Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect

Jean Philippe van Dijck, Fabrizio Doricchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The SNARC effect reflects the observation that when healthy observers with left-to-right reading habits are asked to compare the magnitude or to judge the parity of numbers, they provide faster reaction times (RT) to small numbers with left-sided responses and faster RTs to large numbers with right-sided responses. In magnitude comparison (MC), right brain damaged patients with left-sided neglect typically show a pathologically enlarged SNARC for large numbers and selective slowing to numbers that are immediately lower than the numerical reference (e.g. 4 for reference 5). This asymmetry has been taken as evidence that small numbers are mentally positioned to the left of the reference and, therefore, are processed less efficiently by patients neglecting the left side of space. In parity judgement (PJ), on the other hand, the size of the SNARC effect is unaffected by neglect. This dissociation is typically attributed to the disturbed explicit processing of number magnitude in MC and preserved implicit processing of magnitude in PJ. Before accepting this interpretation, however, it remains to be investigated whether neglect patients show the same RT pattern that characterizes the performance of healthy participants (i.e. left-side RTs that increase linearly as a function of number magnitude and right-side RTs that decrease linearly as a function of magnitude). Clarifying this point is crucial, because an equally sized SNARC can originate from different RT patterns. Here we demonstrate that the RT pattern of neglect patients during PJ is entirely comparable to those of patients without neglect and healthy controls, while the same neglect patients show selective slowing to numbers that are immediately lower than the numerical reference in MC. These findings suggest the existence of multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitude and provides an explanation of the functional dissociation between MC and PJ tasks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1031-1043
Number of pages13
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume237
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 8 2019

Fingerprint

Parity
Habits
Reading
Healthy Volunteers
Brain

Keywords

  • Distance effect
  • SNARC effect
  • Spatial codes
  • Spatial neglect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect. / van Dijck, Jean Philippe; Doricchi, Fabrizio.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 237, No. 4, 08.04.2019, p. 1031-1043.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{61dbd50d1b9e49609860500fc31065c7,
title = "Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect",
abstract = "The SNARC effect reflects the observation that when healthy observers with left-to-right reading habits are asked to compare the magnitude or to judge the parity of numbers, they provide faster reaction times (RT) to small numbers with left-sided responses and faster RTs to large numbers with right-sided responses. In magnitude comparison (MC), right brain damaged patients with left-sided neglect typically show a pathologically enlarged SNARC for large numbers and selective slowing to numbers that are immediately lower than the numerical reference (e.g. 4 for reference 5). This asymmetry has been taken as evidence that small numbers are mentally positioned to the left of the reference and, therefore, are processed less efficiently by patients neglecting the left side of space. In parity judgement (PJ), on the other hand, the size of the SNARC effect is unaffected by neglect. This dissociation is typically attributed to the disturbed explicit processing of number magnitude in MC and preserved implicit processing of magnitude in PJ. Before accepting this interpretation, however, it remains to be investigated whether neglect patients show the same RT pattern that characterizes the performance of healthy participants (i.e. left-side RTs that increase linearly as a function of number magnitude and right-side RTs that decrease linearly as a function of magnitude). Clarifying this point is crucial, because an equally sized SNARC can originate from different RT patterns. Here we demonstrate that the RT pattern of neglect patients during PJ is entirely comparable to those of patients without neglect and healthy controls, while the same neglect patients show selective slowing to numbers that are immediately lower than the numerical reference in MC. These findings suggest the existence of multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitude and provides an explanation of the functional dissociation between MC and PJ tasks.",
keywords = "Distance effect, SNARC effect, Spatial codes, Spatial neglect",
author = "{van Dijck}, {Jean Philippe} and Fabrizio Doricchi",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-019-05483-5",
language = "English",
volume = "237",
pages = "1031--1043",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect

AU - van Dijck, Jean Philippe

AU - Doricchi, Fabrizio

PY - 2019/4/8

Y1 - 2019/4/8

N2 - The SNARC effect reflects the observation that when healthy observers with left-to-right reading habits are asked to compare the magnitude or to judge the parity of numbers, they provide faster reaction times (RT) to small numbers with left-sided responses and faster RTs to large numbers with right-sided responses. In magnitude comparison (MC), right brain damaged patients with left-sided neglect typically show a pathologically enlarged SNARC for large numbers and selective slowing to numbers that are immediately lower than the numerical reference (e.g. 4 for reference 5). This asymmetry has been taken as evidence that small numbers are mentally positioned to the left of the reference and, therefore, are processed less efficiently by patients neglecting the left side of space. In parity judgement (PJ), on the other hand, the size of the SNARC effect is unaffected by neglect. This dissociation is typically attributed to the disturbed explicit processing of number magnitude in MC and preserved implicit processing of magnitude in PJ. Before accepting this interpretation, however, it remains to be investigated whether neglect patients show the same RT pattern that characterizes the performance of healthy participants (i.e. left-side RTs that increase linearly as a function of number magnitude and right-side RTs that decrease linearly as a function of magnitude). Clarifying this point is crucial, because an equally sized SNARC can originate from different RT patterns. Here we demonstrate that the RT pattern of neglect patients during PJ is entirely comparable to those of patients without neglect and healthy controls, while the same neglect patients show selective slowing to numbers that are immediately lower than the numerical reference in MC. These findings suggest the existence of multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitude and provides an explanation of the functional dissociation between MC and PJ tasks.

AB - The SNARC effect reflects the observation that when healthy observers with left-to-right reading habits are asked to compare the magnitude or to judge the parity of numbers, they provide faster reaction times (RT) to small numbers with left-sided responses and faster RTs to large numbers with right-sided responses. In magnitude comparison (MC), right brain damaged patients with left-sided neglect typically show a pathologically enlarged SNARC for large numbers and selective slowing to numbers that are immediately lower than the numerical reference (e.g. 4 for reference 5). This asymmetry has been taken as evidence that small numbers are mentally positioned to the left of the reference and, therefore, are processed less efficiently by patients neglecting the left side of space. In parity judgement (PJ), on the other hand, the size of the SNARC effect is unaffected by neglect. This dissociation is typically attributed to the disturbed explicit processing of number magnitude in MC and preserved implicit processing of magnitude in PJ. Before accepting this interpretation, however, it remains to be investigated whether neglect patients show the same RT pattern that characterizes the performance of healthy participants (i.e. left-side RTs that increase linearly as a function of number magnitude and right-side RTs that decrease linearly as a function of magnitude). Clarifying this point is crucial, because an equally sized SNARC can originate from different RT patterns. Here we demonstrate that the RT pattern of neglect patients during PJ is entirely comparable to those of patients without neglect and healthy controls, while the same neglect patients show selective slowing to numbers that are immediately lower than the numerical reference in MC. These findings suggest the existence of multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitude and provides an explanation of the functional dissociation between MC and PJ tasks.

KW - Distance effect

KW - SNARC effect

KW - Spatial codes

KW - Spatial neglect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061307629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061307629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-019-05483-5

DO - 10.1007/s00221-019-05483-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 30739136

AN - SCOPUS:85061307629

VL - 237

SP - 1031

EP - 1043

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 4

ER -