Operability of glioblastomas

"sins of action" versus "sins of non-action"

Paolo Ferroli, Marco Schiariti, Gaetano Finocchiaro, Andrea Salmaggi, Melina Castiglione, Francesco Acerbi, Giovanni Tringali, Mariangela Farinotti, Morgan Broggi, Cordella Roberto, Elio Maccagnano, Giovanni Broggi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite prognosis of glioblastomas is still poor, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resections are associated with longer life expectancy. However, the surgical indications, at present, are far from uniform and the concept of operability is extremely surgeon-dependant. The results of glioblastoma resection in 104 patients operated on between March 2005 and April 2011 were reviewed with the aim to shed some light on the limits between 'sins of action' (operating upon complex tumors causing a permanent severe deficit) and 'sins of non-action' (considering inoperable tumors that can be resected with good results). Fifty-five patients (54.4 %) (Group 1) presented with a 'disputable' surgical indication because of one or more of the following clinico-radiological aspects: involvement of motor and language areas (39.4 %), deep location (7.7 %), corpus callosum infiltration (13.4 %), or major vessels encasement (8.6 %). Forty-six (42.5 %) patients (Group 2) presented with an 'indisputable' surgical indication (readily accessible tumors in non-eloquent areas). Overall mortality was 2.9 %. The mean overall survival was 19.8 months and not significantly different in the two Groups (20.4 Group 2 and 19.5 months for Group 1; p = 0.7). Patients with GTR and

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2107-2116
Number of pages10
JournalNeurological Sciences
Volume34
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Glioblastoma
Neoplasms
Corpus Callosum
Motor Cortex
Life Expectancy
Language
Survival
Mortality

Keywords

  • Glioblastoma
  • Neurosurgery
  • Operability
  • Quality of life
  • Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Dermatology

Cite this

Operability of glioblastomas : "sins of action" versus "sins of non-action". / Ferroli, Paolo; Schiariti, Marco; Finocchiaro, Gaetano; Salmaggi, Andrea; Castiglione, Melina; Acerbi, Francesco; Tringali, Giovanni; Farinotti, Mariangela; Broggi, Morgan; Roberto, Cordella; Maccagnano, Elio; Broggi, Giovanni.

In: Neurological Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 12, 12.2013, p. 2107-2116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{53a4efc872c54b2dbe3020d51533dab1,
title = "Operability of glioblastomas: {"}sins of action{"} versus {"}sins of non-action{"}",
abstract = "Despite prognosis of glioblastomas is still poor, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resections are associated with longer life expectancy. However, the surgical indications, at present, are far from uniform and the concept of operability is extremely surgeon-dependant. The results of glioblastoma resection in 104 patients operated on between March 2005 and April 2011 were reviewed with the aim to shed some light on the limits between 'sins of action' (operating upon complex tumors causing a permanent severe deficit) and 'sins of non-action' (considering inoperable tumors that can be resected with good results). Fifty-five patients (54.4 {\%}) (Group 1) presented with a 'disputable' surgical indication because of one or more of the following clinico-radiological aspects: involvement of motor and language areas (39.4 {\%}), deep location (7.7 {\%}), corpus callosum infiltration (13.4 {\%}), or major vessels encasement (8.6 {\%}). Forty-six (42.5 {\%}) patients (Group 2) presented with an 'indisputable' surgical indication (readily accessible tumors in non-eloquent areas). Overall mortality was 2.9 {\%}. The mean overall survival was 19.8 months and not significantly different in the two Groups (20.4 Group 2 and 19.5 months for Group 1; p = 0.7). Patients with GTR and",
keywords = "Glioblastoma, Neurosurgery, Operability, Quality of life, Survival",
author = "Paolo Ferroli and Marco Schiariti and Gaetano Finocchiaro and Andrea Salmaggi and Melina Castiglione and Francesco Acerbi and Giovanni Tringali and Mariangela Farinotti and Morgan Broggi and Cordella Roberto and Elio Maccagnano and Giovanni Broggi",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10072-013-1345-5",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "2107--2116",
journal = "Neurological Sciences",
issn = "1590-1874",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operability of glioblastomas

T2 - "sins of action" versus "sins of non-action"

AU - Ferroli, Paolo

AU - Schiariti, Marco

AU - Finocchiaro, Gaetano

AU - Salmaggi, Andrea

AU - Castiglione, Melina

AU - Acerbi, Francesco

AU - Tringali, Giovanni

AU - Farinotti, Mariangela

AU - Broggi, Morgan

AU - Roberto, Cordella

AU - Maccagnano, Elio

AU - Broggi, Giovanni

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Despite prognosis of glioblastomas is still poor, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resections are associated with longer life expectancy. However, the surgical indications, at present, are far from uniform and the concept of operability is extremely surgeon-dependant. The results of glioblastoma resection in 104 patients operated on between March 2005 and April 2011 were reviewed with the aim to shed some light on the limits between 'sins of action' (operating upon complex tumors causing a permanent severe deficit) and 'sins of non-action' (considering inoperable tumors that can be resected with good results). Fifty-five patients (54.4 %) (Group 1) presented with a 'disputable' surgical indication because of one or more of the following clinico-radiological aspects: involvement of motor and language areas (39.4 %), deep location (7.7 %), corpus callosum infiltration (13.4 %), or major vessels encasement (8.6 %). Forty-six (42.5 %) patients (Group 2) presented with an 'indisputable' surgical indication (readily accessible tumors in non-eloquent areas). Overall mortality was 2.9 %. The mean overall survival was 19.8 months and not significantly different in the two Groups (20.4 Group 2 and 19.5 months for Group 1; p = 0.7). Patients with GTR and

AB - Despite prognosis of glioblastomas is still poor, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resections are associated with longer life expectancy. However, the surgical indications, at present, are far from uniform and the concept of operability is extremely surgeon-dependant. The results of glioblastoma resection in 104 patients operated on between March 2005 and April 2011 were reviewed with the aim to shed some light on the limits between 'sins of action' (operating upon complex tumors causing a permanent severe deficit) and 'sins of non-action' (considering inoperable tumors that can be resected with good results). Fifty-five patients (54.4 %) (Group 1) presented with a 'disputable' surgical indication because of one or more of the following clinico-radiological aspects: involvement of motor and language areas (39.4 %), deep location (7.7 %), corpus callosum infiltration (13.4 %), or major vessels encasement (8.6 %). Forty-six (42.5 %) patients (Group 2) presented with an 'indisputable' surgical indication (readily accessible tumors in non-eloquent areas). Overall mortality was 2.9 %. The mean overall survival was 19.8 months and not significantly different in the two Groups (20.4 Group 2 and 19.5 months for Group 1; p = 0.7). Patients with GTR and

KW - Glioblastoma

KW - Neurosurgery

KW - Operability

KW - Quality of life

KW - Survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890558696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890558696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10072-013-1345-5

DO - 10.1007/s10072-013-1345-5

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 2107

EP - 2116

JO - Neurological Sciences

JF - Neurological Sciences

SN - 1590-1874

IS - 12

ER -