Nutrieconomic model can facilitate healthy and low-cost food choices

Laura Primavesi, Giovanna Caccavelli, Alessandra Ciliberto, Emmanuel Pauze

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract Objective Promotion of healthy eating can no longer be postponed as a priority, given the alarming growth rate of chronic degenerative diseases in Western countries. We elaborated a nutrieconomic model to assess and identify the most nutritious and affordable food choices. Design Seventy-one food items representing the main food categories were included and their nationally representative prices monitored. Food composition was determined using CRA-NUT (Centro di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione) and IEO (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia) databases. To define food nutritional quality, the mean adequacy ratio and mean excess ratio were combined. Both prices and nutritional quality were normalised for the edible food content and for the recommended serving sizes for the Italian adult population. Setting Stores located in different provinces throughout Italy. Subjects Not applicable. Results Cereals and legumes presented very similar nutritional qualities and prices per serving. Seasonal fruits and vegetables presented differentiated nutritional qualities and almost equal prices. Products of animal origin showed similar nutritional qualities and varied prices: the best nutrieconomic choices were milk, oily fish and poultry for the dairy products, fish and meat groups, respectively. Conclusions Analysing two balanced weekly menus, our nutrieconomic model was able to note a significant decrease in cost of approximately 30 % by varying animal-protein sources without affecting nutritional quality. Healthy eating does not necessarily imply spending large amounts of money but rather being able to make nutritionally optimal choices. The nutrieconomic model is an innovative and practical way to help consumers make correct food choices and nutritionists increase the compliance of their patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)827-835
Number of pages9
JournalPublic Health Nutrition
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 8 2014

Fingerprint

Nutritive Value
Costs and Cost Analysis
Food
Fishes
Serving Size
Poultry Products
Dairy Products
Nutritionists
Patient Compliance
Fabaceae
Vegetables
Meat
Italy
Fruit
Milk
Chronic Disease
Databases
Growth
Population
Proteins

Keywords

  • Diet cost
  • Food analysis
  • Nutrieconomic analysis
  • Nutrient profiling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nutrieconomic model can facilitate healthy and low-cost food choices. / Primavesi, Laura; Caccavelli, Giovanna; Ciliberto, Alessandra; Pauze, Emmanuel.

In: Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 18, No. 5, 08.05.2014, p. 827-835.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Primavesi, L, Caccavelli, G, Ciliberto, A & Pauze, E 2014, 'Nutrieconomic model can facilitate healthy and low-cost food choices', Public Health Nutrition, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 827-835. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014002651
Primavesi, Laura ; Caccavelli, Giovanna ; Ciliberto, Alessandra ; Pauze, Emmanuel. / Nutrieconomic model can facilitate healthy and low-cost food choices. In: Public Health Nutrition. 2014 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 827-835.
@article{4fdbab9026ce4d10911bbe8dedd4887f,
title = "Nutrieconomic model can facilitate healthy and low-cost food choices",
abstract = "Abstract Objective Promotion of healthy eating can no longer be postponed as a priority, given the alarming growth rate of chronic degenerative diseases in Western countries. We elaborated a nutrieconomic model to assess and identify the most nutritious and affordable food choices. Design Seventy-one food items representing the main food categories were included and their nationally representative prices monitored. Food composition was determined using CRA-NUT (Centro di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione) and IEO (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia) databases. To define food nutritional quality, the mean adequacy ratio and mean excess ratio were combined. Both prices and nutritional quality were normalised for the edible food content and for the recommended serving sizes for the Italian adult population. Setting Stores located in different provinces throughout Italy. Subjects Not applicable. Results Cereals and legumes presented very similar nutritional qualities and prices per serving. Seasonal fruits and vegetables presented differentiated nutritional qualities and almost equal prices. Products of animal origin showed similar nutritional qualities and varied prices: the best nutrieconomic choices were milk, oily fish and poultry for the dairy products, fish and meat groups, respectively. Conclusions Analysing two balanced weekly menus, our nutrieconomic model was able to note a significant decrease in cost of approximately 30 {\%} by varying animal-protein sources without affecting nutritional quality. Healthy eating does not necessarily imply spending large amounts of money but rather being able to make nutritionally optimal choices. The nutrieconomic model is an innovative and practical way to help consumers make correct food choices and nutritionists increase the compliance of their patients.",
keywords = "Diet cost, Food analysis, Nutrieconomic analysis, Nutrient profiling",
author = "Laura Primavesi and Giovanna Caccavelli and Alessandra Ciliberto and Emmanuel Pauze",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1017/S1368980014002651",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "827--835",
journal = "Public Health Nutrition",
issn = "1368-9800",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nutrieconomic model can facilitate healthy and low-cost food choices

AU - Primavesi, Laura

AU - Caccavelli, Giovanna

AU - Ciliberto, Alessandra

AU - Pauze, Emmanuel

PY - 2014/5/8

Y1 - 2014/5/8

N2 - Abstract Objective Promotion of healthy eating can no longer be postponed as a priority, given the alarming growth rate of chronic degenerative diseases in Western countries. We elaborated a nutrieconomic model to assess and identify the most nutritious and affordable food choices. Design Seventy-one food items representing the main food categories were included and their nationally representative prices monitored. Food composition was determined using CRA-NUT (Centro di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione) and IEO (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia) databases. To define food nutritional quality, the mean adequacy ratio and mean excess ratio were combined. Both prices and nutritional quality were normalised for the edible food content and for the recommended serving sizes for the Italian adult population. Setting Stores located in different provinces throughout Italy. Subjects Not applicable. Results Cereals and legumes presented very similar nutritional qualities and prices per serving. Seasonal fruits and vegetables presented differentiated nutritional qualities and almost equal prices. Products of animal origin showed similar nutritional qualities and varied prices: the best nutrieconomic choices were milk, oily fish and poultry for the dairy products, fish and meat groups, respectively. Conclusions Analysing two balanced weekly menus, our nutrieconomic model was able to note a significant decrease in cost of approximately 30 % by varying animal-protein sources without affecting nutritional quality. Healthy eating does not necessarily imply spending large amounts of money but rather being able to make nutritionally optimal choices. The nutrieconomic model is an innovative and practical way to help consumers make correct food choices and nutritionists increase the compliance of their patients.

AB - Abstract Objective Promotion of healthy eating can no longer be postponed as a priority, given the alarming growth rate of chronic degenerative diseases in Western countries. We elaborated a nutrieconomic model to assess and identify the most nutritious and affordable food choices. Design Seventy-one food items representing the main food categories were included and their nationally representative prices monitored. Food composition was determined using CRA-NUT (Centro di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione) and IEO (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia) databases. To define food nutritional quality, the mean adequacy ratio and mean excess ratio were combined. Both prices and nutritional quality were normalised for the edible food content and for the recommended serving sizes for the Italian adult population. Setting Stores located in different provinces throughout Italy. Subjects Not applicable. Results Cereals and legumes presented very similar nutritional qualities and prices per serving. Seasonal fruits and vegetables presented differentiated nutritional qualities and almost equal prices. Products of animal origin showed similar nutritional qualities and varied prices: the best nutrieconomic choices were milk, oily fish and poultry for the dairy products, fish and meat groups, respectively. Conclusions Analysing two balanced weekly menus, our nutrieconomic model was able to note a significant decrease in cost of approximately 30 % by varying animal-protein sources without affecting nutritional quality. Healthy eating does not necessarily imply spending large amounts of money but rather being able to make nutritionally optimal choices. The nutrieconomic model is an innovative and practical way to help consumers make correct food choices and nutritionists increase the compliance of their patients.

KW - Diet cost

KW - Food analysis

KW - Nutrieconomic analysis

KW - Nutrient profiling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923942888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923942888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1368980014002651

DO - 10.1017/S1368980014002651

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 827

EP - 835

JO - Public Health Nutrition

JF - Public Health Nutrition

SN - 1368-9800

IS - 5

ER -