Original dissecting balloon for retroperitoneal laparoscopy: Cost-effective alternative to commercially available device

Andrea Cestari, Giorgio Guazzoni, Richard Naspro, Francesco Montorsi, Matteo Riva, Matteo Zanoni, Lorenzo Rigatti, Nicolò Buffi, Patrizio Rigatti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Creation of an optimal retroperitoneal space is of pivotal importance in laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the balloon dissecting technique developed at our institution, comparing the costs of our device with that of a commercially available balloon retroperitoneal expander. Patients and Methods: Twenty patients scheduled to undergo retroperitoneoscopic surgery were randomly divided in two groups. In group 1, retroperitoneal dilation was performed with the commercially available balloon expander. In group 2, we employed our balloon dilator created with two middle finger of No. 8 powder-free surgical gloves tied to a nondisposable 11-mm trocar and filled with 600 mL of saline employing two 60-mL syringes simultaneously. Subjective evaluation of the created space was performed blindly in both groups. Economic evaluation included the costs of the disposable materials and of the time required for dilation. Results: In all cases, the dilation was considered good. In group 1, the median time required to dilate the retroperitoneal space was 3.15 minutes, whereas in group 2, the median time required was 1.16 minutes, and the time required to dissect the retroperitoneal space was 4.41 minutes (total 5.57 minutes). Considering the costs of the disposable material, the overall costs of creating the retroperitoneal space was 141.95€ in group 1 and 60.27€ in group 2 (P <0.005). Conclusion: The original dissecting balloon employed at our institution is easy and fast and offers a valid option for the proper dissection of the retroperitoneal space. Moreover, it was revealed to be cost-effective compared with the commercially available device.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)714-717
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

Retroperitoneal Space
Laparoscopy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
Dilatation
Surgical Gloves
Syringes
Surgical Instruments
Powders
Fingers
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Dissection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Original dissecting balloon for retroperitoneal laparoscopy : Cost-effective alternative to commercially available device. / Cestari, Andrea; Guazzoni, Giorgio; Naspro, Richard; Montorsi, Francesco; Riva, Matteo; Zanoni, Matteo; Rigatti, Lorenzo; Buffi, Nicolò; Rigatti, Patrizio.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 21, No. 7, 07.2007, p. 714-717.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cestari, Andrea ; Guazzoni, Giorgio ; Naspro, Richard ; Montorsi, Francesco ; Riva, Matteo ; Zanoni, Matteo ; Rigatti, Lorenzo ; Buffi, Nicolò ; Rigatti, Patrizio. / Original dissecting balloon for retroperitoneal laparoscopy : Cost-effective alternative to commercially available device. In: Journal of Endourology. 2007 ; Vol. 21, No. 7. pp. 714-717.
@article{8e24fee002a145af8ab44c3e4650e402,
title = "Original dissecting balloon for retroperitoneal laparoscopy: Cost-effective alternative to commercially available device",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: Creation of an optimal retroperitoneal space is of pivotal importance in laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the balloon dissecting technique developed at our institution, comparing the costs of our device with that of a commercially available balloon retroperitoneal expander. Patients and Methods: Twenty patients scheduled to undergo retroperitoneoscopic surgery were randomly divided in two groups. In group 1, retroperitoneal dilation was performed with the commercially available balloon expander. In group 2, we employed our balloon dilator created with two middle finger of No. 8 powder-free surgical gloves tied to a nondisposable 11-mm trocar and filled with 600 mL of saline employing two 60-mL syringes simultaneously. Subjective evaluation of the created space was performed blindly in both groups. Economic evaluation included the costs of the disposable materials and of the time required for dilation. Results: In all cases, the dilation was considered good. In group 1, the median time required to dilate the retroperitoneal space was 3.15 minutes, whereas in group 2, the median time required was 1.16 minutes, and the time required to dissect the retroperitoneal space was 4.41 minutes (total 5.57 minutes). Considering the costs of the disposable material, the overall costs of creating the retroperitoneal space was 141.95€ in group 1 and 60.27€ in group 2 (P <0.005). Conclusion: The original dissecting balloon employed at our institution is easy and fast and offers a valid option for the proper dissection of the retroperitoneal space. Moreover, it was revealed to be cost-effective compared with the commercially available device.",
author = "Andrea Cestari and Giorgio Guazzoni and Richard Naspro and Francesco Montorsi and Matteo Riva and Matteo Zanoni and Lorenzo Rigatti and Nicol{\`o} Buffi and Patrizio Rigatti",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1089/end.2007.0358",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "714--717",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Original dissecting balloon for retroperitoneal laparoscopy

T2 - Cost-effective alternative to commercially available device

AU - Cestari, Andrea

AU - Guazzoni, Giorgio

AU - Naspro, Richard

AU - Montorsi, Francesco

AU - Riva, Matteo

AU - Zanoni, Matteo

AU - Rigatti, Lorenzo

AU - Buffi, Nicolò

AU - Rigatti, Patrizio

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Background and Purpose: Creation of an optimal retroperitoneal space is of pivotal importance in laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the balloon dissecting technique developed at our institution, comparing the costs of our device with that of a commercially available balloon retroperitoneal expander. Patients and Methods: Twenty patients scheduled to undergo retroperitoneoscopic surgery were randomly divided in two groups. In group 1, retroperitoneal dilation was performed with the commercially available balloon expander. In group 2, we employed our balloon dilator created with two middle finger of No. 8 powder-free surgical gloves tied to a nondisposable 11-mm trocar and filled with 600 mL of saline employing two 60-mL syringes simultaneously. Subjective evaluation of the created space was performed blindly in both groups. Economic evaluation included the costs of the disposable materials and of the time required for dilation. Results: In all cases, the dilation was considered good. In group 1, the median time required to dilate the retroperitoneal space was 3.15 minutes, whereas in group 2, the median time required was 1.16 minutes, and the time required to dissect the retroperitoneal space was 4.41 minutes (total 5.57 minutes). Considering the costs of the disposable material, the overall costs of creating the retroperitoneal space was 141.95€ in group 1 and 60.27€ in group 2 (P <0.005). Conclusion: The original dissecting balloon employed at our institution is easy and fast and offers a valid option for the proper dissection of the retroperitoneal space. Moreover, it was revealed to be cost-effective compared with the commercially available device.

AB - Background and Purpose: Creation of an optimal retroperitoneal space is of pivotal importance in laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the balloon dissecting technique developed at our institution, comparing the costs of our device with that of a commercially available balloon retroperitoneal expander. Patients and Methods: Twenty patients scheduled to undergo retroperitoneoscopic surgery were randomly divided in two groups. In group 1, retroperitoneal dilation was performed with the commercially available balloon expander. In group 2, we employed our balloon dilator created with two middle finger of No. 8 powder-free surgical gloves tied to a nondisposable 11-mm trocar and filled with 600 mL of saline employing two 60-mL syringes simultaneously. Subjective evaluation of the created space was performed blindly in both groups. Economic evaluation included the costs of the disposable materials and of the time required for dilation. Results: In all cases, the dilation was considered good. In group 1, the median time required to dilate the retroperitoneal space was 3.15 minutes, whereas in group 2, the median time required was 1.16 minutes, and the time required to dissect the retroperitoneal space was 4.41 minutes (total 5.57 minutes). Considering the costs of the disposable material, the overall costs of creating the retroperitoneal space was 141.95€ in group 1 and 60.27€ in group 2 (P <0.005). Conclusion: The original dissecting balloon employed at our institution is easy and fast and offers a valid option for the proper dissection of the retroperitoneal space. Moreover, it was revealed to be cost-effective compared with the commercially available device.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548180285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548180285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2007.0358

DO - 10.1089/end.2007.0358

M3 - Article

C2 - 17705756

AN - SCOPUS:34548180285

VL - 21

SP - 714

EP - 717

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 7

ER -