Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation in pediatric patients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pediatric pacing presents peculiar challenges and characteristics due to the peculiarity of children and adolescents, above all the somatic growth, but also the active lifestyle, the susceptibility to infections, and the generally anticipated long survival. In contrast, pacemaker (FM) generator and leads are designed for adult patients. Studies concerning children with PM are usually small, disomogeneous and without control groups. Large studies are rare. Moreover, concerns have been raised about long-term outcome of leads, ventricular and valvular dysfunction, venous patency, cosmetic results and psychological factors. So, it is still debated which systems have to be preferred, between the endocardial and the epicardial with steroid-eluting leads. Pediatric PM and (ICDs) show good results, but complications are still frequent, generally lead related, and often require reinterventions. As a general rule, less leads are implanted in children, less complications will occur in the future, and the simplest pacing system (generally, single-chamber PM) has better outcome. The creation of an atrial loop might allow the "elongation" of the lead with the growth. Endocardial and epicardial pacing with steroid-eluting leads have comparable electrical performances, expecially in absence of other congenital heart defects and previous heart surgery, although endocardial pacing shows the best outcomes: it should be the first choice in children over 10-15 kg.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)803-813
Number of pages11
JournalMinerva Cardioangiologica
Volume55
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Pediatrics
Steroids
Ventricular Dysfunction
Congenital Heart Defects
Growth
Cosmetics
Thoracic Surgery
Life Style
Psychology
Control Groups
Survival
Infection

Keywords

  • Cardiac pacing, artificial, complications
  • Child
  • Defibrillators, implantable
  • Endocardial leads
  • Epicardial leads
  • Heart failure, congestive
  • Infant
  • Infant, newborn
  • Lead malfunction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation in pediatric patients. / Silvetti, M. S.

In: Minerva Cardioangiologica, Vol. 55, No. 6, 12.2007, p. 803-813.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87f5167ad4434f28b8234226cf552109,
title = "Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation in pediatric patients",
abstract = "Pediatric pacing presents peculiar challenges and characteristics due to the peculiarity of children and adolescents, above all the somatic growth, but also the active lifestyle, the susceptibility to infections, and the generally anticipated long survival. In contrast, pacemaker (FM) generator and leads are designed for adult patients. Studies concerning children with PM are usually small, disomogeneous and without control groups. Large studies are rare. Moreover, concerns have been raised about long-term outcome of leads, ventricular and valvular dysfunction, venous patency, cosmetic results and psychological factors. So, it is still debated which systems have to be preferred, between the endocardial and the epicardial with steroid-eluting leads. Pediatric PM and (ICDs) show good results, but complications are still frequent, generally lead related, and often require reinterventions. As a general rule, less leads are implanted in children, less complications will occur in the future, and the simplest pacing system (generally, single-chamber PM) has better outcome. The creation of an atrial loop might allow the {"}elongation{"} of the lead with the growth. Endocardial and epicardial pacing with steroid-eluting leads have comparable electrical performances, expecially in absence of other congenital heart defects and previous heart surgery, although endocardial pacing shows the best outcomes: it should be the first choice in children over 10-15 kg.",
keywords = "Cardiac pacing, artificial, complications, Child, Defibrillators, implantable, Endocardial leads, Epicardial leads, Heart failure, congestive, Infant, Infant, newborn, Lead malfunction",
author = "Silvetti, {M. S.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "803--813",
journal = "Minerva Cardioangiologica",
issn = "0026-4725",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation in pediatric patients

AU - Silvetti, M. S.

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - Pediatric pacing presents peculiar challenges and characteristics due to the peculiarity of children and adolescents, above all the somatic growth, but also the active lifestyle, the susceptibility to infections, and the generally anticipated long survival. In contrast, pacemaker (FM) generator and leads are designed for adult patients. Studies concerning children with PM are usually small, disomogeneous and without control groups. Large studies are rare. Moreover, concerns have been raised about long-term outcome of leads, ventricular and valvular dysfunction, venous patency, cosmetic results and psychological factors. So, it is still debated which systems have to be preferred, between the endocardial and the epicardial with steroid-eluting leads. Pediatric PM and (ICDs) show good results, but complications are still frequent, generally lead related, and often require reinterventions. As a general rule, less leads are implanted in children, less complications will occur in the future, and the simplest pacing system (generally, single-chamber PM) has better outcome. The creation of an atrial loop might allow the "elongation" of the lead with the growth. Endocardial and epicardial pacing with steroid-eluting leads have comparable electrical performances, expecially in absence of other congenital heart defects and previous heart surgery, although endocardial pacing shows the best outcomes: it should be the first choice in children over 10-15 kg.

AB - Pediatric pacing presents peculiar challenges and characteristics due to the peculiarity of children and adolescents, above all the somatic growth, but also the active lifestyle, the susceptibility to infections, and the generally anticipated long survival. In contrast, pacemaker (FM) generator and leads are designed for adult patients. Studies concerning children with PM are usually small, disomogeneous and without control groups. Large studies are rare. Moreover, concerns have been raised about long-term outcome of leads, ventricular and valvular dysfunction, venous patency, cosmetic results and psychological factors. So, it is still debated which systems have to be preferred, between the endocardial and the epicardial with steroid-eluting leads. Pediatric PM and (ICDs) show good results, but complications are still frequent, generally lead related, and often require reinterventions. As a general rule, less leads are implanted in children, less complications will occur in the future, and the simplest pacing system (generally, single-chamber PM) has better outcome. The creation of an atrial loop might allow the "elongation" of the lead with the growth. Endocardial and epicardial pacing with steroid-eluting leads have comparable electrical performances, expecially in absence of other congenital heart defects and previous heart surgery, although endocardial pacing shows the best outcomes: it should be the first choice in children over 10-15 kg.

KW - Cardiac pacing, artificial, complications

KW - Child

KW - Defibrillators, implantable

KW - Endocardial leads

KW - Epicardial leads

KW - Heart failure, congestive

KW - Infant

KW - Infant, newborn

KW - Lead malfunction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38649140459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38649140459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 803

EP - 813

JO - Minerva Cardioangiologica

JF - Minerva Cardioangiologica

SN - 0026-4725

IS - 6

ER -