Multiple-laboratory comparison of in vitro assays utilized to characterize hematopoietic cells in cord blood

Gary Moroff, Hermann Eichler, Anneke Brand, Riitta Kekomäki, James Kurtz, Magdalena Letowska, Derwood Pamphilon, Elizabeth J. Read, Laura Porretti, Lucilla Lecchi, Jo Anna Reems, Ronald Sacher, Shalini Seetharaman, Tsuneo A. Takahashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the variability in results obtained by multiple laboratories is important because cord blood units are distributed worldwide for transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Four exercises were conducted by multiple laboratories to assess assay variability on nucleated cell (NC), mononuclear cell (MNC) by hematology analyzers [HAs], and CD34+ cell (flow cytometry) measurements. Exercise 1 was an intralaboratory exercise in which the reproducibility of cell measurements was determined. Exercises 2 and 3 involved the shipment of identical processed cord blood samples. In Exercise 2, laboratory-specific methods were utilized. In Exercise 3, two commercial CD34+ cell methods (Stem-Kit and TruCOUNT) were used. In Exercise 4, CD34+ cell levels were determined on repetitive regating of identical list-mode files. RESULTS: Intralaboratory reproducibility was highest for NC measurements and lowest for CD34+ cell measurements. In Exercise 2, all laboratories except one utilized HA with an impedance technology and determined comparable results for NC and MNC levels, whereas the other laboratory utilized a HA with an optical counting method. Substantial variation was observed on measuring CD34+ cells with ranges of 32 to 141, 32 to 66, and 25 to 116 CD34+ cells per μL for the three identical samples. In Exercise 3, on the use of one specific commercial assay, the ranges of CD34+ levels were 214 to 411 and 62 to 178 cells per μL for the two identical samples. Nearly all participating laboratories determined comparable CD34+ levels on the use of identical list-mode files. CONCLUSION: These studies indicate that substantial variability in CD34+ cell levels were determined with flow cytometry. The variability in NC and MNC levels was minimal with HA methodology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)507-515
Number of pages9
JournalTransfusion
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Fetal Blood
Hematology
In Vitro Techniques
Flow Cytometry
Electric Impedance
Stem Cells
Transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Immunology

Cite this

Moroff, G., Eichler, H., Brand, A., Kekomäki, R., Kurtz, J., Letowska, M., ... Takahashi, T. A. (2006). Multiple-laboratory comparison of in vitro assays utilized to characterize hematopoietic cells in cord blood. Transfusion, 46(4), 507-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00758.x

Multiple-laboratory comparison of in vitro assays utilized to characterize hematopoietic cells in cord blood. / Moroff, Gary; Eichler, Hermann; Brand, Anneke; Kekomäki, Riitta; Kurtz, James; Letowska, Magdalena; Pamphilon, Derwood; Read, Elizabeth J.; Porretti, Laura; Lecchi, Lucilla; Reems, Jo Anna; Sacher, Ronald; Seetharaman, Shalini; Takahashi, Tsuneo A.

In: Transfusion, Vol. 46, No. 4, 04.2006, p. 507-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moroff, G, Eichler, H, Brand, A, Kekomäki, R, Kurtz, J, Letowska, M, Pamphilon, D, Read, EJ, Porretti, L, Lecchi, L, Reems, JA, Sacher, R, Seetharaman, S & Takahashi, TA 2006, 'Multiple-laboratory comparison of in vitro assays utilized to characterize hematopoietic cells in cord blood', Transfusion, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 507-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00758.x
Moroff, Gary ; Eichler, Hermann ; Brand, Anneke ; Kekomäki, Riitta ; Kurtz, James ; Letowska, Magdalena ; Pamphilon, Derwood ; Read, Elizabeth J. ; Porretti, Laura ; Lecchi, Lucilla ; Reems, Jo Anna ; Sacher, Ronald ; Seetharaman, Shalini ; Takahashi, Tsuneo A. / Multiple-laboratory comparison of in vitro assays utilized to characterize hematopoietic cells in cord blood. In: Transfusion. 2006 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 507-515.
@article{e7102b9174dc4850ab97e00fa0cade31,
title = "Multiple-laboratory comparison of in vitro assays utilized to characterize hematopoietic cells in cord blood",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Understanding the variability in results obtained by multiple laboratories is important because cord blood units are distributed worldwide for transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Four exercises were conducted by multiple laboratories to assess assay variability on nucleated cell (NC), mononuclear cell (MNC) by hematology analyzers [HAs], and CD34+ cell (flow cytometry) measurements. Exercise 1 was an intralaboratory exercise in which the reproducibility of cell measurements was determined. Exercises 2 and 3 involved the shipment of identical processed cord blood samples. In Exercise 2, laboratory-specific methods were utilized. In Exercise 3, two commercial CD34+ cell methods (Stem-Kit and TruCOUNT) were used. In Exercise 4, CD34+ cell levels were determined on repetitive regating of identical list-mode files. RESULTS: Intralaboratory reproducibility was highest for NC measurements and lowest for CD34+ cell measurements. In Exercise 2, all laboratories except one utilized HA with an impedance technology and determined comparable results for NC and MNC levels, whereas the other laboratory utilized a HA with an optical counting method. Substantial variation was observed on measuring CD34+ cells with ranges of 32 to 141, 32 to 66, and 25 to 116 CD34+ cells per μL for the three identical samples. In Exercise 3, on the use of one specific commercial assay, the ranges of CD34+ levels were 214 to 411 and 62 to 178 cells per μL for the two identical samples. Nearly all participating laboratories determined comparable CD34+ levels on the use of identical list-mode files. CONCLUSION: These studies indicate that substantial variability in CD34+ cell levels were determined with flow cytometry. The variability in NC and MNC levels was minimal with HA methodology.",
author = "Gary Moroff and Hermann Eichler and Anneke Brand and Riitta Kekom{\"a}ki and James Kurtz and Magdalena Letowska and Derwood Pamphilon and Read, {Elizabeth J.} and Laura Porretti and Lucilla Lecchi and Reems, {Jo Anna} and Ronald Sacher and Shalini Seetharaman and Takahashi, {Tsuneo A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00758.x",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "507--515",
journal = "Transfusion",
issn = "0041-1132",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple-laboratory comparison of in vitro assays utilized to characterize hematopoietic cells in cord blood

AU - Moroff, Gary

AU - Eichler, Hermann

AU - Brand, Anneke

AU - Kekomäki, Riitta

AU - Kurtz, James

AU - Letowska, Magdalena

AU - Pamphilon, Derwood

AU - Read, Elizabeth J.

AU - Porretti, Laura

AU - Lecchi, Lucilla

AU - Reems, Jo Anna

AU - Sacher, Ronald

AU - Seetharaman, Shalini

AU - Takahashi, Tsuneo A.

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: Understanding the variability in results obtained by multiple laboratories is important because cord blood units are distributed worldwide for transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Four exercises were conducted by multiple laboratories to assess assay variability on nucleated cell (NC), mononuclear cell (MNC) by hematology analyzers [HAs], and CD34+ cell (flow cytometry) measurements. Exercise 1 was an intralaboratory exercise in which the reproducibility of cell measurements was determined. Exercises 2 and 3 involved the shipment of identical processed cord blood samples. In Exercise 2, laboratory-specific methods were utilized. In Exercise 3, two commercial CD34+ cell methods (Stem-Kit and TruCOUNT) were used. In Exercise 4, CD34+ cell levels were determined on repetitive regating of identical list-mode files. RESULTS: Intralaboratory reproducibility was highest for NC measurements and lowest for CD34+ cell measurements. In Exercise 2, all laboratories except one utilized HA with an impedance technology and determined comparable results for NC and MNC levels, whereas the other laboratory utilized a HA with an optical counting method. Substantial variation was observed on measuring CD34+ cells with ranges of 32 to 141, 32 to 66, and 25 to 116 CD34+ cells per μL for the three identical samples. In Exercise 3, on the use of one specific commercial assay, the ranges of CD34+ levels were 214 to 411 and 62 to 178 cells per μL for the two identical samples. Nearly all participating laboratories determined comparable CD34+ levels on the use of identical list-mode files. CONCLUSION: These studies indicate that substantial variability in CD34+ cell levels were determined with flow cytometry. The variability in NC and MNC levels was minimal with HA methodology.

AB - BACKGROUND: Understanding the variability in results obtained by multiple laboratories is important because cord blood units are distributed worldwide for transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Four exercises were conducted by multiple laboratories to assess assay variability on nucleated cell (NC), mononuclear cell (MNC) by hematology analyzers [HAs], and CD34+ cell (flow cytometry) measurements. Exercise 1 was an intralaboratory exercise in which the reproducibility of cell measurements was determined. Exercises 2 and 3 involved the shipment of identical processed cord blood samples. In Exercise 2, laboratory-specific methods were utilized. In Exercise 3, two commercial CD34+ cell methods (Stem-Kit and TruCOUNT) were used. In Exercise 4, CD34+ cell levels were determined on repetitive regating of identical list-mode files. RESULTS: Intralaboratory reproducibility was highest for NC measurements and lowest for CD34+ cell measurements. In Exercise 2, all laboratories except one utilized HA with an impedance technology and determined comparable results for NC and MNC levels, whereas the other laboratory utilized a HA with an optical counting method. Substantial variation was observed on measuring CD34+ cells with ranges of 32 to 141, 32 to 66, and 25 to 116 CD34+ cells per μL for the three identical samples. In Exercise 3, on the use of one specific commercial assay, the ranges of CD34+ levels were 214 to 411 and 62 to 178 cells per μL for the two identical samples. Nearly all participating laboratories determined comparable CD34+ levels on the use of identical list-mode files. CONCLUSION: These studies indicate that substantial variability in CD34+ cell levels were determined with flow cytometry. The variability in NC and MNC levels was minimal with HA methodology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645289413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645289413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00758.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00758.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16584425

AN - SCOPUS:33645289413

VL - 46

SP - 507

EP - 515

JO - Transfusion

JF - Transfusion

SN - 0041-1132

IS - 4

ER -