Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis

Federico Coccolini, Fausto Catena, Michele Pisano, Federico Gheza, Stefano Fagiuoli, Salomone Di Saverio, Gioacchino Leandro, Giulia Montori, Marco Ceresoli, Davide Corbella, Massimo Sartelli, Michael Sugrue, Luca Ansaloni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become a popular alternative to open cholecystectomy (OC) in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now considered the gold standard of therapy for symptomatic cholelithiasis and chronic cholecystitis. However no definitive data on its use in AC has been published. CIAO and CIAOW studies demonstrated 48.7% of AC were still operated with the open technique. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to compare OC and LC in AC. Material and methods: A systematic-review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of trials comparing open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with AC was performed. Electronic searches were performed using Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and CINAHL. Results: Ten trials have been included with a total of 1248 patients: 677 in the LC and 697 into the OC groups. The post-operative morbidity rate was half with LC (OR=0.46). The post-operative wound infection and pneumonia rates were reduced by LC (OR 0.54 and 0.51 respectively). The post-operative mortality rate was reduced by LC (OR=0.2). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shortened in the LC group (MD=-4.74 days). There were no significant differences in the bile leakage rate, intraoperative blood loss and operative times. Conclusions: In acute cholecystitis, post-operative morbidity, mortality and hospital stay were reduced by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moreover pneumonia and wound infection rate were reduced by LC. Severe hemorrhage and bile leakage rates were not influenced by the technique. Cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis should be attempted laparoscopically first.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)196-204
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Surgery
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Acute Cholecystitis
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Meta-Analysis
Cholecystectomy
Wound Infection
Bile
Length of Stay
Pneumonia
Morbidity
Cholecystitis
Cholelithiasis
Mortality
Operative Time
PubMed
Databases
Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Acute cholecystitis
  • Laparoscopic
  • Meta-analysis
  • Morbidity
  • Mortality
  • Open
  • Surgery
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Coccolini, F., Catena, F., Pisano, M., Gheza, F., Fagiuoli, S., Di Saverio, S., ... Ansaloni, L. (2015). Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery, 18, 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.083

Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. / Coccolini, Federico; Catena, Fausto; Pisano, Michele; Gheza, Federico; Fagiuoli, Stefano; Di Saverio, Salomone; Leandro, Gioacchino; Montori, Giulia; Ceresoli, Marco; Corbella, Davide; Sartelli, Massimo; Sugrue, Michael; Ansaloni, Luca.

In: International Journal of Surgery, Vol. 18, 01.06.2015, p. 196-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coccolini, F, Catena, F, Pisano, M, Gheza, F, Fagiuoli, S, Di Saverio, S, Leandro, G, Montori, G, Ceresoli, M, Corbella, D, Sartelli, M, Sugrue, M & Ansaloni, L 2015, 'Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis', International Journal of Surgery, vol. 18, pp. 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.083
Coccolini, Federico ; Catena, Fausto ; Pisano, Michele ; Gheza, Federico ; Fagiuoli, Stefano ; Di Saverio, Salomone ; Leandro, Gioacchino ; Montori, Giulia ; Ceresoli, Marco ; Corbella, Davide ; Sartelli, Massimo ; Sugrue, Michael ; Ansaloni, Luca. / Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. In: International Journal of Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 18. pp. 196-204.
@article{f4718f33a67940088ae39eddc0fe8929,
title = "Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become a popular alternative to open cholecystectomy (OC) in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now considered the gold standard of therapy for symptomatic cholelithiasis and chronic cholecystitis. However no definitive data on its use in AC has been published. CIAO and CIAOW studies demonstrated 48.7{\%} of AC were still operated with the open technique. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to compare OC and LC in AC. Material and methods: A systematic-review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of trials comparing open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with AC was performed. Electronic searches were performed using Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and CINAHL. Results: Ten trials have been included with a total of 1248 patients: 677 in the LC and 697 into the OC groups. The post-operative morbidity rate was half with LC (OR=0.46). The post-operative wound infection and pneumonia rates were reduced by LC (OR 0.54 and 0.51 respectively). The post-operative mortality rate was reduced by LC (OR=0.2). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shortened in the LC group (MD=-4.74 days). There were no significant differences in the bile leakage rate, intraoperative blood loss and operative times. Conclusions: In acute cholecystitis, post-operative morbidity, mortality and hospital stay were reduced by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moreover pneumonia and wound infection rate were reduced by LC. Severe hemorrhage and bile leakage rates were not influenced by the technique. Cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis should be attempted laparoscopically first.",
keywords = "Acute cholecystitis, Laparoscopic, Meta-analysis, Morbidity, Mortality, Open, Surgery, Treatment",
author = "Federico Coccolini and Fausto Catena and Michele Pisano and Federico Gheza and Stefano Fagiuoli and {Di Saverio}, Salomone and Gioacchino Leandro and Giulia Montori and Marco Ceresoli and Davide Corbella and Massimo Sartelli and Michael Sugrue and Luca Ansaloni",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.083",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "196--204",
journal = "International Journal of Surgery",
issn = "1743-9191",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Coccolini, Federico

AU - Catena, Fausto

AU - Pisano, Michele

AU - Gheza, Federico

AU - Fagiuoli, Stefano

AU - Di Saverio, Salomone

AU - Leandro, Gioacchino

AU - Montori, Giulia

AU - Ceresoli, Marco

AU - Corbella, Davide

AU - Sartelli, Massimo

AU - Sugrue, Michael

AU - Ansaloni, Luca

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become a popular alternative to open cholecystectomy (OC) in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now considered the gold standard of therapy for symptomatic cholelithiasis and chronic cholecystitis. However no definitive data on its use in AC has been published. CIAO and CIAOW studies demonstrated 48.7% of AC were still operated with the open technique. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to compare OC and LC in AC. Material and methods: A systematic-review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of trials comparing open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with AC was performed. Electronic searches were performed using Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and CINAHL. Results: Ten trials have been included with a total of 1248 patients: 677 in the LC and 697 into the OC groups. The post-operative morbidity rate was half with LC (OR=0.46). The post-operative wound infection and pneumonia rates were reduced by LC (OR 0.54 and 0.51 respectively). The post-operative mortality rate was reduced by LC (OR=0.2). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shortened in the LC group (MD=-4.74 days). There were no significant differences in the bile leakage rate, intraoperative blood loss and operative times. Conclusions: In acute cholecystitis, post-operative morbidity, mortality and hospital stay were reduced by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moreover pneumonia and wound infection rate were reduced by LC. Severe hemorrhage and bile leakage rates were not influenced by the technique. Cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis should be attempted laparoscopically first.

AB - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become a popular alternative to open cholecystectomy (OC) in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now considered the gold standard of therapy for symptomatic cholelithiasis and chronic cholecystitis. However no definitive data on its use in AC has been published. CIAO and CIAOW studies demonstrated 48.7% of AC were still operated with the open technique. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to compare OC and LC in AC. Material and methods: A systematic-review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of trials comparing open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with AC was performed. Electronic searches were performed using Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and CINAHL. Results: Ten trials have been included with a total of 1248 patients: 677 in the LC and 697 into the OC groups. The post-operative morbidity rate was half with LC (OR=0.46). The post-operative wound infection and pneumonia rates were reduced by LC (OR 0.54 and 0.51 respectively). The post-operative mortality rate was reduced by LC (OR=0.2). The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shortened in the LC group (MD=-4.74 days). There were no significant differences in the bile leakage rate, intraoperative blood loss and operative times. Conclusions: In acute cholecystitis, post-operative morbidity, mortality and hospital stay were reduced by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moreover pneumonia and wound infection rate were reduced by LC. Severe hemorrhage and bile leakage rates were not influenced by the technique. Cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis should be attempted laparoscopically first.

KW - Acute cholecystitis

KW - Laparoscopic

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Morbidity

KW - Mortality

KW - Open

KW - Surgery

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930426584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930426584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.083

DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.083

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 196

EP - 204

JO - International Journal of Surgery

JF - International Journal of Surgery

SN - 1743-9191

ER -