indications, pre-procedural exams and technical details (needle calibre, number of passes) had to be specified. Complications were classified as mild, moderate, severe or fatal and their onset as immediate, early or late. Variables that entered into the analysis of complication rate included type of endoscopic ultrasonography instrument used, type and site of lesion biopsied, number of needle passes and operator experience. Results: Eleven thousand five hundred thirty nine endoscopic ultrasonographic procedures were reported, of which 10,731 were conventional and 808 interventional. No deaths occurred; there were 14 (0.12%) complications, 5 (0.046%) of them following conventional endoscopic ultrasonography and 9 (1.11%) after interventional endoscopic ultrasonography. Seven complications were mild, four moderate and three severe. Conclusions: Both conventional and interventional endoscopic ultrasonography were confirmed to be acceptably safe techniques.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)762-767
Number of pages6
JournalDigestive and Liver Disease
Volume38
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

Fingerprint

Endosonography
Multicenter Studies
Retrospective Studies
Interventional Ultrasonography
Needles
Lower Gastrointestinal Tract
Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Endoscopic ultrasonography
  • EUS
  • EUS-FNA
  • Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Buscarini, E., De Angelis, C., Arcidiacono, P. G., Rocca, R., Lupinacci, G., Manta, R., ... Zambelli, A. (2006). Multicentre retrospective study on endoscopic ultrasound complications. Digestive and Liver Disease, 38(10), 762-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2006.06.005

Multicentre retrospective study on endoscopic ultrasound complications. / Buscarini, E.; De Angelis, C.; Arcidiacono, P. G.; Rocca, R.; Lupinacci, G.; Manta, R.; Carucci, P.; Repici, A.; Carrara, S.; Vallisa, D.; Buscarini, L.; Cosentino, F.; Pera, A.; Rizzetto, M.; Testoni, P. A.; Zambelli, A.

In: Digestive and Liver Disease, Vol. 38, No. 10, 10.2006, p. 762-767.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buscarini, E, De Angelis, C, Arcidiacono, PG, Rocca, R, Lupinacci, G, Manta, R, Carucci, P, Repici, A, Carrara, S, Vallisa, D, Buscarini, L, Cosentino, F, Pera, A, Rizzetto, M, Testoni, PA & Zambelli, A 2006, 'Multicentre retrospective study on endoscopic ultrasound complications', Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 762-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2006.06.005
Buscarini, E. ; De Angelis, C. ; Arcidiacono, P. G. ; Rocca, R. ; Lupinacci, G. ; Manta, R. ; Carucci, P. ; Repici, A. ; Carrara, S. ; Vallisa, D. ; Buscarini, L. ; Cosentino, F. ; Pera, A. ; Rizzetto, M. ; Testoni, P. A. ; Zambelli, A. / Multicentre retrospective study on endoscopic ultrasound complications. In: Digestive and Liver Disease. 2006 ; Vol. 38, No. 10. pp. 762-767.
@article{de0b5ff999904341934534da070cc255,
title = "Multicentre retrospective study on endoscopic ultrasound complications",
abstract = "Background: Endoscopic ultrasonography, both conventional and interventional, has been used increasingly during the past 20 years and is deemed a safe technique. Its complication rate, however, has been studied to only a limited extent. This multicentre investigation sought to establish the complication rate for a large number of endoscopic ultrasonography procedures. Methods: By means of a questionnaire, we collected data from six centres on the number of endoscopic ultrasonography examinations performed and divided them into conventional and interventional examinations of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Information was obtained on technical modalities such as instruments and sedation and, for interventional endoscopic ultrasonography, indications, pre-procedural exams and technical details (needle calibre, number of passes) had to be specified. Complications were classified as mild, moderate, severe or fatal and their onset as immediate, early or late. Variables that entered into the analysis of complication rate included type of endoscopic ultrasonography instrument used, type and site of lesion biopsied, number of needle passes and operator experience. Results: Eleven thousand five hundred thirty nine endoscopic ultrasonographic procedures were reported, of which 10,731 were conventional and 808 interventional. No deaths occurred; there were 14 (0.12{\%}) complications, 5 (0.046{\%}) of them following conventional endoscopic ultrasonography and 9 (1.11{\%}) after interventional endoscopic ultrasonography. Seven complications were mild, four moderate and three severe. Conclusions: Both conventional and interventional endoscopic ultrasonography were confirmed to be acceptably safe techniques.",
keywords = "Complications, Endoscopic ultrasonography, EUS, EUS-FNA, Training",
author = "E. Buscarini and {De Angelis}, C. and Arcidiacono, {P. G.} and R. Rocca and G. Lupinacci and R. Manta and P. Carucci and A. Repici and S. Carrara and D. Vallisa and L. Buscarini and F. Cosentino and A. Pera and M. Rizzetto and Testoni, {P. A.} and A. Zambelli",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.dld.2006.06.005",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "762--767",
journal = "Digestive and Liver Disease",
issn = "1590-8658",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicentre retrospective study on endoscopic ultrasound complications

AU - Buscarini, E.

AU - De Angelis, C.

AU - Arcidiacono, P. G.

AU - Rocca, R.

AU - Lupinacci, G.

AU - Manta, R.

AU - Carucci, P.

AU - Repici, A.

AU - Carrara, S.

AU - Vallisa, D.

AU - Buscarini, L.

AU - Cosentino, F.

AU - Pera, A.

AU - Rizzetto, M.

AU - Testoni, P. A.

AU - Zambelli, A.

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - Background: Endoscopic ultrasonography, both conventional and interventional, has been used increasingly during the past 20 years and is deemed a safe technique. Its complication rate, however, has been studied to only a limited extent. This multicentre investigation sought to establish the complication rate for a large number of endoscopic ultrasonography procedures. Methods: By means of a questionnaire, we collected data from six centres on the number of endoscopic ultrasonography examinations performed and divided them into conventional and interventional examinations of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Information was obtained on technical modalities such as instruments and sedation and, for interventional endoscopic ultrasonography, indications, pre-procedural exams and technical details (needle calibre, number of passes) had to be specified. Complications were classified as mild, moderate, severe or fatal and their onset as immediate, early or late. Variables that entered into the analysis of complication rate included type of endoscopic ultrasonography instrument used, type and site of lesion biopsied, number of needle passes and operator experience. Results: Eleven thousand five hundred thirty nine endoscopic ultrasonographic procedures were reported, of which 10,731 were conventional and 808 interventional. No deaths occurred; there were 14 (0.12%) complications, 5 (0.046%) of them following conventional endoscopic ultrasonography and 9 (1.11%) after interventional endoscopic ultrasonography. Seven complications were mild, four moderate and three severe. Conclusions: Both conventional and interventional endoscopic ultrasonography were confirmed to be acceptably safe techniques.

AB - Background: Endoscopic ultrasonography, both conventional and interventional, has been used increasingly during the past 20 years and is deemed a safe technique. Its complication rate, however, has been studied to only a limited extent. This multicentre investigation sought to establish the complication rate for a large number of endoscopic ultrasonography procedures. Methods: By means of a questionnaire, we collected data from six centres on the number of endoscopic ultrasonography examinations performed and divided them into conventional and interventional examinations of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Information was obtained on technical modalities such as instruments and sedation and, for interventional endoscopic ultrasonography, indications, pre-procedural exams and technical details (needle calibre, number of passes) had to be specified. Complications were classified as mild, moderate, severe or fatal and their onset as immediate, early or late. Variables that entered into the analysis of complication rate included type of endoscopic ultrasonography instrument used, type and site of lesion biopsied, number of needle passes and operator experience. Results: Eleven thousand five hundred thirty nine endoscopic ultrasonographic procedures were reported, of which 10,731 were conventional and 808 interventional. No deaths occurred; there were 14 (0.12%) complications, 5 (0.046%) of them following conventional endoscopic ultrasonography and 9 (1.11%) after interventional endoscopic ultrasonography. Seven complications were mild, four moderate and three severe. Conclusions: Both conventional and interventional endoscopic ultrasonography were confirmed to be acceptably safe techniques.

KW - Complications

KW - Endoscopic ultrasonography

KW - EUS

KW - EUS-FNA

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748515210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748515210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dld.2006.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.dld.2006.06.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 16843076

AN - SCOPUS:33748515210

VL - 38

SP - 762

EP - 767

JO - Digestive and Liver Disease

JF - Digestive and Liver Disease

SN - 1590-8658

IS - 10

ER -