Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and Forrest's classification: Diagnostic agreement between endoscopists from the same area

A. Mondardini, C. Barletti, G. Rocca, A. Garripoli, A. Sambataro, C. Perotto, A. Repici, A. Ferrari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Study Aims: The lack of uniformity in defining the stigmata of hemorrhage in patients with bleeding ulcers is suggested by the wide range among published studies in prevalence and rebleeding rates for the same stigmata. Moreover there is, in published trials of endoscopic hemostasis, little standardization of definitions of stigmata of hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to assess the interobserver agreement among endoscopists from the same area (Piedmont and Valley of Aosta). Patients and Methods: A workshop for 47 expert endoscopists was organized in order to evaluate their agreement in the diagnosis of stigmata of recent hemorrhage, according to Forrest's classification. During the meeting 25 videotapes from endoscopic examinations of patients with recent non-variceal bleeding were shown to the 47 endoscopists, who were asked to classify every lesion. Results: The overall and beyond chance interobserver agreement was calculated by means of the kappa statistic. The overall agreement among endoscopists was highly significant (p <0.001, κ = 0.60), while the beyond chance agreement varied from excellent to good for lesions with active bleeding (κ= 0.76 and κ = 0.61 for FIA and FIB lesions respectively), whereas for lesions with stigmata of recent hemorrhage κ varied from 0.44 to 0.49. Conclusions: These data suggest the need for better knowledge of endoscopic criteria, in order to evaluate the results of endoscopic therapy and to assess new treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)508-512
Number of pages5
JournalEndoscopy
Volume30
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Christianity
Hemorrhage
Endoscopic Hemostasis
Videotape Recording
Ulcer
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Mondardini, A., Barletti, C., Rocca, G., Garripoli, A., Sambataro, A., Perotto, C., ... Ferrari, A. (1998). Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and Forrest's classification: Diagnostic agreement between endoscopists from the same area. Endoscopy, 30(6), 508-512.

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and Forrest's classification : Diagnostic agreement between endoscopists from the same area. / Mondardini, A.; Barletti, C.; Rocca, G.; Garripoli, A.; Sambataro, A.; Perotto, C.; Repici, A.; Ferrari, A.

In: Endoscopy, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1998, p. 508-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mondardini, A, Barletti, C, Rocca, G, Garripoli, A, Sambataro, A, Perotto, C, Repici, A & Ferrari, A 1998, 'Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and Forrest's classification: Diagnostic agreement between endoscopists from the same area', Endoscopy, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 508-512.
Mondardini A, Barletti C, Rocca G, Garripoli A, Sambataro A, Perotto C et al. Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and Forrest's classification: Diagnostic agreement between endoscopists from the same area. Endoscopy. 1998;30(6):508-512.
Mondardini, A. ; Barletti, C. ; Rocca, G. ; Garripoli, A. ; Sambataro, A. ; Perotto, C. ; Repici, A. ; Ferrari, A. / Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and Forrest's classification : Diagnostic agreement between endoscopists from the same area. In: Endoscopy. 1998 ; Vol. 30, No. 6. pp. 508-512.
@article{f0e8883faf5248dd8fd25676aa1e1b58,
title = "Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and Forrest's classification: Diagnostic agreement between endoscopists from the same area",
abstract = "Background and Study Aims: The lack of uniformity in defining the stigmata of hemorrhage in patients with bleeding ulcers is suggested by the wide range among published studies in prevalence and rebleeding rates for the same stigmata. Moreover there is, in published trials of endoscopic hemostasis, little standardization of definitions of stigmata of hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to assess the interobserver agreement among endoscopists from the same area (Piedmont and Valley of Aosta). Patients and Methods: A workshop for 47 expert endoscopists was organized in order to evaluate their agreement in the diagnosis of stigmata of recent hemorrhage, according to Forrest's classification. During the meeting 25 videotapes from endoscopic examinations of patients with recent non-variceal bleeding were shown to the 47 endoscopists, who were asked to classify every lesion. Results: The overall and beyond chance interobserver agreement was calculated by means of the kappa statistic. The overall agreement among endoscopists was highly significant (p <0.001, κ = 0.60), while the beyond chance agreement varied from excellent to good for lesions with active bleeding (κ= 0.76 and κ = 0.61 for FIA and FIB lesions respectively), whereas for lesions with stigmata of recent hemorrhage κ varied from 0.44 to 0.49. Conclusions: These data suggest the need for better knowledge of endoscopic criteria, in order to evaluate the results of endoscopic therapy and to assess new treatments.",
author = "A. Mondardini and C. Barletti and G. Rocca and A. Garripoli and A. Sambataro and C. Perotto and A. Repici and A. Ferrari",
year = "1998",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "508--512",
journal = "Endoscopy",
issn = "0013-726X",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and Forrest's classification

T2 - Diagnostic agreement between endoscopists from the same area

AU - Mondardini, A.

AU - Barletti, C.

AU - Rocca, G.

AU - Garripoli, A.

AU - Sambataro, A.

AU - Perotto, C.

AU - Repici, A.

AU - Ferrari, A.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Background and Study Aims: The lack of uniformity in defining the stigmata of hemorrhage in patients with bleeding ulcers is suggested by the wide range among published studies in prevalence and rebleeding rates for the same stigmata. Moreover there is, in published trials of endoscopic hemostasis, little standardization of definitions of stigmata of hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to assess the interobserver agreement among endoscopists from the same area (Piedmont and Valley of Aosta). Patients and Methods: A workshop for 47 expert endoscopists was organized in order to evaluate their agreement in the diagnosis of stigmata of recent hemorrhage, according to Forrest's classification. During the meeting 25 videotapes from endoscopic examinations of patients with recent non-variceal bleeding were shown to the 47 endoscopists, who were asked to classify every lesion. Results: The overall and beyond chance interobserver agreement was calculated by means of the kappa statistic. The overall agreement among endoscopists was highly significant (p <0.001, κ = 0.60), while the beyond chance agreement varied from excellent to good for lesions with active bleeding (κ= 0.76 and κ = 0.61 for FIA and FIB lesions respectively), whereas for lesions with stigmata of recent hemorrhage κ varied from 0.44 to 0.49. Conclusions: These data suggest the need for better knowledge of endoscopic criteria, in order to evaluate the results of endoscopic therapy and to assess new treatments.

AB - Background and Study Aims: The lack of uniformity in defining the stigmata of hemorrhage in patients with bleeding ulcers is suggested by the wide range among published studies in prevalence and rebleeding rates for the same stigmata. Moreover there is, in published trials of endoscopic hemostasis, little standardization of definitions of stigmata of hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to assess the interobserver agreement among endoscopists from the same area (Piedmont and Valley of Aosta). Patients and Methods: A workshop for 47 expert endoscopists was organized in order to evaluate their agreement in the diagnosis of stigmata of recent hemorrhage, according to Forrest's classification. During the meeting 25 videotapes from endoscopic examinations of patients with recent non-variceal bleeding were shown to the 47 endoscopists, who were asked to classify every lesion. Results: The overall and beyond chance interobserver agreement was calculated by means of the kappa statistic. The overall agreement among endoscopists was highly significant (p <0.001, κ = 0.60), while the beyond chance agreement varied from excellent to good for lesions with active bleeding (κ= 0.76 and κ = 0.61 for FIA and FIB lesions respectively), whereas for lesions with stigmata of recent hemorrhage κ varied from 0.44 to 0.49. Conclusions: These data suggest the need for better knowledge of endoscopic criteria, in order to evaluate the results of endoscopic therapy and to assess new treatments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031709182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031709182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9746157

AN - SCOPUS:0031709182

VL - 30

SP - 508

EP - 512

JO - Endoscopy

JF - Endoscopy

SN - 0013-726X

IS - 6

ER -