Pamidronate versus observation in asymptomatic myeloma: Final results with long-term follow-up of a randomized study

Giovanni D'Arena, Paolo G. Gobbi, Chiara Broglia, Stefano Sacchi, Giovanni Quarta, Luca Baldini, Emilio Iannitto, Antonietta Falcone, Roberto Guariglia, Giuseppe Pietrantuono, Oreste Villani, Maria Carmen Martorelli, Giovanna Mansueto, Grazia Sanpaolo, Nicola Cascavilla, Pellegrino Musto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing pamidronate administration (60-90 mg once a month for 1 year) versus simple observation in 177 patients with asymptomatic myeloma was performed to explore whether the administration of this drug reduces the rate of and/or the time to progression to overt, symptomatic disease. No relevant side effects were recorded in pamidronate-treated patients. With a minimum follow-up of 5 years for live patients, there were 56/89 (62.9%) progressions in the pamidronate-treated group and 55/88 (62.5%) within the controls (p = NS). Median time to progression was 46 and 48 months, respectively (p = NS). Overall survival was also similar between the two groups. Skeletal-related events at the time of progression were observed in 40/55 (72.7%) controls, but only in 22/56 (39.2%) pamidronate-treated patients (p = 0.009). In conclusion, the administration of pamidronate in asymptomatic myeloma, while reducing bone involvement at progression, did not decrease the risk of transformation and the time to progression into overt myeloma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)771-775
Number of pages5
JournalLeukemia and Lymphoma
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Keywords

  • asymptomatic myeloma
  • bisphosphonates
  • bone lesions
  • multiple myeloma
  • Pamidronate
  • zoledronate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pamidronate versus observation in asymptomatic myeloma: Final results with long-term follow-up of a randomized study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this