Non-surgical organ preservation strategies for locally advanced laryngeal tumors: what is the Italian attitude? Results of a national survey on behalf of AIRO and AIOM

D. Alterio, P. Franco, G. Numico, L. Licitra, M. Cossu Rocca, Annamaria Ferrari, C. Pinto, E. G. Russi, U. Ricardi, B. A. Jereczek Fossa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chemoradiotherapy is the treatment mostly used as organ preservation (OP) strategy worldwide in advanced laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer. Due to the not homogeneous results of the literature data regarding the pre-treatment assessment and treatment schedule in this setting of patients, the Italian societies of radiation oncology and medical oncology surveyed (by an online survey) their memberships regarding the Italian attitude on larynx preservation in clinical practice. The survey outline addressed different items such as: demographics (11 items), pre-treatment evaluation (12 items), treatment schedules (10 items) and outcomes (3 items). The survey was filled in by 116 clinical oncologists (64 % radiation and 36 % medical oncologists). Results highlighted that pretreatment evaluation was not homogeneous among the respondents. The treatment of choice for the OP program resulted the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (66 %). Induction chemotherapy was proposed mostly in case of aggressive tumors such as advanced stage (T4 or N3) and/or unfavorable primary sites (hypopharynx). Moreover, after induction chemotherapy, for responders patients most participants (46 %) proposed concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while 18 and 19 % proposed radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy and cetuximab, respectively. For patients with stable disease after induction chemotherapy, the respondents declared to suggest surgery, radiotherapy and cetuximab or radiotherapy alone in 38, 32 and 15 % of cases, respectively. Results of the present survey highlighted the variability of therapeutic approaches offered in clinical practice for patients candidate to a larynx OP program. Analysis of abovementioned results may give the chance to modify some clinical attitudes and create the background for future clinical investigation in this field.

Original languageEnglish
Article number76
JournalMedical Oncology
Volume33
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Organ Preservation
Induction Chemotherapy
Chemoradiotherapy
Radiotherapy
Neoplasms
Larynx
Therapeutics
Appointments and Schedules
Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms
Hypopharynx
Radiation Oncology
Medical Oncology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Demography

Keywords

  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Laryngeal tumor
  • Organ preservation
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Hematology

Cite this

@article{53c359e2134e41baa7a5bdf8c1af8848,
title = "Non-surgical organ preservation strategies for locally advanced laryngeal tumors: what is the Italian attitude? Results of a national survey on behalf of AIRO and AIOM",
abstract = "Chemoradiotherapy is the treatment mostly used as organ preservation (OP) strategy worldwide in advanced laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer. Due to the not homogeneous results of the literature data regarding the pre-treatment assessment and treatment schedule in this setting of patients, the Italian societies of radiation oncology and medical oncology surveyed (by an online survey) their memberships regarding the Italian attitude on larynx preservation in clinical practice. The survey outline addressed different items such as: demographics (11 items), pre-treatment evaluation (12 items), treatment schedules (10 items) and outcomes (3 items). The survey was filled in by 116 clinical oncologists (64 {\%} radiation and 36 {\%} medical oncologists). Results highlighted that pretreatment evaluation was not homogeneous among the respondents. The treatment of choice for the OP program resulted the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (66 {\%}). Induction chemotherapy was proposed mostly in case of aggressive tumors such as advanced stage (T4 or N3) and/or unfavorable primary sites (hypopharynx). Moreover, after induction chemotherapy, for responders patients most participants (46 {\%}) proposed concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while 18 and 19 {\%} proposed radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy and cetuximab, respectively. For patients with stable disease after induction chemotherapy, the respondents declared to suggest surgery, radiotherapy and cetuximab or radiotherapy alone in 38, 32 and 15 {\%} of cases, respectively. Results of the present survey highlighted the variability of therapeutic approaches offered in clinical practice for patients candidate to a larynx OP program. Analysis of abovementioned results may give the chance to modify some clinical attitudes and create the background for future clinical investigation in this field.",
keywords = "Chemoradiotherapy, Laryngeal tumor, Organ preservation, Survey",
author = "D. Alterio and P. Franco and G. Numico and L. Licitra and {Cossu Rocca}, M. and Annamaria Ferrari and C. Pinto and Russi, {E. G.} and U. Ricardi and {Jereczek Fossa}, {B. A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12032-016-0781-5",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
journal = "Medical Oncology",
issn = "1357-0560",
publisher = "Humana Press Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-surgical organ preservation strategies for locally advanced laryngeal tumors

T2 - what is the Italian attitude? Results of a national survey on behalf of AIRO and AIOM

AU - Alterio, D.

AU - Franco, P.

AU - Numico, G.

AU - Licitra, L.

AU - Cossu Rocca, M.

AU - Ferrari, Annamaria

AU - Pinto, C.

AU - Russi, E. G.

AU - Ricardi, U.

AU - Jereczek Fossa, B. A.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Chemoradiotherapy is the treatment mostly used as organ preservation (OP) strategy worldwide in advanced laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer. Due to the not homogeneous results of the literature data regarding the pre-treatment assessment and treatment schedule in this setting of patients, the Italian societies of radiation oncology and medical oncology surveyed (by an online survey) their memberships regarding the Italian attitude on larynx preservation in clinical practice. The survey outline addressed different items such as: demographics (11 items), pre-treatment evaluation (12 items), treatment schedules (10 items) and outcomes (3 items). The survey was filled in by 116 clinical oncologists (64 % radiation and 36 % medical oncologists). Results highlighted that pretreatment evaluation was not homogeneous among the respondents. The treatment of choice for the OP program resulted the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (66 %). Induction chemotherapy was proposed mostly in case of aggressive tumors such as advanced stage (T4 or N3) and/or unfavorable primary sites (hypopharynx). Moreover, after induction chemotherapy, for responders patients most participants (46 %) proposed concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while 18 and 19 % proposed radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy and cetuximab, respectively. For patients with stable disease after induction chemotherapy, the respondents declared to suggest surgery, radiotherapy and cetuximab or radiotherapy alone in 38, 32 and 15 % of cases, respectively. Results of the present survey highlighted the variability of therapeutic approaches offered in clinical practice for patients candidate to a larynx OP program. Analysis of abovementioned results may give the chance to modify some clinical attitudes and create the background for future clinical investigation in this field.

AB - Chemoradiotherapy is the treatment mostly used as organ preservation (OP) strategy worldwide in advanced laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer. Due to the not homogeneous results of the literature data regarding the pre-treatment assessment and treatment schedule in this setting of patients, the Italian societies of radiation oncology and medical oncology surveyed (by an online survey) their memberships regarding the Italian attitude on larynx preservation in clinical practice. The survey outline addressed different items such as: demographics (11 items), pre-treatment evaluation (12 items), treatment schedules (10 items) and outcomes (3 items). The survey was filled in by 116 clinical oncologists (64 % radiation and 36 % medical oncologists). Results highlighted that pretreatment evaluation was not homogeneous among the respondents. The treatment of choice for the OP program resulted the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (66 %). Induction chemotherapy was proposed mostly in case of aggressive tumors such as advanced stage (T4 or N3) and/or unfavorable primary sites (hypopharynx). Moreover, after induction chemotherapy, for responders patients most participants (46 %) proposed concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while 18 and 19 % proposed radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy and cetuximab, respectively. For patients with stable disease after induction chemotherapy, the respondents declared to suggest surgery, radiotherapy and cetuximab or radiotherapy alone in 38, 32 and 15 % of cases, respectively. Results of the present survey highlighted the variability of therapeutic approaches offered in clinical practice for patients candidate to a larynx OP program. Analysis of abovementioned results may give the chance to modify some clinical attitudes and create the background for future clinical investigation in this field.

KW - Chemoradiotherapy

KW - Laryngeal tumor

KW - Organ preservation

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975761181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975761181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12032-016-0781-5

DO - 10.1007/s12032-016-0781-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84975761181

VL - 33

JO - Medical Oncology

JF - Medical Oncology

SN - 1357-0560

IS - 7

M1 - 76

ER -