Neglect dyslexia: A matter of "good looking"

Silvia Primativo, Lisa S. Arduino, Maria De Luca, Roberta Daini, Marialuisa Martelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Brain-damaged patients with right-sided unilateral spatial neglect (USN) often make left-sided errors in reading single words or pseudowords (neglect dyslexia, ND). We propose that both left neglect and low fixation accuracy account for reading errors in neglect dyslexia.Eye movements were recorded in USN patients with (ND+) and without (ND-) neglect dyslexia and in a matched control group of right brain-damaged patients without neglect (USN-). Unlike ND- and controls, ND+ patients showed left lateralized omission errors and a distorted eye movement pattern in both a reading aloud task and a non-verbal saccadic task. During reading, the total number of fixations was larger in these patients independent of visual hemispace, and most fixations were inaccurate. Similarly, in the saccadic task only ND+ patients were unable to reach the moving dot. A third experiment addressed the nature of the left lateralization in reading error distribution by simulating neglect dyslexia in ND- patients. ND- and USN- patients had to perform a speeded reading-at-threshold task that did not allow for eye movements. When stimulus exploration was prevented, ND- patients, but not controls, produced a pattern of errors similar to that of ND+ with unlimited exposure time (e.g., left-sided errors).We conclude that neglect dyslexia reading errors may arise in USN patients as a consequence of an additional and independent deficit unrelated to the orthographic material. In particular, the presence of an altered oculo-motor pattern, preventing the automatic execution of the fine saccadic eye movements involved in reading, uncovers, in USN patients, the attentional bias also in reading single centrally presented words.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2109-2119
Number of pages11
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume51
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Dyslexia
Reading
Eye Movements
Neglect
Saccades
Brain
Patient Rights

Keywords

  • Eye movements
  • Neglect
  • Neglect dyslexia
  • Reading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Neglect dyslexia : A matter of "good looking". / Primativo, Silvia; Arduino, Lisa S.; De Luca, Maria; Daini, Roberta; Martelli, Marialuisa.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 51, No. 11, 2013, p. 2109-2119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Primativo, Silvia ; Arduino, Lisa S. ; De Luca, Maria ; Daini, Roberta ; Martelli, Marialuisa. / Neglect dyslexia : A matter of "good looking". In: Neuropsychologia. 2013 ; Vol. 51, No. 11. pp. 2109-2119.
@article{5ff47757ac634c9094757b204107ca0d,
title = "Neglect dyslexia: A matter of {"}good looking{"}",
abstract = "Brain-damaged patients with right-sided unilateral spatial neglect (USN) often make left-sided errors in reading single words or pseudowords (neglect dyslexia, ND). We propose that both left neglect and low fixation accuracy account for reading errors in neglect dyslexia.Eye movements were recorded in USN patients with (ND+) and without (ND-) neglect dyslexia and in a matched control group of right brain-damaged patients without neglect (USN-). Unlike ND- and controls, ND+ patients showed left lateralized omission errors and a distorted eye movement pattern in both a reading aloud task and a non-verbal saccadic task. During reading, the total number of fixations was larger in these patients independent of visual hemispace, and most fixations were inaccurate. Similarly, in the saccadic task only ND+ patients were unable to reach the moving dot. A third experiment addressed the nature of the left lateralization in reading error distribution by simulating neglect dyslexia in ND- patients. ND- and USN- patients had to perform a speeded reading-at-threshold task that did not allow for eye movements. When stimulus exploration was prevented, ND- patients, but not controls, produced a pattern of errors similar to that of ND+ with unlimited exposure time (e.g., left-sided errors).We conclude that neglect dyslexia reading errors may arise in USN patients as a consequence of an additional and independent deficit unrelated to the orthographic material. In particular, the presence of an altered oculo-motor pattern, preventing the automatic execution of the fine saccadic eye movements involved in reading, uncovers, in USN patients, the attentional bias also in reading single centrally presented words.",
keywords = "Eye movements, Neglect, Neglect dyslexia, Reading",
author = "Silvia Primativo and Arduino, {Lisa S.} and {De Luca}, Maria and Roberta Daini and Marialuisa Martelli",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.002",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "2109--2119",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neglect dyslexia

T2 - A matter of "good looking"

AU - Primativo, Silvia

AU - Arduino, Lisa S.

AU - De Luca, Maria

AU - Daini, Roberta

AU - Martelli, Marialuisa

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Brain-damaged patients with right-sided unilateral spatial neglect (USN) often make left-sided errors in reading single words or pseudowords (neglect dyslexia, ND). We propose that both left neglect and low fixation accuracy account for reading errors in neglect dyslexia.Eye movements were recorded in USN patients with (ND+) and without (ND-) neglect dyslexia and in a matched control group of right brain-damaged patients without neglect (USN-). Unlike ND- and controls, ND+ patients showed left lateralized omission errors and a distorted eye movement pattern in both a reading aloud task and a non-verbal saccadic task. During reading, the total number of fixations was larger in these patients independent of visual hemispace, and most fixations were inaccurate. Similarly, in the saccadic task only ND+ patients were unable to reach the moving dot. A third experiment addressed the nature of the left lateralization in reading error distribution by simulating neglect dyslexia in ND- patients. ND- and USN- patients had to perform a speeded reading-at-threshold task that did not allow for eye movements. When stimulus exploration was prevented, ND- patients, but not controls, produced a pattern of errors similar to that of ND+ with unlimited exposure time (e.g., left-sided errors).We conclude that neglect dyslexia reading errors may arise in USN patients as a consequence of an additional and independent deficit unrelated to the orthographic material. In particular, the presence of an altered oculo-motor pattern, preventing the automatic execution of the fine saccadic eye movements involved in reading, uncovers, in USN patients, the attentional bias also in reading single centrally presented words.

AB - Brain-damaged patients with right-sided unilateral spatial neglect (USN) often make left-sided errors in reading single words or pseudowords (neglect dyslexia, ND). We propose that both left neglect and low fixation accuracy account for reading errors in neglect dyslexia.Eye movements were recorded in USN patients with (ND+) and without (ND-) neglect dyslexia and in a matched control group of right brain-damaged patients without neglect (USN-). Unlike ND- and controls, ND+ patients showed left lateralized omission errors and a distorted eye movement pattern in both a reading aloud task and a non-verbal saccadic task. During reading, the total number of fixations was larger in these patients independent of visual hemispace, and most fixations were inaccurate. Similarly, in the saccadic task only ND+ patients were unable to reach the moving dot. A third experiment addressed the nature of the left lateralization in reading error distribution by simulating neglect dyslexia in ND- patients. ND- and USN- patients had to perform a speeded reading-at-threshold task that did not allow for eye movements. When stimulus exploration was prevented, ND- patients, but not controls, produced a pattern of errors similar to that of ND+ with unlimited exposure time (e.g., left-sided errors).We conclude that neglect dyslexia reading errors may arise in USN patients as a consequence of an additional and independent deficit unrelated to the orthographic material. In particular, the presence of an altered oculo-motor pattern, preventing the automatic execution of the fine saccadic eye movements involved in reading, uncovers, in USN patients, the attentional bias also in reading single centrally presented words.

KW - Eye movements

KW - Neglect

KW - Neglect dyslexia

KW - Reading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882744704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882744704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 23850599

AN - SCOPUS:84882744704

VL - 51

SP - 2109

EP - 2119

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

IS - 11

ER -