Outcomes in syncope research: a systematic review and critical appraisal

Monica Solbiati, Viviana Bozzano, Franca Barbic, Giovanni Casazza, Franca Dipaola, James V. Quinn, Matthew J. Reed, Robert S. Sheldon, Win Kuang Shen, Benjamin C. Sun, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Raffaello Furlan, Giorgio Costantino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Syncope is the common clinical manifestation of different diseases, and this makes it difficult to define what outcomes should be considered in prognostic studies. The aim of this study is to critically analyze the outcomes considered in syncope studies through systematic review and expert consensus. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify prospective studies enrolling consecutive patients presenting to the Emergency Department with syncope, with data on the characteristics and incidence of short-term outcomes. Then, the strengths and weaknesses of each outcome were discussed by international syncope experts to provide practical advice to improve future selection and assessment. 31 studies met our inclusion criteria. There is a high heterogeneity in both outcome choice and incidence between the included studies. The most commonly considered 7-day outcomes are mortality, dysrhythmias, myocardial infarction, stroke, and rehospitalisation. The most commonly considered 30-day outcomes are mortality, haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, dysrhythmias, myocardial infarction, pacemaker or implantable defibrillator implantation, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and syncope relapse. We present a critical analysis of the pros and cons of the commonly considered outcomes, and provide possible solutions to improve their choice in ED syncope studies. We also support global initiatives to promote the standardization of patient management and data collection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)593-601
Number of pages9
JournalInternal and Emergency Medicine
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Syncope
Research
Stroke
Myocardial Infarction
Mortality
Implantable Defibrillators
Incidence
Pulmonary Embolism
Blood Transfusion
Hospital Emergency Service
Prospective Studies
Hemorrhage
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Consensus
  • Emergency Department
  • Outcomes
  • Risk stratification
  • Syncope
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Outcomes in syncope research : a systematic review and critical appraisal. / Solbiati, Monica; Bozzano, Viviana; Barbic, Franca; Casazza, Giovanni; Dipaola, Franca; Quinn, James V.; Reed, Matthew J.; Sheldon, Robert S.; Shen, Win Kuang; Sun, Benjamin C.; Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh; Furlan, Raffaello; Costantino, Giorgio.

In: Internal and Emergency Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2018, p. 593-601.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Solbiati, M, Bozzano, V, Barbic, F, Casazza, G, Dipaola, F, Quinn, JV, Reed, MJ, Sheldon, RS, Shen, WK, Sun, BC, Thiruganasambandamoorthy, V, Furlan, R & Costantino, G 2018, 'Outcomes in syncope research: a systematic review and critical appraisal', Internal and Emergency Medicine, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 593-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-018-1788-z
Solbiati, Monica ; Bozzano, Viviana ; Barbic, Franca ; Casazza, Giovanni ; Dipaola, Franca ; Quinn, James V. ; Reed, Matthew J. ; Sheldon, Robert S. ; Shen, Win Kuang ; Sun, Benjamin C. ; Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh ; Furlan, Raffaello ; Costantino, Giorgio. / Outcomes in syncope research : a systematic review and critical appraisal. In: Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 593-601.
@article{0fead78ac4fb4beda0bafa25b7301d76,
title = "Outcomes in syncope research: a systematic review and critical appraisal",
abstract = "Syncope is the common clinical manifestation of different diseases, and this makes it difficult to define what outcomes should be considered in prognostic studies. The aim of this study is to critically analyze the outcomes considered in syncope studies through systematic review and expert consensus. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify prospective studies enrolling consecutive patients presenting to the Emergency Department with syncope, with data on the characteristics and incidence of short-term outcomes. Then, the strengths and weaknesses of each outcome were discussed by international syncope experts to provide practical advice to improve future selection and assessment. 31 studies met our inclusion criteria. There is a high heterogeneity in both outcome choice and incidence between the included studies. The most commonly considered 7-day outcomes are mortality, dysrhythmias, myocardial infarction, stroke, and rehospitalisation. The most commonly considered 30-day outcomes are mortality, haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, dysrhythmias, myocardial infarction, pacemaker or implantable defibrillator implantation, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and syncope relapse. We present a critical analysis of the pros and cons of the commonly considered outcomes, and provide possible solutions to improve their choice in ED syncope studies. We also support global initiatives to promote the standardization of patient management and data collection.",
keywords = "Consensus, Emergency Department, Outcomes, Risk stratification, Syncope, Systematic review",
author = "Monica Solbiati and Viviana Bozzano and Franca Barbic and Giovanni Casazza and Franca Dipaola and Quinn, {James V.} and Reed, {Matthew J.} and Sheldon, {Robert S.} and Shen, {Win Kuang} and Sun, {Benjamin C.} and Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy and Raffaello Furlan and Giorgio Costantino",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s11739-018-1788-z",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "593--601",
journal = "Internal and Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1828-0447",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes in syncope research

T2 - a systematic review and critical appraisal

AU - Solbiati, Monica

AU - Bozzano, Viviana

AU - Barbic, Franca

AU - Casazza, Giovanni

AU - Dipaola, Franca

AU - Quinn, James V.

AU - Reed, Matthew J.

AU - Sheldon, Robert S.

AU - Shen, Win Kuang

AU - Sun, Benjamin C.

AU - Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh

AU - Furlan, Raffaello

AU - Costantino, Giorgio

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Syncope is the common clinical manifestation of different diseases, and this makes it difficult to define what outcomes should be considered in prognostic studies. The aim of this study is to critically analyze the outcomes considered in syncope studies through systematic review and expert consensus. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify prospective studies enrolling consecutive patients presenting to the Emergency Department with syncope, with data on the characteristics and incidence of short-term outcomes. Then, the strengths and weaknesses of each outcome were discussed by international syncope experts to provide practical advice to improve future selection and assessment. 31 studies met our inclusion criteria. There is a high heterogeneity in both outcome choice and incidence between the included studies. The most commonly considered 7-day outcomes are mortality, dysrhythmias, myocardial infarction, stroke, and rehospitalisation. The most commonly considered 30-day outcomes are mortality, haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, dysrhythmias, myocardial infarction, pacemaker or implantable defibrillator implantation, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and syncope relapse. We present a critical analysis of the pros and cons of the commonly considered outcomes, and provide possible solutions to improve their choice in ED syncope studies. We also support global initiatives to promote the standardization of patient management and data collection.

AB - Syncope is the common clinical manifestation of different diseases, and this makes it difficult to define what outcomes should be considered in prognostic studies. The aim of this study is to critically analyze the outcomes considered in syncope studies through systematic review and expert consensus. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify prospective studies enrolling consecutive patients presenting to the Emergency Department with syncope, with data on the characteristics and incidence of short-term outcomes. Then, the strengths and weaknesses of each outcome were discussed by international syncope experts to provide practical advice to improve future selection and assessment. 31 studies met our inclusion criteria. There is a high heterogeneity in both outcome choice and incidence between the included studies. The most commonly considered 7-day outcomes are mortality, dysrhythmias, myocardial infarction, stroke, and rehospitalisation. The most commonly considered 30-day outcomes are mortality, haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, dysrhythmias, myocardial infarction, pacemaker or implantable defibrillator implantation, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and syncope relapse. We present a critical analysis of the pros and cons of the commonly considered outcomes, and provide possible solutions to improve their choice in ED syncope studies. We also support global initiatives to promote the standardization of patient management and data collection.

KW - Consensus

KW - Emergency Department

KW - Outcomes

KW - Risk stratification

KW - Syncope

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040774294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040774294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11739-018-1788-z

DO - 10.1007/s11739-018-1788-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040774294

VL - 13

SP - 593

EP - 601

JO - Internal and Emergency Medicine

JF - Internal and Emergency Medicine

SN - 1828-0447

IS - 4

ER -