Observing human movements helps decoding environmental forces

Myrka Zago, Barbara La Scaleia, William L. Miller, Francesco Lacquaniti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vision of human actions can affect several features of visual motion processing, as well as the motor responses of the observer. Here, we tested the hypothesis that action observation helps decoding environmental forces during the interception of a decelerating target within a brief time window, a task intrinsically very difficult. We employed a factorial design to evaluate the effects of scene orientation (normal or inverted) and target gravity (normal or inverted). Button-press triggered the motion of a bullet, a piston, or a human arm. We found that the timing errors were smaller for upright scenes irrespective of gravity direction in the Bullet group, while the errors were smaller for the standard condition of normal scene and gravity in the Piston group. In the Arm group, instead, performance was better when the directions of scene and target gravity were concordant, irrespective of whether both were upright or inverted. These results suggest that the default viewer-centered reference frame is used with inanimate scenes, such as those of the Bullet and Piston protocols. Instead, the presence of biological movements in animate scenes (as in the Arm protocol) may help processing target kinematics under the ecological conditions of coherence between scene and target gravity directions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-63
Number of pages11
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume215
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Gravitation
Biomechanical Phenomena
Observation
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Gravity
  • Interception
  • Pictorial
  • Scene inversion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Observing human movements helps decoding environmental forces. / Zago, Myrka; La Scaleia, Barbara; Miller, William L.; Lacquaniti, Francesco.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 215, No. 1, 11.2011, p. 53-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c6479c1c3807490092170ce21a22aee4,
title = "Observing human movements helps decoding environmental forces",
abstract = "Vision of human actions can affect several features of visual motion processing, as well as the motor responses of the observer. Here, we tested the hypothesis that action observation helps decoding environmental forces during the interception of a decelerating target within a brief time window, a task intrinsically very difficult. We employed a factorial design to evaluate the effects of scene orientation (normal or inverted) and target gravity (normal or inverted). Button-press triggered the motion of a bullet, a piston, or a human arm. We found that the timing errors were smaller for upright scenes irrespective of gravity direction in the Bullet group, while the errors were smaller for the standard condition of normal scene and gravity in the Piston group. In the Arm group, instead, performance was better when the directions of scene and target gravity were concordant, irrespective of whether both were upright or inverted. These results suggest that the default viewer-centered reference frame is used with inanimate scenes, such as those of the Bullet and Piston protocols. Instead, the presence of biological movements in animate scenes (as in the Arm protocol) may help processing target kinematics under the ecological conditions of coherence between scene and target gravity directions.",
keywords = "Gravity, Interception, Pictorial, Scene inversion",
author = "Myrka Zago and {La Scaleia}, Barbara and Miller, {William L.} and Francesco Lacquaniti",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-011-2871-0",
language = "English",
volume = "215",
pages = "53--63",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Observing human movements helps decoding environmental forces

AU - Zago, Myrka

AU - La Scaleia, Barbara

AU - Miller, William L.

AU - Lacquaniti, Francesco

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Vision of human actions can affect several features of visual motion processing, as well as the motor responses of the observer. Here, we tested the hypothesis that action observation helps decoding environmental forces during the interception of a decelerating target within a brief time window, a task intrinsically very difficult. We employed a factorial design to evaluate the effects of scene orientation (normal or inverted) and target gravity (normal or inverted). Button-press triggered the motion of a bullet, a piston, or a human arm. We found that the timing errors were smaller for upright scenes irrespective of gravity direction in the Bullet group, while the errors were smaller for the standard condition of normal scene and gravity in the Piston group. In the Arm group, instead, performance was better when the directions of scene and target gravity were concordant, irrespective of whether both were upright or inverted. These results suggest that the default viewer-centered reference frame is used with inanimate scenes, such as those of the Bullet and Piston protocols. Instead, the presence of biological movements in animate scenes (as in the Arm protocol) may help processing target kinematics under the ecological conditions of coherence between scene and target gravity directions.

AB - Vision of human actions can affect several features of visual motion processing, as well as the motor responses of the observer. Here, we tested the hypothesis that action observation helps decoding environmental forces during the interception of a decelerating target within a brief time window, a task intrinsically very difficult. We employed a factorial design to evaluate the effects of scene orientation (normal or inverted) and target gravity (normal or inverted). Button-press triggered the motion of a bullet, a piston, or a human arm. We found that the timing errors were smaller for upright scenes irrespective of gravity direction in the Bullet group, while the errors were smaller for the standard condition of normal scene and gravity in the Piston group. In the Arm group, instead, performance was better when the directions of scene and target gravity were concordant, irrespective of whether both were upright or inverted. These results suggest that the default viewer-centered reference frame is used with inanimate scenes, such as those of the Bullet and Piston protocols. Instead, the presence of biological movements in animate scenes (as in the Arm protocol) may help processing target kinematics under the ecological conditions of coherence between scene and target gravity directions.

KW - Gravity

KW - Interception

KW - Pictorial

KW - Scene inversion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82655162074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82655162074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-011-2871-0

DO - 10.1007/s00221-011-2871-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 21947172

AN - SCOPUS:82655162074

VL - 215

SP - 53

EP - 63

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 1

ER -