TY - JOUR
T1 - Organic vs. psychogenic? The manichean diagnosis in sexual medicine
AU - Jannini, Emmanuele A.
AU - McCabe, Marita P.
AU - Salonia, Andrea
AU - Montorsi, Francesco
AU - Sachs, Benjamin D.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Introduction. The Manichean diagnosis, psychogenic or organic, is the first and most frequent diagnostic scope managing sexual disorders. The aim of this Controversy is to discuss if this philosophy is still useful both in the conceptual and clinical perspective. Methods.: Five scientists (an endocrinologist, two psychologist, and two urologists) with expertise in the area of psychosexology and sexual medicine were asked to contribute with their opinions. Main Outcome Measure.: Expert opinion supported by the critical review of the currently available literature. Result.: Expert # 1, who is Controversy's section Editor, suggests that the term psychogenic is redundant, because all sexual dysfunctions involve the mind and the relationship with (at least) one partner. Furthermore, he is strongly against the exclusion diagnosis, in agreement with the Expert # 5. The idea that the psychogenic etiology is always present is also sustained with good arguments by the Expert # 2. On the other hand, the two Experts # 3 and 4 argue that a pharmacological treatment such as type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors or dapoxetine work in both organic and psychogenic conditions and that the attempt to perform a diagnostic effort is frequently useless. Last but not least, the Expert # 5 concludes that the mind-body dualism is to be considered obsolete and unhelpful in a modern approach to the patient with a sexual dysfunction. Conclusions.: The reader of the Journal will judge if there is still a room for the Manichean diagnosis of different sexual dysfunctions or if it is time to completely change our perspective on this essential aspect of clinical sexual medicine.
AB - Introduction. The Manichean diagnosis, psychogenic or organic, is the first and most frequent diagnostic scope managing sexual disorders. The aim of this Controversy is to discuss if this philosophy is still useful both in the conceptual and clinical perspective. Methods.: Five scientists (an endocrinologist, two psychologist, and two urologists) with expertise in the area of psychosexology and sexual medicine were asked to contribute with their opinions. Main Outcome Measure.: Expert opinion supported by the critical review of the currently available literature. Result.: Expert # 1, who is Controversy's section Editor, suggests that the term psychogenic is redundant, because all sexual dysfunctions involve the mind and the relationship with (at least) one partner. Furthermore, he is strongly against the exclusion diagnosis, in agreement with the Expert # 5. The idea that the psychogenic etiology is always present is also sustained with good arguments by the Expert # 2. On the other hand, the two Experts # 3 and 4 argue that a pharmacological treatment such as type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors or dapoxetine work in both organic and psychogenic conditions and that the attempt to perform a diagnostic effort is frequently useless. Last but not least, the Expert # 5 concludes that the mind-body dualism is to be considered obsolete and unhelpful in a modern approach to the patient with a sexual dysfunction. Conclusions.: The reader of the Journal will judge if there is still a room for the Manichean diagnosis of different sexual dysfunctions or if it is time to completely change our perspective on this essential aspect of clinical sexual medicine.
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Organic
KW - Psychogenic
KW - Sexual Dysfunction
KW - Therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953553257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953553257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01824.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01824.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 20537061
AN - SCOPUS:77953553257
VL - 7
SP - 1726
EP - 1733
JO - Journal of Sexual Medicine
JF - Journal of Sexual Medicine
SN - 1743-6095
IS - 5
ER -