Natural tooth preservation versus extraction and implant placement: Patient preferences and analysis of the willingness to pay

D. Re, C. Ceci, F. Cerutti, M. Del Fabbro, S. Corbella, S. Taschieri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the patients' willingness to pay (WTP) values and preference for the treatment of a tooth with very poor prognosis, among two options: Root canal therapy and crown positioning or tooth extraction, implant insertion and crown positioning.Methods A total of 103 patients were recruited from a private dental clinic and interviewed. A questionnaire measured individuals' preferences among the two alternative treatments for a tooth with poor prognosis and the maximum amount of money they would be willing to pay for their choice with a starting bid of [euro]2,000 in [euro]100 increment/decrement. Demographic data, patient choice, median values and WTP association with socio-demographic factors (Student ttest and one-way ANOVA) and correlation between variables (Pearson chi-square test) were revealed.Results Seventy-six percent of patients expressed a preference for root canal therapy, while the remaining 24% chose the dental surgery. A fair agreement between previous experience and current therapeutic choice was found (P = 0.0001). The WTP median value was [euro]2,000 and 46% of participants would pay an additional sum of money for the therapy (median: [euro]300). The preferred treatment was influenced by previous experience, but no association was found between WTP values and socio-demographic factors.Conclusion Patients tend to prefer a conservative approach for the treatment of a tooth with poor prognosis and are willing to pay an additional fee to receive their treatment choice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-471
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Dental Journal
Volume222
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 24 2017

Fingerprint

Patient Preference
Tooth
Root Canal Therapy
Demography
Crowns
Therapeutics
Dental Clinics
Tooth Extraction
Fees and Charges
Chi-Square Distribution
Analysis of Variance
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Natural tooth preservation versus extraction and implant placement : Patient preferences and analysis of the willingness to pay. / Re, D.; Ceci, C.; Cerutti, F.; Del Fabbro, M.; Corbella, S.; Taschieri, S.

In: British Dental Journal, Vol. 222, No. 6, 24.03.2017, p. 467-471.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eb100e110cbf4c04b545445cf8424c17,
title = "Natural tooth preservation versus extraction and implant placement: Patient preferences and analysis of the willingness to pay",
abstract = "Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the patients' willingness to pay (WTP) values and preference for the treatment of a tooth with very poor prognosis, among two options: Root canal therapy and crown positioning or tooth extraction, implant insertion and crown positioning.Methods A total of 103 patients were recruited from a private dental clinic and interviewed. A questionnaire measured individuals' preferences among the two alternative treatments for a tooth with poor prognosis and the maximum amount of money they would be willing to pay for their choice with a starting bid of [euro]2,000 in [euro]100 increment/decrement. Demographic data, patient choice, median values and WTP association with socio-demographic factors (Student ttest and one-way ANOVA) and correlation between variables (Pearson chi-square test) were revealed.Results Seventy-six percent of patients expressed a preference for root canal therapy, while the remaining 24{\%} chose the dental surgery. A fair agreement between previous experience and current therapeutic choice was found (P = 0.0001). The WTP median value was [euro]2,000 and 46{\%} of participants would pay an additional sum of money for the therapy (median: [euro]300). The preferred treatment was influenced by previous experience, but no association was found between WTP values and socio-demographic factors.Conclusion Patients tend to prefer a conservative approach for the treatment of a tooth with poor prognosis and are willing to pay an additional fee to receive their treatment choice.",
author = "D. Re and C. Ceci and F. Cerutti and {Del Fabbro}, M. and S. Corbella and S. Taschieri",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.271",
language = "English",
volume = "222",
pages = "467--471",
journal = "British Dental Journal",
issn = "0007-0610",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Natural tooth preservation versus extraction and implant placement

T2 - Patient preferences and analysis of the willingness to pay

AU - Re, D.

AU - Ceci, C.

AU - Cerutti, F.

AU - Del Fabbro, M.

AU - Corbella, S.

AU - Taschieri, S.

PY - 2017/3/24

Y1 - 2017/3/24

N2 - Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the patients' willingness to pay (WTP) values and preference for the treatment of a tooth with very poor prognosis, among two options: Root canal therapy and crown positioning or tooth extraction, implant insertion and crown positioning.Methods A total of 103 patients were recruited from a private dental clinic and interviewed. A questionnaire measured individuals' preferences among the two alternative treatments for a tooth with poor prognosis and the maximum amount of money they would be willing to pay for their choice with a starting bid of [euro]2,000 in [euro]100 increment/decrement. Demographic data, patient choice, median values and WTP association with socio-demographic factors (Student ttest and one-way ANOVA) and correlation between variables (Pearson chi-square test) were revealed.Results Seventy-six percent of patients expressed a preference for root canal therapy, while the remaining 24% chose the dental surgery. A fair agreement between previous experience and current therapeutic choice was found (P = 0.0001). The WTP median value was [euro]2,000 and 46% of participants would pay an additional sum of money for the therapy (median: [euro]300). The preferred treatment was influenced by previous experience, but no association was found between WTP values and socio-demographic factors.Conclusion Patients tend to prefer a conservative approach for the treatment of a tooth with poor prognosis and are willing to pay an additional fee to receive their treatment choice.

AB - Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the patients' willingness to pay (WTP) values and preference for the treatment of a tooth with very poor prognosis, among two options: Root canal therapy and crown positioning or tooth extraction, implant insertion and crown positioning.Methods A total of 103 patients were recruited from a private dental clinic and interviewed. A questionnaire measured individuals' preferences among the two alternative treatments for a tooth with poor prognosis and the maximum amount of money they would be willing to pay for their choice with a starting bid of [euro]2,000 in [euro]100 increment/decrement. Demographic data, patient choice, median values and WTP association with socio-demographic factors (Student ttest and one-way ANOVA) and correlation between variables (Pearson chi-square test) were revealed.Results Seventy-six percent of patients expressed a preference for root canal therapy, while the remaining 24% chose the dental surgery. A fair agreement between previous experience and current therapeutic choice was found (P = 0.0001). The WTP median value was [euro]2,000 and 46% of participants would pay an additional sum of money for the therapy (median: [euro]300). The preferred treatment was influenced by previous experience, but no association was found between WTP values and socio-demographic factors.Conclusion Patients tend to prefer a conservative approach for the treatment of a tooth with poor prognosis and are willing to pay an additional fee to receive their treatment choice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016173523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016173523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.271

DO - 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.271

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016173523

VL - 222

SP - 467

EP - 471

JO - British Dental Journal

JF - British Dental Journal

SN - 0007-0610

IS - 6

ER -