Normalization of Functional Independence Measure variation improves assessment of stroke rehabilitation outcome

B. Lanzillo, G. Matarazzo, C. Calabrese, D. F. Vitale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Assessment of rehabilitation outcome is based on measuring the change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score between the start and end of rehabilitation. However, the raw FIM score gain is subject to a ceiling effect. Proposed solutions to this problem have incongruities that limit their use. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the factors that influence functional outcome in stroke rehabilitation, exploring the possibility of developing an outcome index free of the ceiling effect and of the incongruities revealed by the proposed solutions. Design: Retrospective study of the electronic clinical records of patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit over a period of 5 years. Setting: Rehabilitation unit. Population: A total of 224 patients admitted for first post-stroke rehabilitation of either ischaemic or hemorrhagic etiology. Methods: Rehabilitation outcome was evaluated based on changes in both raw and "normalized FIM motor and cognitive scores observed between hospital admission and discharge. Normalized differences are in the range 0-1 and may be considered an estimate of the actually attained fraction of the maximum expected recovery, while the modified algebraic formula (+1 to both numerator and denominator) is intended to correct the incongruities observed in available solutions. Seventeen prognostic factors were selected as possible effect modifiers of the outcome. A multivariable model-building strategy, based on fractional polynomials, was adopted to select the significant factors, and the stability of the results. Results: The procedure adopted to normalize both FIM outcomes resolves the ceiling effect and corrects the incongruities noted with available solutions. The level of disability at admission is confirmed as the strongest prognostic factor associated with both cognitive and motor outcomes. The onset-admission interval negatively influence motor recovery, bat not cognitive one. Conclusion: There is strong evidence to support the proposal that it is advantageous to measure functional recovery by means of the normalized change in FIM score. Following a rehabilitation programme, functional recovery should be evaluated separately for motor and cognitive domains. Rehabilitation program should begin as soon as possible. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Improved assessment of rehabilitation outcome leads to increased achievement of a favourable treatment outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)587-596
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume51
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Stroke Rehabilitation
Retrospective Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population

Keywords

  • Health care
  • Outcome assessment
  • Rehabilitation
  • Stroke
  • Treatment outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Normalization of Functional Independence Measure variation improves assessment of stroke rehabilitation outcome. / Lanzillo, B.; Matarazzo, G.; Calabrese, C.; Vitale, D. F.

In: European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 51, No. 5, 01.10.2015, p. 587-596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8ade71039e21450b996c297a45b67273,
title = "Normalization of Functional Independence Measure variation improves assessment of stroke rehabilitation outcome",
abstract = "Background: Assessment of rehabilitation outcome is based on measuring the change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) score between the start and end of rehabilitation. However, the raw FIM™ score gain is subject to a ceiling effect. Proposed solutions to this problem have incongruities that limit their use. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the factors that influence functional outcome in stroke rehabilitation, exploring the possibility of developing an outcome index free of the ceiling effect and of the incongruities revealed by the proposed solutions. Design: Retrospective study of the electronic clinical records of patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit over a period of 5 years. Setting: Rehabilitation unit. Population: A total of 224 patients admitted for first post-stroke rehabilitation of either ischaemic or hemorrhagic etiology. Methods: Rehabilitation outcome was evaluated based on changes in both raw and {"}normalized™ FIM™ motor and cognitive scores observed between hospital admission and discharge. Normalized differences are in the range 0-1 and may be considered an estimate of the actually attained fraction of the maximum expected recovery, while the modified algebraic formula (+1 to both numerator and denominator) is intended to correct the incongruities observed in available solutions. Seventeen prognostic factors were selected as possible effect modifiers of the outcome. A multivariable model-building strategy, based on fractional polynomials, was adopted to select the significant factors, and the stability of the results. Results: The procedure adopted to normalize both FIM™ outcomes resolves the ceiling effect and corrects the incongruities noted with available solutions. The level of disability at admission is confirmed as the strongest prognostic factor associated with both cognitive and motor outcomes. The onset-admission interval negatively influence motor recovery, bat not cognitive one. Conclusion: There is strong evidence to support the proposal that it is advantageous to measure functional recovery by means of the normalized change in FIM™ score. Following a rehabilitation programme, functional recovery should be evaluated separately for motor and cognitive domains. Rehabilitation program should begin as soon as possible. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Improved assessment of rehabilitation outcome leads to increased achievement of a favourable treatment outcome.",
keywords = "Health care, Outcome assessment, Rehabilitation, Stroke, Treatment outcome",
author = "B. Lanzillo and G. Matarazzo and C. Calabrese and Vitale, {D. F.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "587--596",
journal = "European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1973-9087",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normalization of Functional Independence Measure variation improves assessment of stroke rehabilitation outcome

AU - Lanzillo, B.

AU - Matarazzo, G.

AU - Calabrese, C.

AU - Vitale, D. F.

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Background: Assessment of rehabilitation outcome is based on measuring the change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) score between the start and end of rehabilitation. However, the raw FIM™ score gain is subject to a ceiling effect. Proposed solutions to this problem have incongruities that limit their use. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the factors that influence functional outcome in stroke rehabilitation, exploring the possibility of developing an outcome index free of the ceiling effect and of the incongruities revealed by the proposed solutions. Design: Retrospective study of the electronic clinical records of patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit over a period of 5 years. Setting: Rehabilitation unit. Population: A total of 224 patients admitted for first post-stroke rehabilitation of either ischaemic or hemorrhagic etiology. Methods: Rehabilitation outcome was evaluated based on changes in both raw and "normalized™ FIM™ motor and cognitive scores observed between hospital admission and discharge. Normalized differences are in the range 0-1 and may be considered an estimate of the actually attained fraction of the maximum expected recovery, while the modified algebraic formula (+1 to both numerator and denominator) is intended to correct the incongruities observed in available solutions. Seventeen prognostic factors were selected as possible effect modifiers of the outcome. A multivariable model-building strategy, based on fractional polynomials, was adopted to select the significant factors, and the stability of the results. Results: The procedure adopted to normalize both FIM™ outcomes resolves the ceiling effect and corrects the incongruities noted with available solutions. The level of disability at admission is confirmed as the strongest prognostic factor associated with both cognitive and motor outcomes. The onset-admission interval negatively influence motor recovery, bat not cognitive one. Conclusion: There is strong evidence to support the proposal that it is advantageous to measure functional recovery by means of the normalized change in FIM™ score. Following a rehabilitation programme, functional recovery should be evaluated separately for motor and cognitive domains. Rehabilitation program should begin as soon as possible. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Improved assessment of rehabilitation outcome leads to increased achievement of a favourable treatment outcome.

AB - Background: Assessment of rehabilitation outcome is based on measuring the change in Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) score between the start and end of rehabilitation. However, the raw FIM™ score gain is subject to a ceiling effect. Proposed solutions to this problem have incongruities that limit their use. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the factors that influence functional outcome in stroke rehabilitation, exploring the possibility of developing an outcome index free of the ceiling effect and of the incongruities revealed by the proposed solutions. Design: Retrospective study of the electronic clinical records of patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit over a period of 5 years. Setting: Rehabilitation unit. Population: A total of 224 patients admitted for first post-stroke rehabilitation of either ischaemic or hemorrhagic etiology. Methods: Rehabilitation outcome was evaluated based on changes in both raw and "normalized™ FIM™ motor and cognitive scores observed between hospital admission and discharge. Normalized differences are in the range 0-1 and may be considered an estimate of the actually attained fraction of the maximum expected recovery, while the modified algebraic formula (+1 to both numerator and denominator) is intended to correct the incongruities observed in available solutions. Seventeen prognostic factors were selected as possible effect modifiers of the outcome. A multivariable model-building strategy, based on fractional polynomials, was adopted to select the significant factors, and the stability of the results. Results: The procedure adopted to normalize both FIM™ outcomes resolves the ceiling effect and corrects the incongruities noted with available solutions. The level of disability at admission is confirmed as the strongest prognostic factor associated with both cognitive and motor outcomes. The onset-admission interval negatively influence motor recovery, bat not cognitive one. Conclusion: There is strong evidence to support the proposal that it is advantageous to measure functional recovery by means of the normalized change in FIM™ score. Following a rehabilitation programme, functional recovery should be evaluated separately for motor and cognitive domains. Rehabilitation program should begin as soon as possible. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Improved assessment of rehabilitation outcome leads to increased achievement of a favourable treatment outcome.

KW - Health care

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Stroke

KW - Treatment outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945965311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945965311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25573600

AN - SCOPUS:84945965311

VL - 51

SP - 587

EP - 596

JO - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1973-9087

IS - 5

ER -