Noninvasive measurement of blood pressure variability

Accuracy of the Finometer monitor and comparison with the Finapres device

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess the accuracy of spectral indices of arterial pressure variability and baroreflex sensitivity obtained from beat-by-beat noninvasive blood pressure recordings by the Finometer device, we compared these measures with those obtained from intra-arterial recordings. The performance of the Finometer was also compared to the traditional Finapres device. In 19 cardiac disease patients, including myocardial infarction, heart failure and cardiac transplant, we estimated the power of systolic and diastolic pressures in the VLF (0.01-0.04 Hz), LF (0.04-0.15 Hz) and HF (0.15-0.45 Hz) bands and computed absolute and percentage errors relative to intra-arterial brachial pressure. We also computed the characteristic frequency of each band (i.e. the barycentric frequency of spectral components identified in the band). The variability of systolic pressure in the VLF and LF bands was markedly overestimated by both the Finometer and Finapres (p <0.01), with percentage median errors of respectively 130% and 103% (Finometer), and 134% and 78% (Finapres). The HF power was substantially unchanged using the Finometer and reduced using the Finapres (-28%, p <0.05). The limits of agreement between noninvasive and invasive spectral measurements were wide. Linear system analysis showed that most (>80%) of the power of noninvasive signals was linearly related to the power of the invasive signal. The characteristic frequency of each band was substantially preserved in both noninvasive signals. The results for diastolic pressure were similar, but the Finapres errors in the VLF and LF bands were lower. Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly underestimated by both devices (Finometer: -31%, Finapres: -24%). Despite previous studies having shown that brachial artery waveform reconstruction performed by the Finometer has improved the accuracy of blood pressure measurement compared to the Finapres device, measurement of blood pressure variability in cardiac disease patients provides worse results in most spectral parameters and a better accuracy only in the HF band of systolic pressure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1125-1136
Number of pages12
JournalPhysiological Measurement
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2005

Fingerprint

Blood pressure
Blood Pressure
Equipment and Supplies
Transplants
Pressure measurement
Baroreflex
Heart Diseases
Arterial Pressure
Brachial Artery
Arm
Heart Failure
Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

  • Blood pressure variability
  • Noninvasive baroreflex sensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

@article{a39429205a804a6f9390655774aa1971,
title = "Noninvasive measurement of blood pressure variability: Accuracy of the Finometer monitor and comparison with the Finapres device",
abstract = "To assess the accuracy of spectral indices of arterial pressure variability and baroreflex sensitivity obtained from beat-by-beat noninvasive blood pressure recordings by the Finometer device, we compared these measures with those obtained from intra-arterial recordings. The performance of the Finometer was also compared to the traditional Finapres device. In 19 cardiac disease patients, including myocardial infarction, heart failure and cardiac transplant, we estimated the power of systolic and diastolic pressures in the VLF (0.01-0.04 Hz), LF (0.04-0.15 Hz) and HF (0.15-0.45 Hz) bands and computed absolute and percentage errors relative to intra-arterial brachial pressure. We also computed the characteristic frequency of each band (i.e. the barycentric frequency of spectral components identified in the band). The variability of systolic pressure in the VLF and LF bands was markedly overestimated by both the Finometer and Finapres (p <0.01), with percentage median errors of respectively 130{\%} and 103{\%} (Finometer), and 134{\%} and 78{\%} (Finapres). The HF power was substantially unchanged using the Finometer and reduced using the Finapres (-28{\%}, p <0.05). The limits of agreement between noninvasive and invasive spectral measurements were wide. Linear system analysis showed that most (>80{\%}) of the power of noninvasive signals was linearly related to the power of the invasive signal. The characteristic frequency of each band was substantially preserved in both noninvasive signals. The results for diastolic pressure were similar, but the Finapres errors in the VLF and LF bands were lower. Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly underestimated by both devices (Finometer: -31{\%}, Finapres: -24{\%}). Despite previous studies having shown that brachial artery waveform reconstruction performed by the Finometer has improved the accuracy of blood pressure measurement compared to the Finapres device, measurement of blood pressure variability in cardiac disease patients provides worse results in most spectral parameters and a better accuracy only in the HF band of systolic pressure.",
keywords = "Blood pressure variability, Noninvasive baroreflex sensitivity",
author = "R. Maestri and Pinna, {G. D.} and E. Robbi and S. Capomolla and {La Rovere}, {M. T.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1088/0967-3334/26/6/021",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1125--1136",
journal = "Physiological Measurement",
issn = "0967-3334",
publisher = "Institute of Physics Publishing",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Noninvasive measurement of blood pressure variability

T2 - Accuracy of the Finometer monitor and comparison with the Finapres device

AU - Maestri, R.

AU - Pinna, G. D.

AU - Robbi, E.

AU - Capomolla, S.

AU - La Rovere, M. T.

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - To assess the accuracy of spectral indices of arterial pressure variability and baroreflex sensitivity obtained from beat-by-beat noninvasive blood pressure recordings by the Finometer device, we compared these measures with those obtained from intra-arterial recordings. The performance of the Finometer was also compared to the traditional Finapres device. In 19 cardiac disease patients, including myocardial infarction, heart failure and cardiac transplant, we estimated the power of systolic and diastolic pressures in the VLF (0.01-0.04 Hz), LF (0.04-0.15 Hz) and HF (0.15-0.45 Hz) bands and computed absolute and percentage errors relative to intra-arterial brachial pressure. We also computed the characteristic frequency of each band (i.e. the barycentric frequency of spectral components identified in the band). The variability of systolic pressure in the VLF and LF bands was markedly overestimated by both the Finometer and Finapres (p <0.01), with percentage median errors of respectively 130% and 103% (Finometer), and 134% and 78% (Finapres). The HF power was substantially unchanged using the Finometer and reduced using the Finapres (-28%, p <0.05). The limits of agreement between noninvasive and invasive spectral measurements were wide. Linear system analysis showed that most (>80%) of the power of noninvasive signals was linearly related to the power of the invasive signal. The characteristic frequency of each band was substantially preserved in both noninvasive signals. The results for diastolic pressure were similar, but the Finapres errors in the VLF and LF bands were lower. Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly underestimated by both devices (Finometer: -31%, Finapres: -24%). Despite previous studies having shown that brachial artery waveform reconstruction performed by the Finometer has improved the accuracy of blood pressure measurement compared to the Finapres device, measurement of blood pressure variability in cardiac disease patients provides worse results in most spectral parameters and a better accuracy only in the HF band of systolic pressure.

AB - To assess the accuracy of spectral indices of arterial pressure variability and baroreflex sensitivity obtained from beat-by-beat noninvasive blood pressure recordings by the Finometer device, we compared these measures with those obtained from intra-arterial recordings. The performance of the Finometer was also compared to the traditional Finapres device. In 19 cardiac disease patients, including myocardial infarction, heart failure and cardiac transplant, we estimated the power of systolic and diastolic pressures in the VLF (0.01-0.04 Hz), LF (0.04-0.15 Hz) and HF (0.15-0.45 Hz) bands and computed absolute and percentage errors relative to intra-arterial brachial pressure. We also computed the characteristic frequency of each band (i.e. the barycentric frequency of spectral components identified in the band). The variability of systolic pressure in the VLF and LF bands was markedly overestimated by both the Finometer and Finapres (p <0.01), with percentage median errors of respectively 130% and 103% (Finometer), and 134% and 78% (Finapres). The HF power was substantially unchanged using the Finometer and reduced using the Finapres (-28%, p <0.05). The limits of agreement between noninvasive and invasive spectral measurements were wide. Linear system analysis showed that most (>80%) of the power of noninvasive signals was linearly related to the power of the invasive signal. The characteristic frequency of each band was substantially preserved in both noninvasive signals. The results for diastolic pressure were similar, but the Finapres errors in the VLF and LF bands were lower. Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly underestimated by both devices (Finometer: -31%, Finapres: -24%). Despite previous studies having shown that brachial artery waveform reconstruction performed by the Finometer has improved the accuracy of blood pressure measurement compared to the Finapres device, measurement of blood pressure variability in cardiac disease patients provides worse results in most spectral parameters and a better accuracy only in the HF band of systolic pressure.

KW - Blood pressure variability

KW - Noninvasive baroreflex sensitivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28544438599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28544438599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0967-3334/26/6/021

DO - 10.1088/0967-3334/26/6/021

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1125

EP - 1136

JO - Physiological Measurement

JF - Physiological Measurement

SN - 0967-3334

IS - 6

ER -