Non-surgical periodontal treatment of peri-implant diseases with the adjunctive use of diode laser: preliminary clinical study

Francesco Lerario, Marisa Roncati, Annalisa Gariffo, Enrica Attorresi, Alessandra Lucchese, Alexandros Galanakis, Gaspare Palaia, Umberto Romeo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Peri-implant diseases present in two forms: peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. The prevalence of peri-implant complications is significantly rising. The aim of this study was to compare conventional treatment of inflamed peri-implant tissues with conventional treatment together with diode laser application. Twenty-seven patients (age 36 to 67, 15 women and 12 men, 12 smokers and 15 non-smokers) requiring treatment for mucositis or peri-implantitis were taken into account for this preliminary study. Plaque index (PI), pocket depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BoP) were recorded at baseline evaluation. Patients in control group (CG) received conventional non-surgical periodontal treatment. Patients in test group received conventional non-surgical periodontal treatment together with diode laser application (810 nm, 30 s, 1 W, 50 Hz, ton = 100 ms, toff = 100 ms, energy density = 24.87 J/cm2). Paired t test was used to evaluate the difference in repeated measurements of considered indexes at T0 and T1 (1 year) in both groups. A total of 606 sites were taken into account in the test group (TG) and 144 in the CG. PD mean variation in the TG was 2.66 mm ± 1.07, while mean PD variation in the CG was 0.94 ± 1.13 mm. Paired t testing of the variation in PD in CG and TG revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p <0.0001). A reduction of pathological sites from 89 % (T0) to 14.35 % (T1) was achieved in the TG, while reduction obtained in the CG was from 75.69 % (T0) to 50 % (T1); BoP scores at time T1 had fallen below 5 % in the TG and decreased to 59.7 %, in the CG. Within the limitations of this study, diode laser seems to be an additional valuable tool for peri-implant disease treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalLasers in Medical Science
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Semiconductor Lasers
Control Groups
Peri-Implantitis
Mucositis
Therapeutics
Hemorrhage
Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Laser therapy
  • Lasers
  • Peri-implantitis
  • Periodontal debridement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Cite this

Non-surgical periodontal treatment of peri-implant diseases with the adjunctive use of diode laser : preliminary clinical study. / Lerario, Francesco; Roncati, Marisa; Gariffo, Annalisa; Attorresi, Enrica; Lucchese, Alessandra; Galanakis, Alexandros; Palaia, Gaspare; Romeo, Umberto.

In: Lasers in Medical Science, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lerario, Francesco ; Roncati, Marisa ; Gariffo, Annalisa ; Attorresi, Enrica ; Lucchese, Alessandra ; Galanakis, Alexandros ; Palaia, Gaspare ; Romeo, Umberto. / Non-surgical periodontal treatment of peri-implant diseases with the adjunctive use of diode laser : preliminary clinical study. In: Lasers in Medical Science. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 1-6.
@article{5bfe24a3d4e84db09ee8e08f80b6fc56,
title = "Non-surgical periodontal treatment of peri-implant diseases with the adjunctive use of diode laser: preliminary clinical study",
abstract = "Peri-implant diseases present in two forms: peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. The prevalence of peri-implant complications is significantly rising. The aim of this study was to compare conventional treatment of inflamed peri-implant tissues with conventional treatment together with diode laser application. Twenty-seven patients (age 36 to 67, 15 women and 12 men, 12 smokers and 15 non-smokers) requiring treatment for mucositis or peri-implantitis were taken into account for this preliminary study. Plaque index (PI), pocket depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BoP) were recorded at baseline evaluation. Patients in control group (CG) received conventional non-surgical periodontal treatment. Patients in test group received conventional non-surgical periodontal treatment together with diode laser application (810 nm, 30 s, 1 W, 50 Hz, ton = 100 ms, toff = 100 ms, energy density = 24.87 J/cm2). Paired t test was used to evaluate the difference in repeated measurements of considered indexes at T0 and T1 (1 year) in both groups. A total of 606 sites were taken into account in the test group (TG) and 144 in the CG. PD mean variation in the TG was 2.66 mm ± 1.07, while mean PD variation in the CG was 0.94 ± 1.13 mm. Paired t testing of the variation in PD in CG and TG revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p <0.0001). A reduction of pathological sites from 89 {\%} (T0) to 14.35 {\%} (T1) was achieved in the TG, while reduction obtained in the CG was from 75.69 {\%} (T0) to 50 {\%} (T1); BoP scores at time T1 had fallen below 5 {\%} in the TG and decreased to 59.7 {\%}, in the CG. Within the limitations of this study, diode laser seems to be an additional valuable tool for peri-implant disease treatment.",
keywords = "Laser therapy, Lasers, Peri-implantitis, Periodontal debridement",
author = "Francesco Lerario and Marisa Roncati and Annalisa Gariffo and Enrica Attorresi and Alessandra Lucchese and Alexandros Galanakis and Gaspare Palaia and Umberto Romeo",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10103-015-1785-7",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Lasers in Medical Science",
issn = "0268-8921",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-surgical periodontal treatment of peri-implant diseases with the adjunctive use of diode laser

T2 - preliminary clinical study

AU - Lerario, Francesco

AU - Roncati, Marisa

AU - Gariffo, Annalisa

AU - Attorresi, Enrica

AU - Lucchese, Alessandra

AU - Galanakis, Alexandros

AU - Palaia, Gaspare

AU - Romeo, Umberto

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Peri-implant diseases present in two forms: peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. The prevalence of peri-implant complications is significantly rising. The aim of this study was to compare conventional treatment of inflamed peri-implant tissues with conventional treatment together with diode laser application. Twenty-seven patients (age 36 to 67, 15 women and 12 men, 12 smokers and 15 non-smokers) requiring treatment for mucositis or peri-implantitis were taken into account for this preliminary study. Plaque index (PI), pocket depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BoP) were recorded at baseline evaluation. Patients in control group (CG) received conventional non-surgical periodontal treatment. Patients in test group received conventional non-surgical periodontal treatment together with diode laser application (810 nm, 30 s, 1 W, 50 Hz, ton = 100 ms, toff = 100 ms, energy density = 24.87 J/cm2). Paired t test was used to evaluate the difference in repeated measurements of considered indexes at T0 and T1 (1 year) in both groups. A total of 606 sites were taken into account in the test group (TG) and 144 in the CG. PD mean variation in the TG was 2.66 mm ± 1.07, while mean PD variation in the CG was 0.94 ± 1.13 mm. Paired t testing of the variation in PD in CG and TG revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p <0.0001). A reduction of pathological sites from 89 % (T0) to 14.35 % (T1) was achieved in the TG, while reduction obtained in the CG was from 75.69 % (T0) to 50 % (T1); BoP scores at time T1 had fallen below 5 % in the TG and decreased to 59.7 %, in the CG. Within the limitations of this study, diode laser seems to be an additional valuable tool for peri-implant disease treatment.

AB - Peri-implant diseases present in two forms: peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. The prevalence of peri-implant complications is significantly rising. The aim of this study was to compare conventional treatment of inflamed peri-implant tissues with conventional treatment together with diode laser application. Twenty-seven patients (age 36 to 67, 15 women and 12 men, 12 smokers and 15 non-smokers) requiring treatment for mucositis or peri-implantitis were taken into account for this preliminary study. Plaque index (PI), pocket depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BoP) were recorded at baseline evaluation. Patients in control group (CG) received conventional non-surgical periodontal treatment. Patients in test group received conventional non-surgical periodontal treatment together with diode laser application (810 nm, 30 s, 1 W, 50 Hz, ton = 100 ms, toff = 100 ms, energy density = 24.87 J/cm2). Paired t test was used to evaluate the difference in repeated measurements of considered indexes at T0 and T1 (1 year) in both groups. A total of 606 sites were taken into account in the test group (TG) and 144 in the CG. PD mean variation in the TG was 2.66 mm ± 1.07, while mean PD variation in the CG was 0.94 ± 1.13 mm. Paired t testing of the variation in PD in CG and TG revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p <0.0001). A reduction of pathological sites from 89 % (T0) to 14.35 % (T1) was achieved in the TG, while reduction obtained in the CG was from 75.69 % (T0) to 50 % (T1); BoP scores at time T1 had fallen below 5 % in the TG and decreased to 59.7 %, in the CG. Within the limitations of this study, diode laser seems to be an additional valuable tool for peri-implant disease treatment.

KW - Laser therapy

KW - Lasers

KW - Peri-implantitis

KW - Periodontal debridement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953367557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953367557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10103-015-1785-7

DO - 10.1007/s10103-015-1785-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953367557

VL - 31

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Lasers in Medical Science

JF - Lasers in Medical Science

SN - 0268-8921

IS - 1

ER -