Negative impact and positive value in caregiving: Validation of the COPE index in a six-country sample of carers

Cristian Balducci, Eva Mnich, Kevin J. McKee, Giovanni Lamura, Anke Beckmann, Barbro Krevers, Z. Beata Wojszel, Mike Nolan, Constantinos Prouskas, Barbara Bień, Birgitta Öberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The present study attempts to further validate the COPE Index on a large sample of carers drawn from six European countries. Design and Methods: We used a cross-sectional survey, with approximately 1,000 carers recruited in each of six countries by means of a common standard evaluation protocol. Our saturation recruitment of a designated quota of carers occurred by means of several channels, in identified geographical zones within countries. Interviews were carried out with primary informal carers by use of a common assessment tool. We subjected items of the COPE Index to principal component analysis and we assessed emergent components through the use of Cronbach's alpha reliability procedures. We examined factor components as summative scales for confirmatory correlations with caregiving and psychological variables. Results: Three components emerged, which we identified as the negative impact of caregiving, the positive value of caregiving, and the quality of support for caregiving. Internal consistency was good for negative impact and satisfactory for positive value and quality of support. Negative value was most consistently and strongly correlated with caregiving and psychological variables, although we did find diverse associations between these variables and the COPE Index subscales. Implications: The COPE Index is a brief, first-stage assessment of some sophistication that can enable health and social care professionals to develop appropriately targeted interventions to enhance the positive aspects of the caregiving experience and quality of support, as well as reduce the negative impacts of caregiving.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276-286
Number of pages11
JournalGerontologist
Volume48
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Psychology
Principal Component Analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care
N-succinyl-1,2-dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Burden
  • Caregiving
  • Intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ageing

Cite this

Balducci, C., Mnich, E., McKee, K. J., Lamura, G., Beckmann, A., Krevers, B., ... Öberg, B. (2008). Negative impact and positive value in caregiving: Validation of the COPE index in a six-country sample of carers. Gerontologist, 48(3), 276-286.

Negative impact and positive value in caregiving : Validation of the COPE index in a six-country sample of carers. / Balducci, Cristian; Mnich, Eva; McKee, Kevin J.; Lamura, Giovanni; Beckmann, Anke; Krevers, Barbro; Wojszel, Z. Beata; Nolan, Mike; Prouskas, Constantinos; Bień, Barbara; Öberg, Birgitta.

In: Gerontologist, Vol. 48, No. 3, 06.2008, p. 276-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Balducci, C, Mnich, E, McKee, KJ, Lamura, G, Beckmann, A, Krevers, B, Wojszel, ZB, Nolan, M, Prouskas, C, Bień, B & Öberg, B 2008, 'Negative impact and positive value in caregiving: Validation of the COPE index in a six-country sample of carers', Gerontologist, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 276-286.
Balducci, Cristian ; Mnich, Eva ; McKee, Kevin J. ; Lamura, Giovanni ; Beckmann, Anke ; Krevers, Barbro ; Wojszel, Z. Beata ; Nolan, Mike ; Prouskas, Constantinos ; Bień, Barbara ; Öberg, Birgitta. / Negative impact and positive value in caregiving : Validation of the COPE index in a six-country sample of carers. In: Gerontologist. 2008 ; Vol. 48, No. 3. pp. 276-286.
@article{3feb92f1306a42138783787b589ac45a,
title = "Negative impact and positive value in caregiving: Validation of the COPE index in a six-country sample of carers",
abstract = "Purpose: The present study attempts to further validate the COPE Index on a large sample of carers drawn from six European countries. Design and Methods: We used a cross-sectional survey, with approximately 1,000 carers recruited in each of six countries by means of a common standard evaluation protocol. Our saturation recruitment of a designated quota of carers occurred by means of several channels, in identified geographical zones within countries. Interviews were carried out with primary informal carers by use of a common assessment tool. We subjected items of the COPE Index to principal component analysis and we assessed emergent components through the use of Cronbach's alpha reliability procedures. We examined factor components as summative scales for confirmatory correlations with caregiving and psychological variables. Results: Three components emerged, which we identified as the negative impact of caregiving, the positive value of caregiving, and the quality of support for caregiving. Internal consistency was good for negative impact and satisfactory for positive value and quality of support. Negative value was most consistently and strongly correlated with caregiving and psychological variables, although we did find diverse associations between these variables and the COPE Index subscales. Implications: The COPE Index is a brief, first-stage assessment of some sophistication that can enable health and social care professionals to develop appropriately targeted interventions to enhance the positive aspects of the caregiving experience and quality of support, as well as reduce the negative impacts of caregiving.",
keywords = "Assessment, Burden, Caregiving, Intervention",
author = "Cristian Balducci and Eva Mnich and McKee, {Kevin J.} and Giovanni Lamura and Anke Beckmann and Barbro Krevers and Wojszel, {Z. Beata} and Mike Nolan and Constantinos Prouskas and Barbara Bień and Birgitta {\"O}berg",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "276--286",
journal = "The Gerontologist",
issn = "0016-9013",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negative impact and positive value in caregiving

T2 - Validation of the COPE index in a six-country sample of carers

AU - Balducci, Cristian

AU - Mnich, Eva

AU - McKee, Kevin J.

AU - Lamura, Giovanni

AU - Beckmann, Anke

AU - Krevers, Barbro

AU - Wojszel, Z. Beata

AU - Nolan, Mike

AU - Prouskas, Constantinos

AU - Bień, Barbara

AU - Öberg, Birgitta

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Purpose: The present study attempts to further validate the COPE Index on a large sample of carers drawn from six European countries. Design and Methods: We used a cross-sectional survey, with approximately 1,000 carers recruited in each of six countries by means of a common standard evaluation protocol. Our saturation recruitment of a designated quota of carers occurred by means of several channels, in identified geographical zones within countries. Interviews were carried out with primary informal carers by use of a common assessment tool. We subjected items of the COPE Index to principal component analysis and we assessed emergent components through the use of Cronbach's alpha reliability procedures. We examined factor components as summative scales for confirmatory correlations with caregiving and psychological variables. Results: Three components emerged, which we identified as the negative impact of caregiving, the positive value of caregiving, and the quality of support for caregiving. Internal consistency was good for negative impact and satisfactory for positive value and quality of support. Negative value was most consistently and strongly correlated with caregiving and psychological variables, although we did find diverse associations between these variables and the COPE Index subscales. Implications: The COPE Index is a brief, first-stage assessment of some sophistication that can enable health and social care professionals to develop appropriately targeted interventions to enhance the positive aspects of the caregiving experience and quality of support, as well as reduce the negative impacts of caregiving.

AB - Purpose: The present study attempts to further validate the COPE Index on a large sample of carers drawn from six European countries. Design and Methods: We used a cross-sectional survey, with approximately 1,000 carers recruited in each of six countries by means of a common standard evaluation protocol. Our saturation recruitment of a designated quota of carers occurred by means of several channels, in identified geographical zones within countries. Interviews were carried out with primary informal carers by use of a common assessment tool. We subjected items of the COPE Index to principal component analysis and we assessed emergent components through the use of Cronbach's alpha reliability procedures. We examined factor components as summative scales for confirmatory correlations with caregiving and psychological variables. Results: Three components emerged, which we identified as the negative impact of caregiving, the positive value of caregiving, and the quality of support for caregiving. Internal consistency was good for negative impact and satisfactory for positive value and quality of support. Negative value was most consistently and strongly correlated with caregiving and psychological variables, although we did find diverse associations between these variables and the COPE Index subscales. Implications: The COPE Index is a brief, first-stage assessment of some sophistication that can enable health and social care professionals to develop appropriately targeted interventions to enhance the positive aspects of the caregiving experience and quality of support, as well as reduce the negative impacts of caregiving.

KW - Assessment

KW - Burden

KW - Caregiving

KW - Intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40849094297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40849094297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18591353

AN - SCOPUS:40849094297

VL - 48

SP - 276

EP - 286

JO - The Gerontologist

JF - The Gerontologist

SN - 0016-9013

IS - 3

ER -