Outcome measures for children with movement disorders

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The huge contribution of advances in the pediatric neurosciences, improvements in clinical practice, and new therapeutic options, has led to the development of new models of treatment and rehabilitation for dystonia in the last decade. It is now generally agreed that a multidimensional therapeutic approach is needed for children with motor disorders, whose motor function-conceived as a complex perceptive, motor and cognitive process - is impaired at a crucial time in their development, with a fall out on how their various adaptive functions evolve. Neurophysiological studies, modern neuroimaging techniques, and advances in cognitive psychology have all contributed to improving our understanding of the potential effects of treatments in early age - not only on the symptoms, but also on plasticity processes and neuronal reorganization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) promoted by the WHO, and the diffusion of family-centered models of healthcare have underscored the importance of the ecological perspective with a view to providing effective therapies and a satisfactory quality of life for dystonic children and their families. The advances made in this area have made it necessary to study and develope more appropriate treatment outcome measures. In the light of these aspects, there is still not enough literature on the generally-accepted, exhaustive dystonia assessment tools. Given these limits, it might be useful to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the main tools currently used in this setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)346-353
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Paediatric Neurology
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Movement Disorders
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Dystonia
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
Therapeutics
Neuronal Plasticity
Neurosciences
Neuroimaging
Rehabilitation
Quality of Life
Pediatrics
Psychology
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Childhood onset dystonia
  • Movement disorders
  • Outcome measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Outcome measures for children with movement disorders. / Pagliano, Emanuela; Baranello, Giovanni; Masson, Riccardo; Foscan, Maria; Arnoldi, Maria Teresa; Marchi, Alessia; Aprile, Giorgia; Pantaleoni, Chiara.

In: European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 346-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{b341faf46f0644c1b2d22760fc0cca81,
title = "Outcome measures for children with movement disorders",
abstract = "The huge contribution of advances in the pediatric neurosciences, improvements in clinical practice, and new therapeutic options, has led to the development of new models of treatment and rehabilitation for dystonia in the last decade. It is now generally agreed that a multidimensional therapeutic approach is needed for children with motor disorders, whose motor function-conceived as a complex perceptive, motor and cognitive process - is impaired at a crucial time in their development, with a fall out on how their various adaptive functions evolve. Neurophysiological studies, modern neuroimaging techniques, and advances in cognitive psychology have all contributed to improving our understanding of the potential effects of treatments in early age - not only on the symptoms, but also on plasticity processes and neuronal reorganization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) promoted by the WHO, and the diffusion of family-centered models of healthcare have underscored the importance of the ecological perspective with a view to providing effective therapies and a satisfactory quality of life for dystonic children and their families. The advances made in this area have made it necessary to study and develope more appropriate treatment outcome measures. In the light of these aspects, there is still not enough literature on the generally-accepted, exhaustive dystonia assessment tools. Given these limits, it might be useful to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the main tools currently used in this setting.",
keywords = "Childhood onset dystonia, Movement disorders, Outcome measures",
author = "Emanuela Pagliano and Giovanni Baranello and Riccardo Masson and Maria Foscan and Arnoldi, {Maria Teresa} and Alessia Marchi and Giorgia Aprile and Chiara Pantaleoni",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.01.014",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "346--353",
journal = "European Journal of Paediatric Neurology",
issn = "1090-3798",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcome measures for children with movement disorders

AU - Pagliano, Emanuela

AU - Baranello, Giovanni

AU - Masson, Riccardo

AU - Foscan, Maria

AU - Arnoldi, Maria Teresa

AU - Marchi, Alessia

AU - Aprile, Giorgia

AU - Pantaleoni, Chiara

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - The huge contribution of advances in the pediatric neurosciences, improvements in clinical practice, and new therapeutic options, has led to the development of new models of treatment and rehabilitation for dystonia in the last decade. It is now generally agreed that a multidimensional therapeutic approach is needed for children with motor disorders, whose motor function-conceived as a complex perceptive, motor and cognitive process - is impaired at a crucial time in their development, with a fall out on how their various adaptive functions evolve. Neurophysiological studies, modern neuroimaging techniques, and advances in cognitive psychology have all contributed to improving our understanding of the potential effects of treatments in early age - not only on the symptoms, but also on plasticity processes and neuronal reorganization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) promoted by the WHO, and the diffusion of family-centered models of healthcare have underscored the importance of the ecological perspective with a view to providing effective therapies and a satisfactory quality of life for dystonic children and their families. The advances made in this area have made it necessary to study and develope more appropriate treatment outcome measures. In the light of these aspects, there is still not enough literature on the generally-accepted, exhaustive dystonia assessment tools. Given these limits, it might be useful to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the main tools currently used in this setting.

AB - The huge contribution of advances in the pediatric neurosciences, improvements in clinical practice, and new therapeutic options, has led to the development of new models of treatment and rehabilitation for dystonia in the last decade. It is now generally agreed that a multidimensional therapeutic approach is needed for children with motor disorders, whose motor function-conceived as a complex perceptive, motor and cognitive process - is impaired at a crucial time in their development, with a fall out on how their various adaptive functions evolve. Neurophysiological studies, modern neuroimaging techniques, and advances in cognitive psychology have all contributed to improving our understanding of the potential effects of treatments in early age - not only on the symptoms, but also on plasticity processes and neuronal reorganization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) promoted by the WHO, and the diffusion of family-centered models of healthcare have underscored the importance of the ecological perspective with a view to providing effective therapies and a satisfactory quality of life for dystonic children and their families. The advances made in this area have made it necessary to study and develope more appropriate treatment outcome measures. In the light of these aspects, there is still not enough literature on the generally-accepted, exhaustive dystonia assessment tools. Given these limits, it might be useful to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the main tools currently used in this setting.

KW - Childhood onset dystonia

KW - Movement disorders

KW - Outcome measures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042234033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042234033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.01.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.01.014

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29475818

AN - SCOPUS:85042234033

VL - 22

SP - 346

EP - 353

JO - European Journal of Paediatric Neurology

JF - European Journal of Paediatric Neurology

SN - 1090-3798

IS - 3

ER -