Non-invasive diagnosis of pink basal cell carcinoma

How much can we rely on dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy?

A. M. Witkowski, J. Łudzik, N. Decarvalho, S. Ciardo, C. Longo, A. Dinardo, G. Pellacani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Non-pigmented 'pink' cutaneous lesions in differential diagnosis with basal cell carcinoma may present a challenge for clinicians. Our objective was to determine the potential improvement of diagnostic accuracy using combined dermoscopy-reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) image evaluation. Methods: Two hundred and sixty clinically equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions were evaluated retrospectively. Reader accuracy was tested with dermoscopy images only vs. RCM and combined dermoscopy-RCM images. Results: Out of 260 equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions, there were 114 basal cell carcinomas within a total of 140 malignancies that included 12 melanomas, 13 squamous cell carcinomas, and 1 other malignancy type. Dermoscopy only evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 85.1% and specificity of 92.4%, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 89.8%, with 1 of 12 melanomas misdiagnosed. RCM evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 85.1% and specificity of 93.8%, resulting in a PPV of 91.5%, with no melanomas misdiagnosed. Combined dermoscopy-RCM evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 77.2% and specificity of 96.6%, resulting in a PPV of 94.6%. Conclusion: The combination of dermoscopy-RCM evaluation significantly improves the accuracy and safety threshold in equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions in the differential diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)230-7
Number of pages8
JournalSkin Research and Technology
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Dermoscopy
Basal Cell Carcinoma
Confocal Microscopy
Melanoma
Skin
Diagnostic Errors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Differential Diagnosis
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Neoplasms
Safety

Keywords

  • Basal cell carcinoma
  • Dermoscopy
  • Melanoma
  • Reflectance confocal microscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Non-invasive diagnosis of pink basal cell carcinoma : How much can we rely on dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy? / Witkowski, A. M.; Łudzik, J.; Decarvalho, N.; Ciardo, S.; Longo, C.; Dinardo, A.; Pellacani, G.

In: Skin Research and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.05.2016, p. 230-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Witkowski, A. M. ; Łudzik, J. ; Decarvalho, N. ; Ciardo, S. ; Longo, C. ; Dinardo, A. ; Pellacani, G. / Non-invasive diagnosis of pink basal cell carcinoma : How much can we rely on dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy?. In: Skin Research and Technology. 2016 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 230-7.
@article{b7a653d50fe8476b8c6f72ccf9fb8110,
title = "Non-invasive diagnosis of pink basal cell carcinoma: How much can we rely on dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy?",
abstract = "Background: Non-pigmented 'pink' cutaneous lesions in differential diagnosis with basal cell carcinoma may present a challenge for clinicians. Our objective was to determine the potential improvement of diagnostic accuracy using combined dermoscopy-reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) image evaluation. Methods: Two hundred and sixty clinically equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions were evaluated retrospectively. Reader accuracy was tested with dermoscopy images only vs. RCM and combined dermoscopy-RCM images. Results: Out of 260 equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions, there were 114 basal cell carcinomas within a total of 140 malignancies that included 12 melanomas, 13 squamous cell carcinomas, and 1 other malignancy type. Dermoscopy only evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 85.1{\%} and specificity of 92.4{\%}, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 89.8{\%}, with 1 of 12 melanomas misdiagnosed. RCM evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 85.1{\%} and specificity of 93.8{\%}, resulting in a PPV of 91.5{\%}, with no melanomas misdiagnosed. Combined dermoscopy-RCM evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 77.2{\%} and specificity of 96.6{\%}, resulting in a PPV of 94.6{\%}. Conclusion: The combination of dermoscopy-RCM evaluation significantly improves the accuracy and safety threshold in equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions in the differential diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma.",
keywords = "Basal cell carcinoma, Dermoscopy, Melanoma, Reflectance confocal microscopy",
author = "Witkowski, {A. M.} and J. Łudzik and N. Decarvalho and S. Ciardo and C. Longo and A. Dinardo and G. Pellacani",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/srt.12254",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "230--7",
journal = "Skin Research and Technology",
issn = "0909-752X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-invasive diagnosis of pink basal cell carcinoma

T2 - How much can we rely on dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy?

AU - Witkowski, A. M.

AU - Łudzik, J.

AU - Decarvalho, N.

AU - Ciardo, S.

AU - Longo, C.

AU - Dinardo, A.

AU - Pellacani, G.

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Background: Non-pigmented 'pink' cutaneous lesions in differential diagnosis with basal cell carcinoma may present a challenge for clinicians. Our objective was to determine the potential improvement of diagnostic accuracy using combined dermoscopy-reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) image evaluation. Methods: Two hundred and sixty clinically equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions were evaluated retrospectively. Reader accuracy was tested with dermoscopy images only vs. RCM and combined dermoscopy-RCM images. Results: Out of 260 equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions, there were 114 basal cell carcinomas within a total of 140 malignancies that included 12 melanomas, 13 squamous cell carcinomas, and 1 other malignancy type. Dermoscopy only evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 85.1% and specificity of 92.4%, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 89.8%, with 1 of 12 melanomas misdiagnosed. RCM evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 85.1% and specificity of 93.8%, resulting in a PPV of 91.5%, with no melanomas misdiagnosed. Combined dermoscopy-RCM evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 77.2% and specificity of 96.6%, resulting in a PPV of 94.6%. Conclusion: The combination of dermoscopy-RCM evaluation significantly improves the accuracy and safety threshold in equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions in the differential diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma.

AB - Background: Non-pigmented 'pink' cutaneous lesions in differential diagnosis with basal cell carcinoma may present a challenge for clinicians. Our objective was to determine the potential improvement of diagnostic accuracy using combined dermoscopy-reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) image evaluation. Methods: Two hundred and sixty clinically equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions were evaluated retrospectively. Reader accuracy was tested with dermoscopy images only vs. RCM and combined dermoscopy-RCM images. Results: Out of 260 equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions, there were 114 basal cell carcinomas within a total of 140 malignancies that included 12 melanomas, 13 squamous cell carcinomas, and 1 other malignancy type. Dermoscopy only evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 85.1% and specificity of 92.4%, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 89.8%, with 1 of 12 melanomas misdiagnosed. RCM evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 85.1% and specificity of 93.8%, resulting in a PPV of 91.5%, with no melanomas misdiagnosed. Combined dermoscopy-RCM evaluation resulted in an overall sensitivity of 77.2% and specificity of 96.6%, resulting in a PPV of 94.6%. Conclusion: The combination of dermoscopy-RCM evaluation significantly improves the accuracy and safety threshold in equivocal 'pink' cutaneous lesions in the differential diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma.

KW - Basal cell carcinoma

KW - Dermoscopy

KW - Melanoma

KW - Reflectance confocal microscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84950255861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84950255861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/srt.12254

DO - 10.1111/srt.12254

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 230

EP - 237

JO - Skin Research and Technology

JF - Skin Research and Technology

SN - 0909-752X

IS - 2

ER -