TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of a novel thin-strut bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with chronic total occlusions: A multicenter registry
AU - Azzalini, L
AU - Demir, OM
AU - Gasparini, GL
AU - Grancini, L
AU - La Manna, A
AU - Ojeda, S
AU - Benincasa, S
AU - Bellini, B
AU - Poletti, E
AU - Maccagni, D
AU - Soldi, M
AU - Iannetta, L
AU - Trabattoni, D
AU - Gravina, G
AU - Hidalgo, F
AU - Giannini, F
AU - Pan, M
AU - Tamburino, C
AU - Bartorelli, AL
AU - Reimers, B
AU - Godino, C
AU - Carlino, M
AU - Colombo, A
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: We aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of a novel thin-strut bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as compared with durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (EES). Methods: We compiled a multicenter registry of patients undergoing CTO recanalization followed by BP-SES or EES implantation. The primary endpoint was the incidence of target-lesion failure (TLF, a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization) at one year. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for case mix. Results: Overall, 413 patients were included (BP-SES n = 242, EES n = 171). PSM resulted in 131 matched pairs, which represented the subject of the main analysis. Antegrade wire escalation was the most successful crossing technique (66% vs. 63%, p = 0.98) in both the BP-SES and EES groups, respectively. Procedural success rates were similar between groups (BP-SES 96% vs. EES 93%, p = 0.24). At one-year follow-up, there were no differences in the primary endpoint of TLF (5.7% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.44), and in cardiac death (0.9% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.32), target-vessel myocardial infarction (0.9% vs 1.9%, p = 0.57), target-lesion revascularization (3.7% vs 3.7%, p = 0.99), or stent thrombosis (0.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.57), in BP-SES vs. EES, respectively. Conclusions: Patients undergoing CTO PCI with BP-SES suffer a low rate of TLF at one-year follow-up, which is similar to that of subjects treated with durable-polymer EES. © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
AB - Background: We aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of a novel thin-strut bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as compared with durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (EES). Methods: We compiled a multicenter registry of patients undergoing CTO recanalization followed by BP-SES or EES implantation. The primary endpoint was the incidence of target-lesion failure (TLF, a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization) at one year. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for case mix. Results: Overall, 413 patients were included (BP-SES n = 242, EES n = 171). PSM resulted in 131 matched pairs, which represented the subject of the main analysis. Antegrade wire escalation was the most successful crossing technique (66% vs. 63%, p = 0.98) in both the BP-SES and EES groups, respectively. Procedural success rates were similar between groups (BP-SES 96% vs. EES 93%, p = 0.24). At one-year follow-up, there were no differences in the primary endpoint of TLF (5.7% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.44), and in cardiac death (0.9% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.32), target-vessel myocardial infarction (0.9% vs 1.9%, p = 0.57), target-lesion revascularization (3.7% vs 3.7%, p = 0.99), or stent thrombosis (0.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.57), in BP-SES vs. EES, respectively. Conclusions: Patients undergoing CTO PCI with BP-SES suffer a low rate of TLF at one-year follow-up, which is similar to that of subjects treated with durable-polymer EES. © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.115
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.115
M3 - Article
VL - 258
SP - 36
EP - 41
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
SN - 0167-5273
IS - 2
ER -