Origins, controversies and recent developments of the MCI construct

G. Gainotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The MCI construct aims to investigate the grey area existing between normal aging and dementia, in order to identify in the preclinical stage patients at risk of developing dementia. The construct of the MCI has been proposed by taking the neuropathological staging of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) as reference and providing an explicit set of identifying criteria, but it has raised two main problems: (a) the variability of estimates concerning the actual rate of conversion from MCI to dementia, and (b) the number of subjects who return to normality. These problems stem in part from the operational difficulties met by the MCI identifying criteria concerned with: the memory tests used, the cut-off adopted to identify patients with an 'objective' memory disorder, the assessment of subjective memory disorders, and the integrity of daily living activities. After a short discussion of these operational difficulties, I will pass to shortly survey the laboratory data providing additional predictive value for the conversion of MCI to dementia (ApoE4, CSF biomarkers, Neuroimaging data, and Vascular risk factors) and some recent attempts to identify pre-MCI patients, with a purely subjective cognitive impairment. I will conclude my review by asking if we have a single MCI or a family of MCI constructs, each of whom could play a preferential role in specific clinical contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-279
Number of pages9
JournalCurrent Alzheimer Research
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Dementia
Memory Disorders
Apolipoprotein E4
Activities of Daily Living
Neuroimaging
Alzheimer Disease
Biomarkers

Keywords

  • Conversion to dementia
  • Cut-off points
  • Daily living activities
  • Delayed recall
  • Return to normality
  • Subjective cognitive impairment
  • Subjective memory disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Origins, controversies and recent developments of the MCI construct. / Gainotti, G.

In: Current Alzheimer Research, Vol. 7, No. 3, 05.2010, p. 271-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d36f58208be942e0b4f5095db6129e32,
title = "Origins, controversies and recent developments of the MCI construct",
abstract = "The MCI construct aims to investigate the grey area existing between normal aging and dementia, in order to identify in the preclinical stage patients at risk of developing dementia. The construct of the MCI has been proposed by taking the neuropathological staging of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) as reference and providing an explicit set of identifying criteria, but it has raised two main problems: (a) the variability of estimates concerning the actual rate of conversion from MCI to dementia, and (b) the number of subjects who return to normality. These problems stem in part from the operational difficulties met by the MCI identifying criteria concerned with: the memory tests used, the cut-off adopted to identify patients with an 'objective' memory disorder, the assessment of subjective memory disorders, and the integrity of daily living activities. After a short discussion of these operational difficulties, I will pass to shortly survey the laboratory data providing additional predictive value for the conversion of MCI to dementia (ApoE4, CSF biomarkers, Neuroimaging data, and Vascular risk factors) and some recent attempts to identify pre-MCI patients, with a purely subjective cognitive impairment. I will conclude my review by asking if we have a single MCI or a family of MCI constructs, each of whom could play a preferential role in specific clinical contexts.",
keywords = "Conversion to dementia, Cut-off points, Daily living activities, Delayed recall, Return to normality, Subjective cognitive impairment, Subjective memory disorders",
author = "G. Gainotti",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.2174/156720510791050858",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "271--279",
journal = "Current Alzheimer Research",
issn = "1567-2050",
publisher = "Bentham Science Publishers B.V.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Origins, controversies and recent developments of the MCI construct

AU - Gainotti, G.

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - The MCI construct aims to investigate the grey area existing between normal aging and dementia, in order to identify in the preclinical stage patients at risk of developing dementia. The construct of the MCI has been proposed by taking the neuropathological staging of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) as reference and providing an explicit set of identifying criteria, but it has raised two main problems: (a) the variability of estimates concerning the actual rate of conversion from MCI to dementia, and (b) the number of subjects who return to normality. These problems stem in part from the operational difficulties met by the MCI identifying criteria concerned with: the memory tests used, the cut-off adopted to identify patients with an 'objective' memory disorder, the assessment of subjective memory disorders, and the integrity of daily living activities. After a short discussion of these operational difficulties, I will pass to shortly survey the laboratory data providing additional predictive value for the conversion of MCI to dementia (ApoE4, CSF biomarkers, Neuroimaging data, and Vascular risk factors) and some recent attempts to identify pre-MCI patients, with a purely subjective cognitive impairment. I will conclude my review by asking if we have a single MCI or a family of MCI constructs, each of whom could play a preferential role in specific clinical contexts.

AB - The MCI construct aims to investigate the grey area existing between normal aging and dementia, in order to identify in the preclinical stage patients at risk of developing dementia. The construct of the MCI has been proposed by taking the neuropathological staging of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) as reference and providing an explicit set of identifying criteria, but it has raised two main problems: (a) the variability of estimates concerning the actual rate of conversion from MCI to dementia, and (b) the number of subjects who return to normality. These problems stem in part from the operational difficulties met by the MCI identifying criteria concerned with: the memory tests used, the cut-off adopted to identify patients with an 'objective' memory disorder, the assessment of subjective memory disorders, and the integrity of daily living activities. After a short discussion of these operational difficulties, I will pass to shortly survey the laboratory data providing additional predictive value for the conversion of MCI to dementia (ApoE4, CSF biomarkers, Neuroimaging data, and Vascular risk factors) and some recent attempts to identify pre-MCI patients, with a purely subjective cognitive impairment. I will conclude my review by asking if we have a single MCI or a family of MCI constructs, each of whom could play a preferential role in specific clinical contexts.

KW - Conversion to dementia

KW - Cut-off points

KW - Daily living activities

KW - Delayed recall

KW - Return to normality

KW - Subjective cognitive impairment

KW - Subjective memory disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952500440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952500440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2174/156720510791050858

DO - 10.2174/156720510791050858

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 271

EP - 279

JO - Current Alzheimer Research

JF - Current Alzheimer Research

SN - 1567-2050

IS - 3

ER -