Organ transplantation from marginal and non-standard risk donors

Ethical requisites for consent from recipients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In order to close the gap between available organs and patients needing transplants, the selection criteria for donors have gradually become more relaxed and many countries have defined expanded criteria for donor variables. However, the use of organs from marginal and non-standard risk donors poses considerable ethical issues. The acceptability of the risk/benefit ratio depends primarily on a clinical assessment, and information given to the recipient and his/her eventual consent are crucial. Some of the requisites concerning information and consent are mandatory. Once these requisites have been defined in binding regulations, adequate margins must be allowed for their personalisation and to account for the unique nature of each physician/patient relationship. Each decision should be specific for a particular person, and it must be accepted that similar clinical situations may give rise to differing solutions that are nonetheless agreed by the physician and the patient.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)350-353
Number of pages4
JournalAnnali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Organ Transplantation
Tissue Donors
Physician-Patient Relations
Ethics
Patient Selection
Odds Ratio
Physicians
Transplants

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Informed consent
  • Risk
  • Transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{281346e10c574711a9140fe36f75f1ba,
title = "Organ transplantation from marginal and non-standard risk donors: Ethical requisites for consent from recipients",
abstract = "In order to close the gap between available organs and patients needing transplants, the selection criteria for donors have gradually become more relaxed and many countries have defined expanded criteria for donor variables. However, the use of organs from marginal and non-standard risk donors poses considerable ethical issues. The acceptability of the risk/benefit ratio depends primarily on a clinical assessment, and information given to the recipient and his/her eventual consent are crucial. Some of the requisites concerning information and consent are mandatory. Once these requisites have been defined in binding regulations, adequate margins must be allowed for their personalisation and to account for the unique nature of each physician/patient relationship. Each decision should be specific for a particular person, and it must be accepted that similar clinical situations may give rise to differing solutions that are nonetheless agreed by the physician and the patient.",
keywords = "Ethics, Informed consent, Risk, Transplantation",
author = "Carlo Petrini",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4415/ANN_17_04_13",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "350--353",
journal = "Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita",
issn = "0021-2571",
publisher = "Istituto Superiore di Sanita",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organ transplantation from marginal and non-standard risk donors

T2 - Ethical requisites for consent from recipients

AU - Petrini, Carlo

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - In order to close the gap between available organs and patients needing transplants, the selection criteria for donors have gradually become more relaxed and many countries have defined expanded criteria for donor variables. However, the use of organs from marginal and non-standard risk donors poses considerable ethical issues. The acceptability of the risk/benefit ratio depends primarily on a clinical assessment, and information given to the recipient and his/her eventual consent are crucial. Some of the requisites concerning information and consent are mandatory. Once these requisites have been defined in binding regulations, adequate margins must be allowed for their personalisation and to account for the unique nature of each physician/patient relationship. Each decision should be specific for a particular person, and it must be accepted that similar clinical situations may give rise to differing solutions that are nonetheless agreed by the physician and the patient.

AB - In order to close the gap between available organs and patients needing transplants, the selection criteria for donors have gradually become more relaxed and many countries have defined expanded criteria for donor variables. However, the use of organs from marginal and non-standard risk donors poses considerable ethical issues. The acceptability of the risk/benefit ratio depends primarily on a clinical assessment, and information given to the recipient and his/her eventual consent are crucial. Some of the requisites concerning information and consent are mandatory. Once these requisites have been defined in binding regulations, adequate margins must be allowed for their personalisation and to account for the unique nature of each physician/patient relationship. Each decision should be specific for a particular person, and it must be accepted that similar clinical situations may give rise to differing solutions that are nonetheless agreed by the physician and the patient.

KW - Ethics

KW - Informed consent

KW - Risk

KW - Transplantation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040255406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040255406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4415/ANN_17_04_13

DO - 10.4415/ANN_17_04_13

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 350

EP - 353

JO - Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita

JF - Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita

SN - 0021-2571

IS - 4

ER -