Open access endoscopy: A large-scale analysis of its use in dyspeptic patients

Carlo Mansi, Giuseppe Sandro Mela, Vincenzo Savarino, Maria Raffaella Mele, Francesca Valle, Guido Celle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examined 2,253 consecutive dyspeptic patients referred to our endoscopy service by general practitioners (“open” group) and hospital clinicians (“clinic” group) to study the prevalence of the various endoscopic findings according to patient age and the route of endoscopic referral. The results obtained are representative of that specific population. Normal endoscopic findings progressively lessened as patients' age increased, and the overall rate was as low as 26.5% in the open and 30.3% in the clinic groups. Erosive prepyloric changes and duodenitis were the most frequently noted abnormalities in patients <40 years of age (16.9% and 20.1%, respectively, in the open and 11.6% and 14.2% in the clinic groups). Chronic gastritis was prevalent in patients > 60 years of age. Duodenal ulcer decreased from 9.7% (open) and 18% (clinic) in patients <40 to 2% and 1.1% in patients > 60. No malignancy was found in patients <40, while only ∼1% of those <60 had neoplasms. All our endoscopic findings, both in the open and the clinic groups, were not significantly different. No significant differences in symptoms were observed among patients with different endoscopic findings. We conclude that (a) endoscopy is really useful only in a small group of patients > 40 years of age; (b) individual symptoms alone have a poorly discriminant diagnostic power; and (c) restriction of open access endoscopy is not justified.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-154
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Volume16
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Endoscopy
Duodenitis
Duodenal Ulcer
General Practitioners
Referral and Consultation
Cross-Sectional Studies
Population
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Dyspepsia
  • Endoscopy
  • General practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Mansi, C., Mela, G. S., Savarino, V., Mele, M. R., Valle, F., & Celle, G. (1993). Open access endoscopy: A large-scale analysis of its use in dyspeptic patients. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 16(2), 149-154.

Open access endoscopy : A large-scale analysis of its use in dyspeptic patients. / Mansi, Carlo; Mela, Giuseppe Sandro; Savarino, Vincenzo; Mele, Maria Raffaella; Valle, Francesca; Celle, Guido.

In: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1993, p. 149-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mansi, C, Mela, GS, Savarino, V, Mele, MR, Valle, F & Celle, G 1993, 'Open access endoscopy: A large-scale analysis of its use in dyspeptic patients', Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 149-154.
Mansi C, Mela GS, Savarino V, Mele MR, Valle F, Celle G. Open access endoscopy: A large-scale analysis of its use in dyspeptic patients. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 1993;16(2):149-154.
Mansi, Carlo ; Mela, Giuseppe Sandro ; Savarino, Vincenzo ; Mele, Maria Raffaella ; Valle, Francesca ; Celle, Guido. / Open access endoscopy : A large-scale analysis of its use in dyspeptic patients. In: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 1993 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 149-154.
@article{2a290ff907a341ec89f640899ef4c286,
title = "Open access endoscopy: A large-scale analysis of its use in dyspeptic patients",
abstract = "We examined 2,253 consecutive dyspeptic patients referred to our endoscopy service by general practitioners (“open” group) and hospital clinicians (“clinic” group) to study the prevalence of the various endoscopic findings according to patient age and the route of endoscopic referral. The results obtained are representative of that specific population. Normal endoscopic findings progressively lessened as patients' age increased, and the overall rate was as low as 26.5{\%} in the open and 30.3{\%} in the clinic groups. Erosive prepyloric changes and duodenitis were the most frequently noted abnormalities in patients <40 years of age (16.9{\%} and 20.1{\%}, respectively, in the open and 11.6{\%} and 14.2{\%} in the clinic groups). Chronic gastritis was prevalent in patients > 60 years of age. Duodenal ulcer decreased from 9.7{\%} (open) and 18{\%} (clinic) in patients <40 to 2{\%} and 1.1{\%} in patients > 60. No malignancy was found in patients <40, while only ∼1{\%} of those <60 had neoplasms. All our endoscopic findings, both in the open and the clinic groups, were not significantly different. No significant differences in symptoms were observed among patients with different endoscopic findings. We conclude that (a) endoscopy is really useful only in a small group of patients > 40 years of age; (b) individual symptoms alone have a poorly discriminant diagnostic power; and (c) restriction of open access endoscopy is not justified.",
keywords = "Dyspepsia, Endoscopy, General practice",
author = "Carlo Mansi and Mela, {Giuseppe Sandro} and Vincenzo Savarino and Mele, {Maria Raffaella} and Francesca Valle and Guido Celle",
year = "1993",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "149--154",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology",
issn = "0192-0790",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open access endoscopy

T2 - A large-scale analysis of its use in dyspeptic patients

AU - Mansi, Carlo

AU - Mela, Giuseppe Sandro

AU - Savarino, Vincenzo

AU - Mele, Maria Raffaella

AU - Valle, Francesca

AU - Celle, Guido

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - We examined 2,253 consecutive dyspeptic patients referred to our endoscopy service by general practitioners (“open” group) and hospital clinicians (“clinic” group) to study the prevalence of the various endoscopic findings according to patient age and the route of endoscopic referral. The results obtained are representative of that specific population. Normal endoscopic findings progressively lessened as patients' age increased, and the overall rate was as low as 26.5% in the open and 30.3% in the clinic groups. Erosive prepyloric changes and duodenitis were the most frequently noted abnormalities in patients <40 years of age (16.9% and 20.1%, respectively, in the open and 11.6% and 14.2% in the clinic groups). Chronic gastritis was prevalent in patients > 60 years of age. Duodenal ulcer decreased from 9.7% (open) and 18% (clinic) in patients <40 to 2% and 1.1% in patients > 60. No malignancy was found in patients <40, while only ∼1% of those <60 had neoplasms. All our endoscopic findings, both in the open and the clinic groups, were not significantly different. No significant differences in symptoms were observed among patients with different endoscopic findings. We conclude that (a) endoscopy is really useful only in a small group of patients > 40 years of age; (b) individual symptoms alone have a poorly discriminant diagnostic power; and (c) restriction of open access endoscopy is not justified.

AB - We examined 2,253 consecutive dyspeptic patients referred to our endoscopy service by general practitioners (“open” group) and hospital clinicians (“clinic” group) to study the prevalence of the various endoscopic findings according to patient age and the route of endoscopic referral. The results obtained are representative of that specific population. Normal endoscopic findings progressively lessened as patients' age increased, and the overall rate was as low as 26.5% in the open and 30.3% in the clinic groups. Erosive prepyloric changes and duodenitis were the most frequently noted abnormalities in patients <40 years of age (16.9% and 20.1%, respectively, in the open and 11.6% and 14.2% in the clinic groups). Chronic gastritis was prevalent in patients > 60 years of age. Duodenal ulcer decreased from 9.7% (open) and 18% (clinic) in patients <40 to 2% and 1.1% in patients > 60. No malignancy was found in patients <40, while only ∼1% of those <60 had neoplasms. All our endoscopic findings, both in the open and the clinic groups, were not significantly different. No significant differences in symptoms were observed among patients with different endoscopic findings. We conclude that (a) endoscopy is really useful only in a small group of patients > 40 years of age; (b) individual symptoms alone have a poorly discriminant diagnostic power; and (c) restriction of open access endoscopy is not justified.

KW - Dyspepsia

KW - Endoscopy

KW - General practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027511693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027511693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8463620

AN - SCOPUS:0027511693

VL - 16

SP - 149

EP - 154

JO - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

JF - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

SN - 0192-0790

IS - 2

ER -