Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients

Nadia Bolognini, Giuseppe Vallar, Carlotta Casati, Lydia Abdul Latif, Rasheda El-Nazer, Julie Williams, Elisabetta Banco, Debora Duarte MacEa, Luigi Tesio, Cecilia Chessa, Felipe Fregni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

170 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Recovery of motor function after stroke may depend on a balance of activity in the neural network involving the affected and the unaffected motor cortices. Objective. To assess whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can increase the training-induced recovery of motor functions. Methods. In an exploratory study, 14 patients with chronic stroke and mean Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment of 29 (range = 8-50) entered a double-blind sham-controlled study, aimed to investigate neurophysiological and behavioral effects of bihemispheric tDCS (cathodal stimulation of the unaffected motor cortex and anodal stimulation of the affected motor cortex), combined with constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). Results. Patients in both groups demonstrated gains on primary outcome measures, that is, Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test, Handgrip Strength, Motor Activity Log Scale, and Fugl-Meyer Motor Score. Gains were larger in the active tDCS group. Neurophysiological measurements showed a reduction in transcallosal inhibition from the intact to the affected hemisphere and increased corticospinal excitability in the affected hemisphere only in the active tDCS/CIMT group. Such neurophysiological changes correlated with the magnitude of the behavioral gains. Both groups showed a reduction in corticospinal excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Conclusions. CIMT alone appears effective in modulating local excitability but not in removing the imbalance in transcallosal inhibition. Bihemispheric tDCS may achieve this goal and foster greater functional recovery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)819-829
Number of pages11
JournalNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Motor Cortex
Recovery of Function
Stroke
Therapeutics
Group Psychotherapy
Upper Extremity
Motor Activity
Hand
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Inhibition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • constraint-induced movement therapy
  • motor cortex
  • motor recovery
  • stroke rehabilitation
  • transcranial direct current stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology

Cite this

Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. / Bolognini, Nadia; Vallar, Giuseppe; Casati, Carlotta; Latif, Lydia Abdul; El-Nazer, Rasheda; Williams, Julie; Banco, Elisabetta; MacEa, Debora Duarte; Tesio, Luigi; Chessa, Cecilia; Fregni, Felipe.

In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 25, No. 9, 11.2011, p. 819-829.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1b4d09cf01149b7b828344098632309,
title = "Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients",
abstract = "Background. Recovery of motor function after stroke may depend on a balance of activity in the neural network involving the affected and the unaffected motor cortices. Objective. To assess whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can increase the training-induced recovery of motor functions. Methods. In an exploratory study, 14 patients with chronic stroke and mean Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment of 29 (range = 8-50) entered a double-blind sham-controlled study, aimed to investigate neurophysiological and behavioral effects of bihemispheric tDCS (cathodal stimulation of the unaffected motor cortex and anodal stimulation of the affected motor cortex), combined with constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). Results. Patients in both groups demonstrated gains on primary outcome measures, that is, Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test, Handgrip Strength, Motor Activity Log Scale, and Fugl-Meyer Motor Score. Gains were larger in the active tDCS group. Neurophysiological measurements showed a reduction in transcallosal inhibition from the intact to the affected hemisphere and increased corticospinal excitability in the affected hemisphere only in the active tDCS/CIMT group. Such neurophysiological changes correlated with the magnitude of the behavioral gains. Both groups showed a reduction in corticospinal excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Conclusions. CIMT alone appears effective in modulating local excitability but not in removing the imbalance in transcallosal inhibition. Bihemispheric tDCS may achieve this goal and foster greater functional recovery.",
keywords = "constraint-induced movement therapy, motor cortex, motor recovery, stroke rehabilitation, transcranial direct current stimulation",
author = "Nadia Bolognini and Giuseppe Vallar and Carlotta Casati and Latif, {Lydia Abdul} and Rasheda El-Nazer and Julie Williams and Elisabetta Banco and MacEa, {Debora Duarte} and Luigi Tesio and Cecilia Chessa and Felipe Fregni",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/1545968311411056",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "819--829",
journal = "Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation",
issn = "1545-9683",
publisher = "Sage Science Press",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients

AU - Bolognini, Nadia

AU - Vallar, Giuseppe

AU - Casati, Carlotta

AU - Latif, Lydia Abdul

AU - El-Nazer, Rasheda

AU - Williams, Julie

AU - Banco, Elisabetta

AU - MacEa, Debora Duarte

AU - Tesio, Luigi

AU - Chessa, Cecilia

AU - Fregni, Felipe

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Background. Recovery of motor function after stroke may depend on a balance of activity in the neural network involving the affected and the unaffected motor cortices. Objective. To assess whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can increase the training-induced recovery of motor functions. Methods. In an exploratory study, 14 patients with chronic stroke and mean Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment of 29 (range = 8-50) entered a double-blind sham-controlled study, aimed to investigate neurophysiological and behavioral effects of bihemispheric tDCS (cathodal stimulation of the unaffected motor cortex and anodal stimulation of the affected motor cortex), combined with constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). Results. Patients in both groups demonstrated gains on primary outcome measures, that is, Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test, Handgrip Strength, Motor Activity Log Scale, and Fugl-Meyer Motor Score. Gains were larger in the active tDCS group. Neurophysiological measurements showed a reduction in transcallosal inhibition from the intact to the affected hemisphere and increased corticospinal excitability in the affected hemisphere only in the active tDCS/CIMT group. Such neurophysiological changes correlated with the magnitude of the behavioral gains. Both groups showed a reduction in corticospinal excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Conclusions. CIMT alone appears effective in modulating local excitability but not in removing the imbalance in transcallosal inhibition. Bihemispheric tDCS may achieve this goal and foster greater functional recovery.

AB - Background. Recovery of motor function after stroke may depend on a balance of activity in the neural network involving the affected and the unaffected motor cortices. Objective. To assess whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can increase the training-induced recovery of motor functions. Methods. In an exploratory study, 14 patients with chronic stroke and mean Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment of 29 (range = 8-50) entered a double-blind sham-controlled study, aimed to investigate neurophysiological and behavioral effects of bihemispheric tDCS (cathodal stimulation of the unaffected motor cortex and anodal stimulation of the affected motor cortex), combined with constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). Results. Patients in both groups demonstrated gains on primary outcome measures, that is, Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test, Handgrip Strength, Motor Activity Log Scale, and Fugl-Meyer Motor Score. Gains were larger in the active tDCS group. Neurophysiological measurements showed a reduction in transcallosal inhibition from the intact to the affected hemisphere and increased corticospinal excitability in the affected hemisphere only in the active tDCS/CIMT group. Such neurophysiological changes correlated with the magnitude of the behavioral gains. Both groups showed a reduction in corticospinal excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. Conclusions. CIMT alone appears effective in modulating local excitability but not in removing the imbalance in transcallosal inhibition. Bihemispheric tDCS may achieve this goal and foster greater functional recovery.

KW - constraint-induced movement therapy

KW - motor cortex

KW - motor recovery

KW - stroke rehabilitation

KW - transcranial direct current stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054051053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054051053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1545968311411056

DO - 10.1177/1545968311411056

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 819

EP - 829

JO - Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation

SN - 1545-9683

IS - 9

ER -