TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
T2 - Insights from multimodality imaging and electrocardiography. A brief review
AU - Carità, Patrizia
AU - Corrado, Egle
AU - Pontone, Gianluca
AU - Curnis, Antonio
AU - Bontempi, Luca
AU - Novo, Giuseppina
AU - Guglielmo, Marco
AU - Ciaramitaro, Gianfranco
AU - Assennato, Pasquale
AU - Novo, Salvatore
AU - Coppola, Giuseppe
PY - 2016/12/15
Y1 - 2016/12/15
N2 - Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a successful strategy for heart failure (HF) patients. The pre-requisite for the response is the evidence of electrical dyssynchrony on the surface electrocardiogram usually as left bundle branch block (LBBB). Non-response to CRT is a significant problem in clinical practice. Patient selection, inadequate delivery and sub-optimal left ventricle lead position may be important causes. Objectives In an effort to improve CRT response multimodality imaging (especially echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance) could play a decisive role and extensive literature has been published on the matter. However, we are so far from routinary use in clinical practice. Electrocardiography (with respect to left ventricle capture and QRS narrowing) may represent a simple and low cost approach for early prediction of potential non-responder, with immediate practical implications. Conclusion This brief review covers the current recommendations for CRT in HF patients with particular attention to the potential benefits of multimodality imaging and electrocardiography in improving response rate.
AB - Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a successful strategy for heart failure (HF) patients. The pre-requisite for the response is the evidence of electrical dyssynchrony on the surface electrocardiogram usually as left bundle branch block (LBBB). Non-response to CRT is a significant problem in clinical practice. Patient selection, inadequate delivery and sub-optimal left ventricle lead position may be important causes. Objectives In an effort to improve CRT response multimodality imaging (especially echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance) could play a decisive role and extensive literature has been published on the matter. However, we are so far from routinary use in clinical practice. Electrocardiography (with respect to left ventricle capture and QRS narrowing) may represent a simple and low cost approach for early prediction of potential non-responder, with immediate practical implications. Conclusion This brief review covers the current recommendations for CRT in HF patients with particular attention to the potential benefits of multimodality imaging and electrocardiography in improving response rate.
KW - Cardiac resynchonization therapy
KW - Electrocardiography
KW - Heart failure
KW - Multimodality imaging
KW - Response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992521898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992521898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.037
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.037
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84992521898
VL - 225
SP - 402
EP - 407
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
SN - 0167-5273
ER -