Pathological and molecular heterogeneity of medulloblastoma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Purpose of review The outcome of medulloblastoma patients and the quality of life of survivors can be improved by both novel therapies and a better tumor classification. This review will focus on the pathology and molecular biology of medulloblastoma and its potential to influence risk assignment and future therapy. Recent findings A risk stratification system of pediatric medulloblastoma based on a combination of histopathological evaluation and targeted molecular analysis can be outlined. Among the four variants recognized by the 2007 WHO classification, the desmoplastic medulloblastoma and the medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity have significantly better survival with respect to classic medulloblastoma, whereas the large-cell and anaplastic have a worse prognosis. Moreover, 17p loss, MYC amplification/expression, and 1 q gain are associated with poor prognosis; in contrast, monosomy 6, mutation of CTNNB1, and trkC expression identify tumors with a favorable outcome. Emerging evidence indicates that the different precursor cell populations that form the cerebellum are susceptible to mutations in signal pathways that regulate their functions; these mutations alter normal development programmes and may result in the formation of distinct variants of medulloblastoma. Summary Better understanding of the growth control mechanisms involved in the development and progression of medulloblastoma will allow improved therapeutic stratification of patients using existing adjuvant therapy as well as the development of new therapeutic approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)668-675
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent Opinion in Oncology
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008


  • Cerebellum
  • Medulloblastoma
  • Notch
  • Sonic hedgehog
  • Wnt

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology


Dive into the research topics of 'Pathological and molecular heterogeneity of medulloblastoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this