“My friend, the pain”: Does altered body awareness affect the valence of pain descriptors?

G. Galli, B. Lenggenhager, G. Scivoletto, A. M. Giannini, M. Pazzaglia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Pain is a marker of bodily status, that despite being aversive under most conditions, may also be perceived as a positive experience. However, how bodily states represent, define, and interpret pain signals, and how these processes might be reflected in common language, remains unclear. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to explore the relationship between bodily awareness, pain reactions, and descriptions. A list of pain-related terms was generated from open-ended interviews with persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), and 138 participants (persons with SCI, health professionals, and a healthy control group) rated each descriptor as representative of pain on a gradated scale. A lexical decision task was used to test the strength of the automatic association of the word “pain” with positive and negative concepts. The behavioral results were related to body awareness, experience of pain, and exposure to pain, by comparing the three groups. Results: Higher positive and lower negative pain descriptors, as well as slower response times when categorizing pain as an unpleasant experience were found in the SCI group. The effect was not modulated by either the time since the injury or the present pain intensity, but it was linked to the level of subjective bodily awareness. Compared with the SCI group, health experts and non-experts both associated more quickly the word “pain” and unpleasant in the lexical decision task. However, while health professionals attributed positive linguistic qualities to pain, pain was exclusively associated with negative descriptors in healthy controls group. Conclusions: These findings are discussed in terms of their theoretical and clinical implications. An awareness of bodily signals prominently affects both the sensory and linguistic responses in persons with SCI. Pain should be evaluated more broadly to understand and, by extension, to manage, experiences beyond its adverse side.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1721-1732
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Pain Research
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Pain
Spinal Cord Injuries
Linguistics
Health
Control Groups
Reaction Time
Language
Interviews
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Lexical pain descriptors
  • Positive representations of pain
  • Spinal cord injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

“My friend, the pain” : Does altered body awareness affect the valence of pain descriptors? / Galli, G.; Lenggenhager, B.; Scivoletto, G.; Giannini, A. M.; Pazzaglia, M.

In: Journal of Pain Research, Vol. 12, 01.01.2019, p. 1721-1732.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{604dbcde38604628a43bc53905ca647d,
title = "“My friend, the pain”: Does altered body awareness affect the valence of pain descriptors?",
abstract = "Background: Pain is a marker of bodily status, that despite being aversive under most conditions, may also be perceived as a positive experience. However, how bodily states represent, define, and interpret pain signals, and how these processes might be reflected in common language, remains unclear. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to explore the relationship between bodily awareness, pain reactions, and descriptions. A list of pain-related terms was generated from open-ended interviews with persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), and 138 participants (persons with SCI, health professionals, and a healthy control group) rated each descriptor as representative of pain on a gradated scale. A lexical decision task was used to test the strength of the automatic association of the word “pain” with positive and negative concepts. The behavioral results were related to body awareness, experience of pain, and exposure to pain, by comparing the three groups. Results: Higher positive and lower negative pain descriptors, as well as slower response times when categorizing pain as an unpleasant experience were found in the SCI group. The effect was not modulated by either the time since the injury or the present pain intensity, but it was linked to the level of subjective bodily awareness. Compared with the SCI group, health experts and non-experts both associated more quickly the word “pain” and unpleasant in the lexical decision task. However, while health professionals attributed positive linguistic qualities to pain, pain was exclusively associated with negative descriptors in healthy controls group. Conclusions: These findings are discussed in terms of their theoretical and clinical implications. An awareness of bodily signals prominently affects both the sensory and linguistic responses in persons with SCI. Pain should be evaluated more broadly to understand and, by extension, to manage, experiences beyond its adverse side.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, Lexical pain descriptors, Positive representations of pain, Spinal cord injury",
author = "G. Galli and B. Lenggenhager and G. Scivoletto and Giannini, {A. M.} and M. Pazzaglia",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2147/JPR.S191548",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1721--1732",
journal = "Journal of Pain Research",
issn = "1178-7090",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “My friend, the pain”

T2 - Does altered body awareness affect the valence of pain descriptors?

AU - Galli, G.

AU - Lenggenhager, B.

AU - Scivoletto, G.

AU - Giannini, A. M.

AU - Pazzaglia, M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Pain is a marker of bodily status, that despite being aversive under most conditions, may also be perceived as a positive experience. However, how bodily states represent, define, and interpret pain signals, and how these processes might be reflected in common language, remains unclear. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to explore the relationship between bodily awareness, pain reactions, and descriptions. A list of pain-related terms was generated from open-ended interviews with persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), and 138 participants (persons with SCI, health professionals, and a healthy control group) rated each descriptor as representative of pain on a gradated scale. A lexical decision task was used to test the strength of the automatic association of the word “pain” with positive and negative concepts. The behavioral results were related to body awareness, experience of pain, and exposure to pain, by comparing the three groups. Results: Higher positive and lower negative pain descriptors, as well as slower response times when categorizing pain as an unpleasant experience were found in the SCI group. The effect was not modulated by either the time since the injury or the present pain intensity, but it was linked to the level of subjective bodily awareness. Compared with the SCI group, health experts and non-experts both associated more quickly the word “pain” and unpleasant in the lexical decision task. However, while health professionals attributed positive linguistic qualities to pain, pain was exclusively associated with negative descriptors in healthy controls group. Conclusions: These findings are discussed in terms of their theoretical and clinical implications. An awareness of bodily signals prominently affects both the sensory and linguistic responses in persons with SCI. Pain should be evaluated more broadly to understand and, by extension, to manage, experiences beyond its adverse side.

AB - Background: Pain is a marker of bodily status, that despite being aversive under most conditions, may also be perceived as a positive experience. However, how bodily states represent, define, and interpret pain signals, and how these processes might be reflected in common language, remains unclear. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to explore the relationship between bodily awareness, pain reactions, and descriptions. A list of pain-related terms was generated from open-ended interviews with persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), and 138 participants (persons with SCI, health professionals, and a healthy control group) rated each descriptor as representative of pain on a gradated scale. A lexical decision task was used to test the strength of the automatic association of the word “pain” with positive and negative concepts. The behavioral results were related to body awareness, experience of pain, and exposure to pain, by comparing the three groups. Results: Higher positive and lower negative pain descriptors, as well as slower response times when categorizing pain as an unpleasant experience were found in the SCI group. The effect was not modulated by either the time since the injury or the present pain intensity, but it was linked to the level of subjective bodily awareness. Compared with the SCI group, health experts and non-experts both associated more quickly the word “pain” and unpleasant in the lexical decision task. However, while health professionals attributed positive linguistic qualities to pain, pain was exclusively associated with negative descriptors in healthy controls group. Conclusions: These findings are discussed in terms of their theoretical and clinical implications. An awareness of bodily signals prominently affects both the sensory and linguistic responses in persons with SCI. Pain should be evaluated more broadly to understand and, by extension, to manage, experiences beyond its adverse side.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Lexical pain descriptors

KW - Positive representations of pain

KW - Spinal cord injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066751237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066751237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/JPR.S191548

DO - 10.2147/JPR.S191548

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85066751237

VL - 12

SP - 1721

EP - 1732

JO - Journal of Pain Research

JF - Journal of Pain Research

SN - 1178-7090

ER -