Neuroendocrine Carcinomas with Atypical Proliferation Index and Clinical Behavior: A Systematic Review

Tiziana Feola, Roberta Centello, Franz Sesti, Giulia Puliani, Monica Verrico, Valentina Di Vito, Cira Di Gioia, Oreste Bagni, Andrea Lenzi, Andrea M Isidori, Elisa Giannetta, Antongiulio Faggiano

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Highly proliferative (G3) neuroendocrine neoplasms are divided into well differentiated tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated carcinomas (NECs), based on the morphological appearance. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinicopathological features and the treatment response of the NEC subgroup with a Ki67 labeling index (LI) < 55%.

METHODS: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus between December 2019 and April 2020, last update in October 2020. We included studies reporting data on the clinicopathological characteristics, survival, and/or therapy efficacy of patients with NECs, in which the Ki67 LI was specified.

RESULTS: 8 papers were included, on a total of 268 NEC affected patients. NECs with a Ki67 LI < 55% have been reported in patients of both sexes, mainly of sixth decade, pancreatic origin, and large-cell morphology. The prevalent treatment choice was chemotherapy, followed by surgery and, in only one study, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. The subgroup of patients with NEC with a Ki67 LI < 55% showed longer overall survival and progression free survival and higher response rates than the subgroup of patients with a tumor with higher Ki67 LI (≥55%).

CONCLUSIONS: NECs are heterogeneous tumors. The subgroup with a Ki67 LI < 55% has a better prognosis and should be treated and monitored differently from NECs with a Ki67 LI ≥ 55%.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCancers
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 12 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neuroendocrine Carcinomas with Atypical Proliferation Index and Clinical Behavior: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this