Osimertinib versus platinum–pemetrexed for patients with EGFR T790M advanced NSCLC and progression on a prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor: AURA3 overall survival analysis

V. A. Papadimitrakopoulou, T. S. Mok, J. Y. Han, M. J. Ahn, A. Delmonte, S. S. Ramalingam, S. W. Kim, F. A. Shepherd, J. Laskin, Y. He, H. Akamatsu, W. S.M.E. Theelen, W. C. Su, T. John, M. Sebastian, H. Mann, M. Miranda, G. Laus, Y. Rukazenkov, Y. L. Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: In AURA3 (NCT02151981), osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), significantly prolonged progression-free survival and improved response in patients with EGFR T790M advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and progression on prior EGFR-TKI treatment. We report the final AURA3 overall survival (OS) analysis. Patients and methods: Adult patients were randomized 2 : 1 to osimertinib (80 mg orally, once daily) or pemetrexed plus carboplatin/cisplatin (platinum–pemetrexed) intravenously, every 3 weeks (≤6 cycles). Patients could crossover to osimertinib on progression confirmed by blinded independent central review. OS and safety were secondary end points. Results: A total of 279 patients were randomly assigned to receive osimertinib and 140 to platinum–pemetrexed (136 received treatment). At data cut-off (DCO; 15 March 2019), 188 patients (67%) receiving osimertinib versus 93 (66%) receiving platinum–pemetrexed had died. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–1.12; P = 0.277]; the median OS was 26.8 months (95% CI 23.5–31.5) versus 22.5 months (95% CI 20.2–28.8) for osimertinib and platinum–pemetrexed, respectively. The estimated 24- and 36-month survival was 55% versus 43% and 37% versus 30%, respectively. After crossover adjustment, there was an HR of 0.54 (95% CI 0.18–1.6). Time to first subsequent therapy or death showed a clinically meaningful advantage toward osimertinib (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.16–0.28; P < 0.001). At DCO, 99/136 (73%) patients in the platinum–pemetrexed arm had crossed over to osimertinib, 66/99 (67%) of whom had died. The most common adverse events possibly related to study treatment were diarrhea (32%; grade ≥3, 1%) and rash (grouped term; 32%; grade ≥3, <1%) in the osimertinib arm, versus nausea (47%; grade ≥3, 3%) in the platinum–pemetrexed arm. Conclusions: In patients with T790M advanced NSCLC, no statistically significant benefit in OS was observed for osimertinib versus platinum–pemetrexed, which possibly reflects the high crossover rate of patients from platinum–pemetrexed to osimertinib. Clinical trials number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02151981; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02151981.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1536-1544
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Oncology
Volume31
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

Keywords

  • AURA3
  • epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor
  • non-small-cell lung cancer
  • osimertinib
  • overall survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Osimertinib versus platinum–pemetrexed for patients with EGFR T790M advanced NSCLC and progression on a prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor: AURA3 overall survival analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this