OECI accreditation of the European Institute of Oncology of Milan

Strengths and weaknesses

Pietro L. Deriu, Silvia Basso, Fabrizio Mastrilli, Roberto Orecchia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The European Institute of Oncology began the process to reach the accreditation promoted by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) in 2012. This accreditation integrates the quality and safety path started in 2001 with accreditation by the Joint Commission International. Despite the presence of diversified accreditations and certifications and the clear need of time, effort, and commitment, the models are complementary. Each model is not to be considered as an end but as a tool for improvement: e.g., mixing accreditation standards led to an improvement in the quality and safety of processes. The present article details the OECI accreditation experience of the European Institute of Oncology, in particular the following strengths of OECI standards: collaboration among several involved parties (patient, volunteer, patient's general practitioner) in the clinical and quality/safety processes; a larger involvement of support personnel (psycho-oncologists, dieticians, physical therapists); and the development of clinical/translational research and innovation in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment to guarantee the best available practice in diagnosis and treatment. The OECI accreditation is specific to oncology and therefore its standards are tailored to a cancer center, both in terms of language used in the standards manual and in terms of patient needs. The OECI accreditation system puts an auditor team with a standards manual in charge of verifying quality and confirms the definition of IEO as a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S21-S24
JournalTumori
Volume101
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Accreditation
Organizations
Neoplasms
Safety
Translational Medical Research
Nutritionists
Physical Therapists
Certification
Quality Improvement
Practice Guidelines
General Practitioners
Volunteers
Language
Joints
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Accreditation
  • Cancer institute
  • Quality improvement
  • Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

OECI accreditation of the European Institute of Oncology of Milan : Strengths and weaknesses. / Deriu, Pietro L.; Basso, Silvia; Mastrilli, Fabrizio; Orecchia, Roberto.

In: Tumori, Vol. 101, 01.12.2015, p. S21-S24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deriu, Pietro L. ; Basso, Silvia ; Mastrilli, Fabrizio ; Orecchia, Roberto. / OECI accreditation of the European Institute of Oncology of Milan : Strengths and weaknesses. In: Tumori. 2015 ; Vol. 101. pp. S21-S24.
@article{17b9880ac5e640758fbdabe42c99e765,
title = "OECI accreditation of the European Institute of Oncology of Milan: Strengths and weaknesses",
abstract = "The European Institute of Oncology began the process to reach the accreditation promoted by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) in 2012. This accreditation integrates the quality and safety path started in 2001 with accreditation by the Joint Commission International. Despite the presence of diversified accreditations and certifications and the clear need of time, effort, and commitment, the models are complementary. Each model is not to be considered as an end but as a tool for improvement: e.g., mixing accreditation standards led to an improvement in the quality and safety of processes. The present article details the OECI accreditation experience of the European Institute of Oncology, in particular the following strengths of OECI standards: collaboration among several involved parties (patient, volunteer, patient's general practitioner) in the clinical and quality/safety processes; a larger involvement of support personnel (psycho-oncologists, dieticians, physical therapists); and the development of clinical/translational research and innovation in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment to guarantee the best available practice in diagnosis and treatment. The OECI accreditation is specific to oncology and therefore its standards are tailored to a cancer center, both in terms of language used in the standards manual and in terms of patient needs. The OECI accreditation system puts an auditor team with a standards manual in charge of verifying quality and confirms the definition of IEO as a Comprehensive Cancer Center.",
keywords = "Accreditation, Cancer institute, Quality improvement, Research",
author = "Deriu, {Pietro L.} and Silvia Basso and Fabrizio Mastrilli and Roberto Orecchia",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5301/tj.5000458",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "S21--S24",
journal = "Tumori",
issn = "0300-8916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - OECI accreditation of the European Institute of Oncology of Milan

T2 - Strengths and weaknesses

AU - Deriu, Pietro L.

AU - Basso, Silvia

AU - Mastrilli, Fabrizio

AU - Orecchia, Roberto

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The European Institute of Oncology began the process to reach the accreditation promoted by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) in 2012. This accreditation integrates the quality and safety path started in 2001 with accreditation by the Joint Commission International. Despite the presence of diversified accreditations and certifications and the clear need of time, effort, and commitment, the models are complementary. Each model is not to be considered as an end but as a tool for improvement: e.g., mixing accreditation standards led to an improvement in the quality and safety of processes. The present article details the OECI accreditation experience of the European Institute of Oncology, in particular the following strengths of OECI standards: collaboration among several involved parties (patient, volunteer, patient's general practitioner) in the clinical and quality/safety processes; a larger involvement of support personnel (psycho-oncologists, dieticians, physical therapists); and the development of clinical/translational research and innovation in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment to guarantee the best available practice in diagnosis and treatment. The OECI accreditation is specific to oncology and therefore its standards are tailored to a cancer center, both in terms of language used in the standards manual and in terms of patient needs. The OECI accreditation system puts an auditor team with a standards manual in charge of verifying quality and confirms the definition of IEO as a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

AB - The European Institute of Oncology began the process to reach the accreditation promoted by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) in 2012. This accreditation integrates the quality and safety path started in 2001 with accreditation by the Joint Commission International. Despite the presence of diversified accreditations and certifications and the clear need of time, effort, and commitment, the models are complementary. Each model is not to be considered as an end but as a tool for improvement: e.g., mixing accreditation standards led to an improvement in the quality and safety of processes. The present article details the OECI accreditation experience of the European Institute of Oncology, in particular the following strengths of OECI standards: collaboration among several involved parties (patient, volunteer, patient's general practitioner) in the clinical and quality/safety processes; a larger involvement of support personnel (psycho-oncologists, dieticians, physical therapists); and the development of clinical/translational research and innovation in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment to guarantee the best available practice in diagnosis and treatment. The OECI accreditation is specific to oncology and therefore its standards are tailored to a cancer center, both in terms of language used in the standards manual and in terms of patient needs. The OECI accreditation system puts an auditor team with a standards manual in charge of verifying quality and confirms the definition of IEO as a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

KW - Accreditation

KW - Cancer institute

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958626585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958626585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5301/tj.5000458

DO - 10.5301/tj.5000458

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - S21-S24

JO - Tumori

JF - Tumori

SN - 0300-8916

ER -