TY - JOUR
T1 - Oligometastatic colorectal cancer: prognosis, role of locoregional treatments and impact of first-line chemotherapy—a pooled analysis of TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies by Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest
AU - Moretto, Roberto
AU - Rossini, Daniele
AU - Zucchelli, Gemma
AU - Lonardi, Sara
AU - Bergamo, Francesca
AU - Santini, Daniele
AU - Cupini, Samanta
AU - Tomasello, Gianluca
AU - Caponnetto, Salvatore
AU - Zaniboni, Alberto
AU - Antoniotti, Carlotta
AU - Pietrantonio, Filippo
AU - Buonadonna, Angela
AU - Marmorino, Federica
AU - Bordonaro, Roberto
AU - Fea, Elena
AU - Tamburini, Emiliano
AU - Boccaccino, Alessandra
AU - Grande, Roberta
AU - Aprile, Giuseppe
AU - Falcone, Alfredo
AU - Cremolini, Chiara
N1 - Funding Information: F.P. reports having declared Honoraria/speaker's bureau from Roche, Amgen, Merck Serono, Lilly, Sanofi, Bayer, Servier; has received research grants from BMS . Funding Information: The study was supported by GONO and ARCO Foundations . Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Elsevier Ltd Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Background: Oligometastatic disease (OMD) identifies tumours with limited metastatic spread. OMD definition is not univocal and no data from clinical trials are available about the prognostic effect of OMD in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the impact of locoregional treatments (LRTs) and the effect of chemotherapy intensification in these patients. The role of tumour burden (TB) in driving therapeutic choices is also debated. Patients and methods: We performed a pooled analysis of phase III TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies comparing FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab (bev) to doublets (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI)/bev. Patients were grouped in OMD versus non-OMD based on the European Society for Medical Oncology definition. Among patients with OMD, those with OMD/low TB were compared with all the others. Results: Of 1187 patients enrolled, 1096 were classified as OMD (N = 312 [28%]) or non-OMD (N = 784 [72%]). Among patients with OMD, 126 (40%) were OMD/low TB. OMD was associated with longer progression-free survival (14.0 versus 10.1 months; p <0.01) and overall survival (38.2 versus 22.0 months; p <0.01). These results were confirmed in multivariable models. The benefit provided by FOLFOXIRI/bev compared with doublets/bev did not differ in accordance with OMD and TB (p for interaction >0.05). Patients with OMD underwent LRTs more frequently (p <0.01) and those with OMD/low TB had higher chance to undergo LRTs after the first progression (p <0.01). Conclusions: OMD is a positive prognostic factor in mCRC. The benefit from the upfront treatment intensification is independent of the metastatic spread extent and TB. LRTs should be highly considered in these patients, mainly during the first-line therapy but also at later stages of treatment history in selected cases.
AB - Background: Oligometastatic disease (OMD) identifies tumours with limited metastatic spread. OMD definition is not univocal and no data from clinical trials are available about the prognostic effect of OMD in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the impact of locoregional treatments (LRTs) and the effect of chemotherapy intensification in these patients. The role of tumour burden (TB) in driving therapeutic choices is also debated. Patients and methods: We performed a pooled analysis of phase III TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies comparing FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab (bev) to doublets (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI)/bev. Patients were grouped in OMD versus non-OMD based on the European Society for Medical Oncology definition. Among patients with OMD, those with OMD/low TB were compared with all the others. Results: Of 1187 patients enrolled, 1096 were classified as OMD (N = 312 [28%]) or non-OMD (N = 784 [72%]). Among patients with OMD, 126 (40%) were OMD/low TB. OMD was associated with longer progression-free survival (14.0 versus 10.1 months; p <0.01) and overall survival (38.2 versus 22.0 months; p <0.01). These results were confirmed in multivariable models. The benefit provided by FOLFOXIRI/bev compared with doublets/bev did not differ in accordance with OMD and TB (p for interaction >0.05). Patients with OMD underwent LRTs more frequently (p <0.01) and those with OMD/low TB had higher chance to undergo LRTs after the first progression (p <0.01). Conclusions: OMD is a positive prognostic factor in mCRC. The benefit from the upfront treatment intensification is independent of the metastatic spread extent and TB. LRTs should be highly considered in these patients, mainly during the first-line therapy but also at later stages of treatment history in selected cases.
KW - FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab
KW - Locoregional treatments
KW - Metastatic colorectal cancer
KW - Oligometastatic disease
KW - Tumour burden
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.08.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.08.009
M3 - Article
VL - 139
SP - 81
EP - 89
JO - Eur. J. Cancer
JF - Eur. J. Cancer
SN - 0959-8049
ER -