One model, several results: the paradox of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model.

G. Bertolini, R. D'Amico, D. Nardi, A. Tinazzi, G. Apolone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test, used extensively to assess the fit of the logistic regression model, is performed by several statistical packages. Recent studies have shown some problems in the use of this test when ties are present. These problems were attributed merely to the test implementation. METHODS: We analysed the order of the observations as an alternative explanation of the problem of ties. Using a data-set of 1393 intensive care unit (ICU) patients we performed the Hosmer-Lemeshow test with all possible subjects dispositions. RESULTS: We obtained about one million different P values, ranging from 0.01 to 0.95. DISCUSSION: It is already known that when the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test is performed with a number of covariate patterns lower than the number of subjects, its result may be inaccurate. We showed that the extent of this problem could be relevant under particular conditions. We also suggest a strategy for estimating the extent of the problem and subsequent interpretation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-253
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Volume5
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'One model, several results: the paradox of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this