Occupational inequalities in health: Do occupational risks matter?

G. Costa, A. D'Errico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In all developed countries mortality, morbidity and disability show a decreasing social gradient of risk from the less to the more advantaged occupations. The health profile of an occupation is influenced directly by the exposure to occupational hazards in the specific workplace and indirectly by the disadvantaged social position to which the occupation belongs, that may severely limit the access to goods, services, opportunities, support, information, abilities that promote health. Alternatively, illness or its predictors may influence the occupational trajectory of a person, ending in a social segregation of unhealthy workers. How much relevant is each of these explanations of occupational health inequalities? Few longitudinal studies have tried to disentangle such different mechanisms of occupational health inequalities at the same time. In a Danish sample of 5000 workers two thirds of the social class gradient with regard to worsening of self-rated health over time could be explained by differences in work environment factors (ergonomic factors and repetitive work in particular) (Borg & Kristensen, 2000). On the contrary, in the Turin Longitudinal Study, occupational exposures were able to explain the male occupational class differences in mortality only to a moderate extent, probably due to misclassification of exposure (measured by a JEM), together with the fact that mortality is a less sensitive outcome for many occupational risk factors (Mamo et al., 2005). This paper will examine and discuss the relative importance of occupational and non- occupational risk factors in explaining social class inequalities for different health outcomes, in the light of both indirect evidence coming from the determinants of health inequalities and direct evidence coming from a review of adequate studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-157
Number of pages2
JournalMedicina del Lavoro
Volume97
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Occupational Health
Health
Occupational Exposure
Occupations
Social Class
Longitudinal Studies
Mortality
Health Occupations
Aptitude
Human Engineering
Vulnerable Populations
Developed Countries
Workplace
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Occupazional hazards
  • Socioeconomic status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Occupational inequalities in health : Do occupational risks matter? / Costa, G.; D'Errico, A.

In: Medicina del Lavoro, Vol. 97, No. 2, 03.2006, p. 156-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ea4944fe2a94f5ebb90ea7c96f5b161,
title = "Occupational inequalities in health: Do occupational risks matter?",
abstract = "In all developed countries mortality, morbidity and disability show a decreasing social gradient of risk from the less to the more advantaged occupations. The health profile of an occupation is influenced directly by the exposure to occupational hazards in the specific workplace and indirectly by the disadvantaged social position to which the occupation belongs, that may severely limit the access to goods, services, opportunities, support, information, abilities that promote health. Alternatively, illness or its predictors may influence the occupational trajectory of a person, ending in a social segregation of unhealthy workers. How much relevant is each of these explanations of occupational health inequalities? Few longitudinal studies have tried to disentangle such different mechanisms of occupational health inequalities at the same time. In a Danish sample of 5000 workers two thirds of the social class gradient with regard to worsening of self-rated health over time could be explained by differences in work environment factors (ergonomic factors and repetitive work in particular) (Borg & Kristensen, 2000). On the contrary, in the Turin Longitudinal Study, occupational exposures were able to explain the male occupational class differences in mortality only to a moderate extent, probably due to misclassification of exposure (measured by a JEM), together with the fact that mortality is a less sensitive outcome for many occupational risk factors (Mamo et al., 2005). This paper will examine and discuss the relative importance of occupational and non- occupational risk factors in explaining social class inequalities for different health outcomes, in the light of both indirect evidence coming from the determinants of health inequalities and direct evidence coming from a review of adequate studies.",
keywords = "Epidemiology, Occupazional hazards, Socioeconomic status",
author = "G. Costa and A. D'Errico",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "156--157",
journal = "Medicina del Lavoro",
issn = "0025-7818",
publisher = "Mattioli 1885 S.p.A.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occupational inequalities in health

T2 - Do occupational risks matter?

AU - Costa, G.

AU - D'Errico, A.

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - In all developed countries mortality, morbidity and disability show a decreasing social gradient of risk from the less to the more advantaged occupations. The health profile of an occupation is influenced directly by the exposure to occupational hazards in the specific workplace and indirectly by the disadvantaged social position to which the occupation belongs, that may severely limit the access to goods, services, opportunities, support, information, abilities that promote health. Alternatively, illness or its predictors may influence the occupational trajectory of a person, ending in a social segregation of unhealthy workers. How much relevant is each of these explanations of occupational health inequalities? Few longitudinal studies have tried to disentangle such different mechanisms of occupational health inequalities at the same time. In a Danish sample of 5000 workers two thirds of the social class gradient with regard to worsening of self-rated health over time could be explained by differences in work environment factors (ergonomic factors and repetitive work in particular) (Borg & Kristensen, 2000). On the contrary, in the Turin Longitudinal Study, occupational exposures were able to explain the male occupational class differences in mortality only to a moderate extent, probably due to misclassification of exposure (measured by a JEM), together with the fact that mortality is a less sensitive outcome for many occupational risk factors (Mamo et al., 2005). This paper will examine and discuss the relative importance of occupational and non- occupational risk factors in explaining social class inequalities for different health outcomes, in the light of both indirect evidence coming from the determinants of health inequalities and direct evidence coming from a review of adequate studies.

AB - In all developed countries mortality, morbidity and disability show a decreasing social gradient of risk from the less to the more advantaged occupations. The health profile of an occupation is influenced directly by the exposure to occupational hazards in the specific workplace and indirectly by the disadvantaged social position to which the occupation belongs, that may severely limit the access to goods, services, opportunities, support, information, abilities that promote health. Alternatively, illness or its predictors may influence the occupational trajectory of a person, ending in a social segregation of unhealthy workers. How much relevant is each of these explanations of occupational health inequalities? Few longitudinal studies have tried to disentangle such different mechanisms of occupational health inequalities at the same time. In a Danish sample of 5000 workers two thirds of the social class gradient with regard to worsening of self-rated health over time could be explained by differences in work environment factors (ergonomic factors and repetitive work in particular) (Borg & Kristensen, 2000). On the contrary, in the Turin Longitudinal Study, occupational exposures were able to explain the male occupational class differences in mortality only to a moderate extent, probably due to misclassification of exposure (measured by a JEM), together with the fact that mortality is a less sensitive outcome for many occupational risk factors (Mamo et al., 2005). This paper will examine and discuss the relative importance of occupational and non- occupational risk factors in explaining social class inequalities for different health outcomes, in the light of both indirect evidence coming from the determinants of health inequalities and direct evidence coming from a review of adequate studies.

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Occupazional hazards

KW - Socioeconomic status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349097847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38349097847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38349097847

VL - 97

SP - 156

EP - 157

JO - Medicina del Lavoro

JF - Medicina del Lavoro

SN - 0025-7818

IS - 2

ER -