Objective assessment of speech after surgical treatment for oral cancer: Experience from 196 selected cases

Giovanni Nicoletti, David S. Soutar, Mary S. Jackson, Alan A. Wrench, Gerry Robertson, Chris Robertson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1992, a personal computer-based workstation for speech-digitized analysis was developed in conjunction with Canniesburn Hospital and Edinburgh University to measure all dispersion in speech after surgery for oral cancer. The voices of 196 patients with tumor of the oral cavity were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. Surgical resection was carefully mapped out on standard diagrams of the oral cavity. Patients' recordings were assessed for conversational understandability by two referees. Patients also self-scored their speech using the Functional Intraoral Glasgow Scale self-questionnaire. Many patients had similar if not identical resections; therefore, 12 homogeneous groups were identified. Functional outcome for speech was correlated with the site and size of resected tissue and with the reconstruction modalities. The original association of an objective, computer-based tool and two subjective assessment tools proved to be the most suitable investigation method for speech. The general pattern was for consistently better speech quality with smaller excisions. The reconstruction modalities did not seem to influence the overall speech quality, as it was related mainly to the extent of surgical demolition. The authors present a detailed correlation between site and size of excision and functional outcome using color multiple-view diagrams for immediate appreciation. Positive and negative prognostic factors were identified in surgery for oral cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-125
Number of pages12
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume113
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Mouth Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Mouth
Microcomputers
Color
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Objective assessment of speech after surgical treatment for oral cancer : Experience from 196 selected cases. / Nicoletti, Giovanni; Soutar, David S.; Jackson, Mary S.; Wrench, Alan A.; Robertson, Gerry; Robertson, Chris.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 113, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 114-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nicoletti, Giovanni ; Soutar, David S. ; Jackson, Mary S. ; Wrench, Alan A. ; Robertson, Gerry ; Robertson, Chris. / Objective assessment of speech after surgical treatment for oral cancer : Experience from 196 selected cases. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2004 ; Vol. 113, No. 1. pp. 114-125.
@article{a344441622f241ee8c0eaee665115228,
title = "Objective assessment of speech after surgical treatment for oral cancer: Experience from 196 selected cases",
abstract = "In 1992, a personal computer-based workstation for speech-digitized analysis was developed in conjunction with Canniesburn Hospital and Edinburgh University to measure all dispersion in speech after surgery for oral cancer. The voices of 196 patients with tumor of the oral cavity were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. Surgical resection was carefully mapped out on standard diagrams of the oral cavity. Patients' recordings were assessed for conversational understandability by two referees. Patients also self-scored their speech using the Functional Intraoral Glasgow Scale self-questionnaire. Many patients had similar if not identical resections; therefore, 12 homogeneous groups were identified. Functional outcome for speech was correlated with the site and size of resected tissue and with the reconstruction modalities. The original association of an objective, computer-based tool and two subjective assessment tools proved to be the most suitable investigation method for speech. The general pattern was for consistently better speech quality with smaller excisions. The reconstruction modalities did not seem to influence the overall speech quality, as it was related mainly to the extent of surgical demolition. The authors present a detailed correlation between site and size of excision and functional outcome using color multiple-view diagrams for immediate appreciation. Positive and negative prognostic factors were identified in surgery for oral cancer.",
author = "Giovanni Nicoletti and Soutar, {David S.} and Jackson, {Mary S.} and Wrench, {Alan A.} and Gerry Robertson and Chris Robertson",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.PRS.0000095937.45812.84",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "114--125",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objective assessment of speech after surgical treatment for oral cancer

T2 - Experience from 196 selected cases

AU - Nicoletti, Giovanni

AU - Soutar, David S.

AU - Jackson, Mary S.

AU - Wrench, Alan A.

AU - Robertson, Gerry

AU - Robertson, Chris

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - In 1992, a personal computer-based workstation for speech-digitized analysis was developed in conjunction with Canniesburn Hospital and Edinburgh University to measure all dispersion in speech after surgery for oral cancer. The voices of 196 patients with tumor of the oral cavity were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. Surgical resection was carefully mapped out on standard diagrams of the oral cavity. Patients' recordings were assessed for conversational understandability by two referees. Patients also self-scored their speech using the Functional Intraoral Glasgow Scale self-questionnaire. Many patients had similar if not identical resections; therefore, 12 homogeneous groups were identified. Functional outcome for speech was correlated with the site and size of resected tissue and with the reconstruction modalities. The original association of an objective, computer-based tool and two subjective assessment tools proved to be the most suitable investigation method for speech. The general pattern was for consistently better speech quality with smaller excisions. The reconstruction modalities did not seem to influence the overall speech quality, as it was related mainly to the extent of surgical demolition. The authors present a detailed correlation between site and size of excision and functional outcome using color multiple-view diagrams for immediate appreciation. Positive and negative prognostic factors were identified in surgery for oral cancer.

AB - In 1992, a personal computer-based workstation for speech-digitized analysis was developed in conjunction with Canniesburn Hospital and Edinburgh University to measure all dispersion in speech after surgery for oral cancer. The voices of 196 patients with tumor of the oral cavity were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. Surgical resection was carefully mapped out on standard diagrams of the oral cavity. Patients' recordings were assessed for conversational understandability by two referees. Patients also self-scored their speech using the Functional Intraoral Glasgow Scale self-questionnaire. Many patients had similar if not identical resections; therefore, 12 homogeneous groups were identified. Functional outcome for speech was correlated with the site and size of resected tissue and with the reconstruction modalities. The original association of an objective, computer-based tool and two subjective assessment tools proved to be the most suitable investigation method for speech. The general pattern was for consistently better speech quality with smaller excisions. The reconstruction modalities did not seem to influence the overall speech quality, as it was related mainly to the extent of surgical demolition. The authors present a detailed correlation between site and size of excision and functional outcome using color multiple-view diagrams for immediate appreciation. Positive and negative prognostic factors were identified in surgery for oral cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1242331965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1242331965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.PRS.0000095937.45812.84

DO - 10.1097/01.PRS.0000095937.45812.84

M3 - Article

C2 - 14707629

AN - SCOPUS:1242331965

VL - 113

SP - 114

EP - 125

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 1

ER -